Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Key Takeaways
Summary and Concluding Remarks
References
All Topics
Languages and Linguistics
East Asian Languages and Societies

New contributions to Waic phonological studies: Va

Profile image of Jackson Tianshin SunJackson Tianshin Sun

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This paper delves into the phonological system of the Yingla variety of Va, examining its evolution from the ancestral Proto-Wa-Lawa system as reconstructed by Diffloth. It presents a detailed analysis of significant sound changes that have occurred over time, highlighting contributions to Waic phonological studies and suggesting areas for future research.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. Va has transitioned from a sesquisyllabic to a fully monosyllabic word structure.
  2. The analysis reveals a distinct phonological system in the Yingla variety of Va.
  3. Va demonstrates a complex syllable structure including CC and CCC onsets.
  4. The evolution of three tones in Va correlates with PWL onset consonants.
  5. Future research should focus on documenting under-researched tone systems in related Wa-Lawa languages.

Related papers

New contributions to Palaungic phonological studies: Lavïa
Jackson Tianshin Sun
View PDFchevron_right
The Full ~ Reduced Vowel Contrast in Tetso ̨́ t’ıné Evidence for an 8 vowel system
Alessandro Jaker

2019

Many Dene (Athabaskan) languages, including the reconstructed Proto-Dene language (Krauss 1964), are known to exhibit a contrast between a set of FULL vowels, which are long, tense, and peripheral, and a set of REDUCED vowels, which are short, lax, and centralized. In this paper, I argue that a contrast between full and reduced vowels also exists in Tetso ̨́ t’ıné Yatıé, a dialect of Dëne Sųłıné (CHP) spoken in the Northwest Territories, Canada. I report the results of a pilot experiment involving 3 Tetso ̨́ t’ıné speakers, which show that this dialect has a total of 8 vowels in morphologically non-derived stems: five full vowels a [aː], e [ɛː], i [iː], o [oː], u [ʉː], and three reduced vowels, ä [ɐ], ë [ɘ], and ü [ɵ]. Reduced vowels are both shorter in duration and more centralized than their full counterparts. I also provide distributional evidence that full vowels count as phonologically long, while reduced vowels count as phonologically short, and that the distribution of the re...

View PDFchevron_right
From velar codas to high nuclei: Phonetic and structural change in OT
Jean-Pierre Montreuil

Probus, 2004

This paper uses the formalism of Optimality Theory (OT) to retrace the evolution of the phonological fragment responsible for the structure of rimes, as Gallo-Romance evolved into Middle French. It is shown that the well-formedness of rimes responded to constant pressure to obey emergent markedness criteria and evolved through repeated violations of faithfulness. Two specific issues are closely scrutinized: (1) the interaction that took place, in 4th-c. Gallo-Romance, between various types of yod and two general processes of the phonology of the time: diphthongization and voicing, and (2) the left to right alignment shift within Old French diphthongs and triphthongs which gave to the reflex of former velar consonants full vocalic value and the structural properties of a nucleus head. Reranking of universal constraints, as it reflects perceptual enhancements, provides, together with appropriate stages of relexification, the main tool for an analysis of sound change. * * * Tableau 2. Diphthong stage: Stressed open vowels as rising diphthong /E/ ALIGN, HD, L *LAX & *FALLSON HNUC *LAX *FALLSON i e * ! i e *! ☞ e i * e i *! * * Tableau 3. Diphthong stage: Stressed close vowels as falling diphthongs *FALLSON: no falling sonority in diphthongs *LAX: no lax vowels There is good motivation for the constraints *LAX and *FALLSON. *LAX encodes the relative markedness of lax vowels in Gallo-Romance and indeed in Modern French, especially in open syllables. *FALLSON reflects the fact that falling diphthongs, which emerged late, soon remonophthongized and no longer exist in Modern French 4 , are more marked than rising diphthongs in Gallo-Romance. While these two constraints must be low-ranked, their conjunction plays a major role in the elimination of plausible candidates, since *LAX&*FALLSON penalizes ill-formed diphthongs like *[Ej], where the (rising vs. falling) nature of the diphthong is at odds with the (open vs. close) quality of the vowel. 2.2. Voicing Gallo-Romance shares with Ibero-Romance a tendency to voice consonants intervocalically, or more precisely between voiced continuants. It is generally *VCEOBS: no voiced obstruents IDENT-VCE: I-O faithfulness to voice *VCE-CONTOUR: no voice contour in sequences of V.C(L)V This ranking and the precise formulation of *VCE-CONTOUR prevents the voicing of any obstruent which is geminated or supported, as shown in Tableau 4, where input VkV undergoes lenition but VkkV and VskV stay unchanged. /VkV/ *VCE-CONTOUR IDENT-VCE *VCE-OBS V.kV *! ☞ V.gV * * /VkkV/ *VCE-CONTOUR IDENT-VCE *VCE-OBS ☞ Vk.kV Vg.gV *!* ** /VskV/ *VCE-CONTOUR IDENT-VCE *VCE-OBS ☞ Vs.kV Vs.gV *! * Tableau 4. Fourth-century voicing of intervocalic onsets

