Key research themes
1. How does cognitive ethology integrate interdisciplinary perspectives to advance understanding of animal and human cognition?
This theme investigates cognitive ethology as a multidisciplinary endeavor that bridges biology, philosophy, psychology, and social sciences to provide a richer understanding of cognition across species. It emphasizes the historical development, theoretical frameworks, and institutional efforts that shape the field’s approach to studying minds and behaviors—human and non-human alike. Understanding these integrative influences is vital because they impact methodological choices, conceptual clarity, and the applicability of findings across domains including animal welfare, social theory, and environmental ethics.
2. What are the theoretical challenges and opportunities in conceptualizing cognition and consciousness beyond anthropocentric and representational frameworks?
This theme addresses foundational questions in cognitive ethology and cognitive science regarding the nature of cognition and consciousness, focusing especially on non-human animals and alternative theoretical frameworks such as enactivism, ecological psychology, and phenomenology. These debates critically analyze classical cognitivist, representationalist, or computational accounts of mind, questioning assumptions like internal representation and anthropocentrism. The aim is to develop models that better capture the lived, embedded, and dynamic processes of cognition as it manifests across biological and social contexts.
3. How can models of animal consciousness and episodic memory be framed to reflect naturalistic, teleonomic, and semiotic processes rather than anthropocentric assumptions?
This theme explores contemporary approaches that model non-human animal cognition—especially consciousness and episodic memory—using evolutionary biology, teleonomic explanations, and semiotic theory. Rejecting anthropocentric baselines and highlighting the evolutionary gradualism of consciousness, these works emphasize the need to understand animal cognitive capacities as adapted responses to ecological and pathological complexities. Additionally, semiotic frameworks provide tools for capturing the representational and interpretive dynamics of episodic memory beyond strict behavioral paradigms, enhancing cognitive ethology’s empirical and theoretical reach.