Out of Southern China?
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
AI
AI
The paper explores linguistic connections between the Japonic and Tai-Kadai language families, addressing the potential Urheimat of Japonic languages, and challenging prior notions of genetic relationships in favor of contact-based theories. It discusses various phonological and morphological parallels, and suggests that observed similarities may not indicate a genuine genetic link but rather interactions shaped by historical language contact.
Related papers
2019
This study explores palatalization and vowel coalescence in Jejueo, a language spoken in Jeju Island. This study establishes a corpus based on Hyon (1962) and focuses on dental and velar palatalization. The data reveal different patterns of variants in the two types of palatalization. In Jejueo, there are three phonetic realizations of vowels in kpalatalization and two realizations in h-palatalization. According to the data, this study also suggests a chronology: palatalization preceding vowel coalescence.
International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics 2 , 2020
This paper provides a comparative analysis of Old Japanese negative forms of bigrade verbs and their cognates in Sakishima/South Ryukyuan languages. South Ryukyuan cognates of bigrade verbs in their negative forms, as well as a number of other forms traditionally associated with the irrealis (mizenkei, 未然形) base, essentially present two suffixes: one, a straightforward cognate with the analogous suffixes elsewhere in Japonic, being traceable to Proto-Sakishima *-en-, the other being traceable to Proto-Sakishima *-on-, with no clear Japonic cognates. My argument is that despite the appearances, this *-en-/*-on-alternation is not a result of a Sakishima innovation, but instead is rooted in Proto-Japonic morphology of vowel verbs. By applying the rules of vowel crasis and contraction known for Proto-Japonic and Old Japanese, I postulate the proto-language coexistence of two forms of verbal negation: one derived from the Proto-Japonic ancestor of nominalized (one of the functions of the ren'yōkei 連用形) and the other from the finite (shūshikei 終止形) base forms. I conclude that the former was broadly distributed throughout the Proto-Japonic area, while the latter was confined to the regions that eventually bore Proto-Sakishima speakers.
This paper reconstructs the Proto-Naish rhyme system to advance the probing of the genetic position of the Naish languages. Data from 3 Naish languages-Lijiangba, Malimasa, and Yongning-are employed in the reconstruction. Rhyme correspondences revealed by comparing the three languages are interpreted by conservative languages, such as Tibetan, Burmese and rGyalrong. Other Naic languages, such as Namuyi and Xumi, are taken as references. Five vowels, *-a, *-e, *i, *-u, *-o, and six consonant codas, *-k, *-ɣ, *-t, *-l, *-p, *-m, are reconstructed to Proto-Naish. Some general tendencies of the sound changes of the Naish languages are summarized. Keywords: Rhyme; Naish languages; Tibeto-Burman languages; historical phonology LJ MM YN Context J&M (Naxi: Na: Laze) e ɛ i (others) e: i:, i.e., < *a uɑ uɑ uɤ Kw wɑ: wɤ: wɤ < *a Jacques and Michaud ( ) also claim that the correspondence /i: i: i/ is derived from *a in the context *ŋ-. However, I prefer to treat this correspondence as a variant of *-i. The reasons will be provided in the discussion of the contrast between *-e and *-i. Three more rhyme correspondences have been detected as variants of *-a in the context of *Pw-, *R-and *mr-, as shown in Table 2. The only examples with cognates that have been found in conservative languages are listed. Those that do not have counterparts in conservative languages are presented in the Appendix. Examples of each of the following sets of correspondences are provided in the same way. Table 2 Three more correspondence rules reflect the Proto-Naish *-a Corr. Gloss LJ MM YN WT Bur. GR Others Context PN u: ɑ: o to bring pu˥ pɑ˥ po˧˥ phwāḥ NMY pa³⁵ Pw *a to spread [[phv̩ ˥]] phɑ˩ pʰo˧˥ phwa NMY npha³¹ Pw *a u: ɚ: e to look for ʂu˩ la˧ʂɚ˧ ʂe˧ rhā < *ˀrā NMY ʂu31 XM ɕɛ⁵⁵ *R *a louse ʂu˧ ʂɚ˧mɛ˧ ʂe˧mi˧ sanḥ < *ˀśanḥ NMY ʂu55 XM ɕɛ⁵⁵ *R *a ɯ: e: i scar mɯ˧ tsɯ ˥ me˧kho˧ mi˧pɤ˧ rma mra -mu *mr *a bamboo mɯ˥lɯ˧ me˥ʂi˩ "yellow bamboo" mi˩ɬi˩˧ mraṅ "kind of bamboo" NMY ma 35 *mr *a Note that "to look for" and "louse" in Naish languages have the same retroflex fricative initials as "meat", which was used in Jacques and Michaud (2011) as a representative of the correspondence /ɯ: e: ɯ/ (/ɯ: i: e/ in the present study), and they all have retroflex initials in Proto-Burmish, as illustrated in Hill (2019: 56). Therefore, "meat" in Naish languages may be an exception in the context of retroflex fricative initials but are merged with the reflex in the context of *ɡr and *tr (as illustrated by "to fall" and "earth", Jacques and Michaud 2011 Appendix: 11). The correspondences /u: ɑ: o / and /ɯ: e: i / appear after *Pw-and *mr-, respectively. The cognates in NMY suggest that these morphemes remained to have *-a at the stage of Naic. The medials -wand -r-affected the rhymes in Naish languages but were directly lost in NMY. The correspondence /ɑ: ɑ: ɑ/ does not appear in the context of velar initials only. There are also examples of this correspondence in the context of alveolar plosive/nasal/lateral initials. These examples actually represent another set of correspondences, which will be further discussed in 3.1. In all, there are 9 correspondences in the complementary distribution with one another, and they correspond to the same vowel in related languages. Therefore, they can be reconstructed back to one and the same rhyme *a in Proto-Naish, as shown in Table .
Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia
The development of the Proto-Austronesian (PAN) vowels in Rejang is of interest for two reasons. First, it exemplifies a pattern of phonemic splits, shifts and mergers of unusual complexity for an Austronesian (AN) language. Second, it shows that this pattern and exceptions to it cannot be stated in full without reference to semantic conditions. In connection with the first point Dyen (1949) described the development of the PAN vowels in Trukese. His central concern was to state the conditions under which a reconstructed four vowel system could be mapped systematically onto an attested nine vowel system. Superficially the history of the Rejang vowels appears simpler, as Rejang has only six vowel contrasts. However, the PAN vowels have in fact undergone more splits in Rejang than in Trukese. This greater diachronic complexity is partially reflected in a wealth of diphthongs possibly unequalled in any other AN language. In connection with the second point the often-heard assertion that meaning-based exceptions to sound change do not exist appears to conflict with the exceptional character of the Rejang pronouns and perhaps the kinship terms in relation to otherwise wellestablished phonological changes.
Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics, 2016
It is proposed that oc pharyngealized onset consonants—that is, ‘type-A’ onset consonants—arose out of Proto-Sino-Tibetan plain consonants followed by geminate vowels separated by a pharyngeal fricative. When the first copy of the geminate vowel fell, the initial consonants formed clusters with the pharyngeal fricative, evolving into the oc pharyngealized consonants we reconstruct. In the Kuki-Chin branch of Tibeto-Burman, the pharyngeal fricative fell, and long vowels resulted. This proposal supposes a statistical correlation between Kuki-Chin long vowels and oc type-A words on the one hand, and between Kuki-Chin short vowels and oc type-B words on the other, as originally proposed by S. Starostin. A significant statistic bearing on forty-three probable Chinese-Kuki-Chin cognates supports this correlation. Thus reconstructed, a precursor language of Proto-Sino-Tibetan was aligned with Proto-Austronesian and Proto-Austroasiatic in exhibiting a surface constraint against monomoraic f...
1992
Languages referred to, with abbreviations and primary lexical sources MAP CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2: PHONOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE MALA YIC ISOLECTS 2.1 The Standard Malay phoneme system 2.2 The Minangkabau phoneme system 2.3 The Banj ar Hulu phoneme system 2.4 The Seraway phoneme system 2.5 The Iban phoneme system 2.6 The Jakartanese phoneme system CHAPTER 3: THE RECONSTRUCTION OF PROTO MALA YIC PHONEMES 3.1 The PM plain vowels 3.2 The PM diphthongs 3.3 The PM sernivowels 3.4 The PM voiceless stops 3.5 The PM voiced stops 3.6 The PM nasals 3.7 The PM liquids 3.8 The PM sibilant 3.9 The PM glottal spirant 3.10 PM (intervocalic) *(lJ 3.11 Changes in mN antepenultimate syllables and in adj acent consonants 3.12 Summary of Chapter 3 CHAPTER 4: PROTO MALA YIC WORD STRUCTURE 4. 1 The PM phoneme system 4.2 The PM canonical shape and phonotactic constraints 4.3 Articulation-type harmony 4.4 A constraint on final labials preceded by *i 4.5 Vowel contraction in PM lexemes of more than two syllables 4.6 Syncope of the penultimate vowel of trisyllables ill v V1l viii viii ix xi
2018
Rice (rice plant)" in Hmong-Mien Some of the data sources do not have the item "rice as a plant" distinguished from the item "rice as a grain". In this case, we look up the forms for "early-ripening rice" and "late-ripening rice", and identify the part for "rice" in the word-form. In such a case, the part that we use might not be a word, but a bound morpheme. Most of the forms for "rice plant" in Hmong-Mien come from a single etymon, reconstructed as *mblәu in Ratliff ( ). The initial consonant of the form is a prenasalized plosive, where the nasal part and the plosive part are always homorganic. The tone of the modern reflexes is Tone 2 (Tone A in some lects). We designate all the forms cognate with this proto-form as Type A. Type A lects are divided into several subgroups, depending on the development of the prenasalized initial. First, Subgroup A-1, represented by mple, retains both the nasal part and the bilabial plosive part. Subgroup A-2, represented by blau, has lost the nasal part with the plosive part voiced. Subgroup A-3, represented by plau, has also lost the nasal part but does not have the plosive voiced. Subgroup A-4, represented by mjo, does not have the plosive part and the following lateral changes into j. In subgroup A-5, represented by ndli, the plosive part has the place of articulation assimilated to that of the following lateral. Subgroup A-6, represented by nɯ, only retains the nasal part. These various forms observed in Type A are the result of regular sound changes.
International Journal of American Linguistics, 2021
This paper offers a comparative reconstruction of the phonology of Proto-Purus (PP), the common ancestor of Iñapari, Apurinã and Yine. The reconstruction presented here differs in many ways from current opinion on PP phonology: I argue that the contrast between r and l is a secondary development in Yine, that there is no need for reconstructing a vowel *I, and that most if not all instances of initial h in Yine reflect PP *h. Also, based on correspondences between syncopated vowels in Yine and mobile accents in Iñapari, I reconstruct for PP a morphological or mobile accentual system. Next, shared innovations support the classification of the sparsely documented Kuniba and Kanamirim together with Yine, but do not point to any compelling subgrouping hypothesis involving Yine, Apurinã and Iñapari. The paper ends with an appendix listing all 206 cognate sets used in the reconstruction, along with etymological notes.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.