View PDFchevron_right
Burgin – Yakubovich. 2024. Initial A Final Low Vowels and Language Contact (Kadmos 63)
James M Burgin

Kadmos 63, 2024

The Anatolian hieroglyphic inventory features two phonetic signs conventionally translated as “a”: 〈a〉 = L. 450 and 〈á〉 = L. 19. Their distribution has eluded explanation due to the complicated conventions governing the use of the 〈a〉 sign, which can be placed at the end of a word (“initial-a-final”), replaced with 〈á〉 (“á-substitution”), or deleted (“a-deletion”). Some words also regularly change between 〈a〉 and 〈á〉 within their paradigm. Based on a more refined understanding of these conventions, which vary by period and location, and comparison with data from the closely related Lycian language and Luwian names in Greek transmission, it will be suggested that 〈a〉 and 〈á〉 corresponded to the low vowels /æ/ and /ɑ/ respectively. It will be argued that distinction between the two vowels in Luwian ultimately arose from the Proto-Anatolian contrast between the short and long non-high vowels, but also in some instances from the Luwic umlaut (mostly anticipatory backing of /æ/ to /ɑ/). New evidence is also put forth that the vowel system of some dialects of Late Luwian underwent a change due to contact with Semitic languages. This resulted in an orthographic reform beginning in the late 9th century BC, which has practical implications for the dating of certain inscriptions.

View PDFchevron_right
Lee Bickmore, Chilungu Phonology , CSLI Publications
Lee Bickmore

Lingua, 2009

Cilungu Phonology provides a comprehensive description of the intricate and diverse tone system of Cilungu, a Bantu language of Zambia classified as M14 in Guthrie's (1967Guthrie's ( -1971 Bantu classification. An asset of this work for which the author must be commended is that it provides a thorough and fully worked out tone system of a particular language in contrast to fragments of tonal systems abounding in the Bantu literature.

View PDFchevron_right
Appendix to A Phonological Reconstruction of Proto-Hlai
Peter Norquest

2016

View PDFchevron_right
On the origin of rime laryngealization in Taoiq: A case study in the phonatory restructuring of vowel quality contrasts
Ryan Gehrmann

International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics 8, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2019

This paper is part of a broader investigation into the phonology of Ta'oiq, an underdocumented, phonologically aberrant language in the Katuic sub-group of Austroasiatic (AA). Most Katuic languages carry a phonological opposition of modal versus breathy voice quality in their vocalic inventories, but Ta'oiq stands out as the only Katuic language with a modal-creaky contrast. Furthermore, while most modal-breathy contrasts in Katuic have their origin in the Southeast Asian register phenomenon, in which consonant onset voicing contrasts are transphonologized into laryngeal features of vowels, the contrasts in the vocalisms of of Ta'oiq and its closest relative, Pacoh, are wholly unrelated to proto-onset voicing. In fact, the vowel phonation contrasts of Ta'oiq and Pacoh are not the result of any phonological split at all. Instead, evidence suggests one of two possible explanations for the emergence of the contrastive vowel phonation pairs in these two Katuic languages: 1) Proto-Katuic (PK) vowel phonemes which were previously redundantly differentiated by both vowel quality and voice quality converged in terms of their vowel quality while preserving and phonologizing the voice quality of each member of the pair or 2) Proto-Katuic itself was a language which had voice quality contrasts and the modern Ta'oiq and Pacoh contrasts are iterations on this old, PK contrast. At this point, both hypotheses remain viable and both have their strengths and weakenesses but in this paper we will argue for the second hypothesis, the PK contrast hypothesis. At this point, this hypothesis fits the Katuic vowel correspondences best but the future viability of the hypothesis will hinge on whether or not the emergence of PK vowel phonation contrasts can be confirmed through external comparison with other AA languages.

