Bent Flyvbjerg
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
What Causes Cost Overrun in Transport Infrastructure Projects?
2004, Transport Reviews, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3-18
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164032000080494
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
Results from the first statistically significant study of the causes of cost escalation in transport infrastructure projects are presented. The study is based on a sample of 258 rail, bridge, tunnel and road projects worth US$90 billion. The focus is on the dependence of cost escalation on: (1) the length of the project‐implementation phase, (2) the size of the project and (3) the type of project ownership. First, it was found, with very high statistical significance, that cost escalation was strongly dependent on the length of the implementation phase. The policy implications are clear: decision‐makers and planners should be highly concerned about delays and long implementation phases because they translate into risks of substantial cost escalations. Second, projects have grown larger over time, and for bridges and tunnels larger projects have larger percentage cost escalations. Finally, by comparing the cost escalation for three types of project ownership - private, state‐owned enterprise and other public ownership - it was shown that the oft‐seen claim that public ownership is problematic and private ownership effective in curbing cost escalation is an oversimplification. The type of accountability appears to matter more to cost escalation than type of ownership.
References (26)
- Ardity, David, Akan, Guzin Tarim and Gurdamar, San 'Cost Overruns in Public Projects', International Journal of Project Management vol. 3, no. 4, 1985, pp. 218-225.
- Ascher, Kate, The Politics of Privatization: Contracting Out Public Services (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1987).
- Bailey, Elizabeth E. and Rothenberg Pack, Janet, eds., The Political Economy of Privatization and Deregulation (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1995).
- Bozeman, Barry, 'Exploring the Limits of Public and Private Sectors: Sector Boundaries as Maginot Line', Public Administration Review, vol. 48, no. 2, 1988, pp. 672- 673.
- Bruzelius, Nils, Flyvbjerg, Bent and Rothengatter, Werner, 'Big Decisions, Big Risks: Improving Accountability in Mega Projects', International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 64, no. 3, September 1998, pp. 423-440.
- Chan, Daniel W. M. and Kumaraswamy, Mohan M., 'A Comparative Study of Causes of Time Overruns in Hong Kong Construction Projects', International Journal of Project Management, vol. 15, no. 1, 1997, pp. 55-63.
- Clark, Cal, Heilman, John G. and Johnson, Gerald W., 'Privatization: Moving Beyond Laissez Faire', Policy Studies Review, vol. 14, no. 3-4, Autumn-Winter 1995- 1996, pp. 395-406.
- Commission of the European Union. Growth, Competitiveness, Employment: The Challenges and Ways Forward Into the 21st Century. White Paper (Brussels: Commission of the European Union, 1993).
- Ellis, W., 'Welcome to a New White Elephant', Financial Times, 17 August 1985.
- Finansministeriet, Erfaringer med statslige aktieselskaber (Experience With State- Owned Enterprises) (Copenhagen: Ministry of Finance, 1993).
- Flyvbjerg, Bent, Holm, Mette K. Skamris and Buhl, Søren L., 'Cost Underestimation in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie?' Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 68, no. 3, Summer 2002, pp. XXX-XXX.
- Flyvbjerg, Bent, Holm, Mette K. Skamris and Buhl, Søren L., 'How Common and How Large Are Cost Escalations in Transport Infrastructure Projects?' Forthcoming.
- Flyvbjerg, Bent, Bruzelius, Nils and Rothengatter, Werner, Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
- Gilmour, Robert S. and Jensen, Laura S., 'Reinventing Government Accountability: Public Functions, Privatization, and the Meaning of "State Action"', Public Administration Review, vol. 58, no. 3, May/June 1998, pp. 247-258.
- Gómez-Ibáñez, José A. and Meyer, John R., Going Private: The International Experience with Transport Privatization (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1993).
- Handler, Joel F., Down from Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Privatization and Empowerment (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996).
- Hanke, Steve H., ed., Prospects for Privatization (New York: The Academy of Polical Science, 1987).
- Kamerman, Sheila B. and Kahn, Alfred J., ds., Privatization and the Welfare State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989).
- Merewitz, Leonard, 'Cost Overruns in Public Works', in Niskanen, William A., Harberger, Arnold C., Haveman, Robert H., Turvey, Ralph and Zeckhauser, Richard, eds., Benefit-Cost and Policy Analysis (Chicago: Aldine Publishers, 1973), pp. 277-295; reprint no. 114 (Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, 1973).
- Morris, Peter W. G. and Hough, George H., The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987).
- Moe, Ronald C., 'Exploring the Limits of Privatization', Public Administration Review, vol. 47, no. 6, 1987, pp. 453-460.
- Moran, Michael and Prosser, Tony, eds., Privatization and Regulatory Change in Europe (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1994).
- Preston, John, 'The Economics of British Rail Privatization: an Assessment', Transport Reviews, vol. 16, no. 1, 1996, pp. 1-21.
- Seidenstat, Paul, 'Privatization: Trends, Interplay of Forces, and Lessons Learned', Policy Studies Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, 1996, pp. 464-477.
- Snow, Peter and Dinesen, Betzy, eds., Beyond 2000: a Source Book for Major Projects (England: Major Projects Association, 1994).
- Wright, Vincent, ed., Privatization in Western Europe: Pressures, Problems and Paradoxes (London: Pinter Publishers, 1994).