View PDFchevron_right
A Naish Historical Phonology Finals 220419.pdf
Zihe Li

This paper reconstructs the Proto-Naish rhyme system to advance the probing of the genetic position of the Naish languages. Data from 3 Naish languages-Lijiangba, Malimasa, and Yongning-are employed in the reconstruction. Rhyme correspondences revealed by comparing the three languages are interpreted by conservative languages, such as Tibetan, Burmese and rGyalrong. Other Naic languages, such as Namuyi and Xumi, are taken as references. Five vowels, *-a, *-e, *i, *-u, *-o, and six consonant codas, *-k, *-ɣ, *-t, *-l, *-p, *-m, are reconstructed to Proto-Naish. Some general tendencies of the sound changes of the Naish languages are summarized. Keywords: Rhyme; Naish languages; Tibeto-Burman languages; historical phonology LJ MM YN Context J&M (Naxi: Na: Laze) e ɛ i (others) e: i:, i.e., < *a uɑ uɑ uɤ Kw wɑ: wɤ: wɤ < *a Jacques and Michaud ( ) also claim that the correspondence /i: i: i/ is derived from *a in the context *ŋ-. However, I prefer to treat this correspondence as a variant of *-i. The reasons will be provided in the discussion of the contrast between *-e and *-i. Three more rhyme correspondences have been detected as variants of *-a in the context of *Pw-, *R-and *mr-, as shown in Table 2. The only examples with cognates that have been found in conservative languages are listed. Those that do not have counterparts in conservative languages are presented in the Appendix. Examples of each of the following sets of correspondences are provided in the same way. Table 2 Three more correspondence rules reflect the Proto-Naish *-a Corr. Gloss LJ MM YN WT Bur. GR Others Context PN u: ɑ: o to bring pu˥ pɑ˥ po˧˥ phwāḥ NMY pa³⁵ Pw *a to spread [[phv̩ ˥]] phɑ˩ pʰo˧˥ phwa NMY npha³¹ Pw *a u: ɚ: e to look for ʂu˩ la˧ʂɚ˧ ʂe˧ rhā < *ˀrā NMY ʂu31 XM ɕɛ⁵⁵ *R *a louse ʂu˧ ʂɚ˧mɛ˧ ʂe˧mi˧ sanḥ < *ˀśanḥ NMY ʂu55 XM ɕɛ⁵⁵ *R *a ɯ: e: i scar mɯ˧ tsɯ ˥ me˧kho˧ mi˧pɤ˧ rma mra -mu *mr *a bamboo mɯ˥lɯ˧ me˥ʂi˩ "yellow bamboo" mi˩ɬi˩˧ mraṅ "kind of bamboo" NMY ma 35 *mr *a Note that "to look for" and "louse" in Naish languages have the same retroflex fricative initials as "meat", which was used in Jacques and Michaud (2011) as a representative of the correspondence /ɯ: e: ɯ/ (/ɯ: i: e/ in the present study), and they all have retroflex initials in Proto-Burmish, as illustrated in Hill (2019: 56). Therefore, "meat" in Naish languages may be an exception in the context of retroflex fricative initials but are merged with the reflex in the context of *ɡr and *tr (as illustrated by "to fall" and "earth", Jacques and Michaud 2011 Appendix: 11). The correspondences /u: ɑ: o / and /ɯ: e: i / appear after *Pw-and *mr-, respectively. The cognates in NMY suggest that these morphemes remained to have *-a at the stage of Naic. The medials -wand -r-affected the rhymes in Naish languages but were directly lost in NMY. The correspondence /ɑ: ɑ: ɑ/ does not appear in the context of velar initials only. There are also examples of this correspondence in the context of alveolar plosive/nasal/lateral initials. These examples actually represent another set of correspondences, which will be further discussed in 3.1. In all, there are 9 correspondences in the complementary distribution with one another, and they correspond to the same vowel in related languages. Therefore, they can be reconstructed back to one and the same rhyme *a in Proto-Naish, as shown in Table .

View PDFchevron_right
High Vowels, Glides, and Japanese Phonology
Wayne Lawrence

2004

View PDFchevron_right
Some Diachronic Phonological changes from Proto-Kuki-Chin to Lutuv
Samson Lotven

Indiana Working Papers in South Asian Languages and Cultures

Lutuv (Lautu) is a Kuki-Chin language that VanBik (2009) places in the Maraic branch alongside Zophei, Mara, Senthang, and Zotung. Lutuv is of particular interest to the diachronic development of Maraic languages in that it is geographically central in the Maraic-speaking area, but shows some differences in historical development from its neighbors. This project is based on my dissertation research on Zophei and was first presented to Dr. Kelly Berkson’s Field Methods class on Lutuv in order to offer researchers of Lutuv (like those in the field methods class) a finer grained look at the diachronic development of syllable rhymes in Lutuv, specifically in comparison with the most closely related Kuki-Chin languages Zophei and Mara. The data set this paper is published separately in this volume as Lexical correspondences between Proto-Kuki-Chin, Hakha Lai, and six Maraic varieties(Lotven, 2020). This research is presented here to be of use to other Lutuv researchers, researchers of Ku...

View PDFchevron_right

References (26)

  1. Burling, Robbins. 1967. Proto Lolo-Burmese. Bloomington: Indiana University.
  2. Bradley, David. 1977. Proto-Loloish tones. In Bradley, David (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics, 1-22. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
  3. Davies, H. R. 1909. Yun-nan: the link between India and the Yangtze. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Diffloth, Gérard. 1980. The Wa languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 5. 1-182.
  5. Diffloth, Gérard. Etymological lexicon of Wa, Lawa, and Bulang. (Unpublished manuscript)
  6. Diffloth, Gérard. 1989-1990. On the Bulang (Blang, Phang) languages. Mon-Khmer Studies 18-19. 35-43.
  7. Edmondson, Jerold A. & Solnit, David B. 1997. Comparative Shan. In Edmondson, Jerold A. & Solnit, David B. (eds.), Comparative Kadai: The Tai branch (Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics 124), 337-359. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.
  8. Gedney, W. J. 1985. Confronting the unknown: Tonal splits and the genealogy of Tai- Kadai. In Thurgood, Graham & Matisoff, James A. & Bradley, David (eds.). Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: The state of the art, 116-124. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
  9. Gedney, W. J. 1989. A checklist for determining tones in Tai dialects. In Bickner, R.J. & Hartmann, J & Hudak, T. J. & Peyasantiwong, P. (eds.), Selected papers on comparative Tai studies, 191-206. Michigan: Center for South and Southeast Asian studies, the University of Michigan.
  10. Haudricourt, André-Georges. 1972. Two-way and three-way splitting of tonal systems in some Far Eastern languages (Translation of Bipartition et tripartition des systèmes de Tons Dans Quelques Langues d'Extrême-Orient. Bulletin de La Société de Linguistique de Paris 56(1): 163-180. 1961. by Christopher Court). In Harris, Jimmy G. & Noss, Richard B. (eds.), Tai phonetics and phonology, 58-86. Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language, Mahidol University.
  11. Hsiu, Andrew. 2015. The Angkuic languages: a preliminary survey. (Paper presented at the 6 th International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics, Siem Reap, Cambodia, July 29-31, 2015)
  12. Li, Daoyong & Nie, Xizhen & Qiu, Efeng. 1986. Bulangyu jianzhi [A brief description of the Bulang language]. Beijing: Minzu Publications.
  13. Liu, Yan. 2006. Menggaomianyu shengdiao yanjiu [Tone in Mon-Khmer languages]. Beijing: Central Minzu University Press.
  14. Maddieson, Ian & Peter Ladefoged. 1985. 'Tense' and 'lax' in four minority languages of China. Journal of Phonetics 13. 433-454.
  15. Matisoff, James A. 1970. Glottal dissimilation and the Lahu high-rising tone: A tonogenetic case-study. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 90(1). 13-44.
  16. Matisoff, James A. 1973. Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Hyman, Larry M. (ed.), Consonant types and tone. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
  17. Rischel, Jørgen. 2008. Sound structure in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Stevens, Kenneth N. 2000. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  19. Sun, Jackson T.-S. To appear in 2018. Pang phonology and vocabulary. In Sun, Jingtao & Yao, Yumin (eds.), Frontiers in Sinitic and Sino-Tibetan linguistics: festschrift in honor of Professor Ting Pang-Hsin on his 80th birthday, 630-650. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
  20. Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 2001. Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia-Mon-Khmer and beyond. In Kaji, Shigeki (ed.), Proceedings of the symposium cross-linguistic studies of tonal phenomena, 45-58. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
  21. Vaux, Bert. 1998. The laryngeal specifications of fricatives. Linguistic Inquiry 29(3). 497- 511.
  22. Yan, Qixiang & Zhou, Zhizhi. 1995. Zhongguo Menggaomian yuzu yuyan yu Nanya yuxi [China's Mon-Khmer languages and the Austroasiatic language family]. Beijing: Central Minzu University Press.
  23. Zhou, Zhizhi & Yan, Qixiang. 1984. Wayu jianzhi [A brief description of Wa language]. Beijing: Minzu Press.
  24. Zhou, Zhizhi. 1988. Wayu Xiyunhua shengdiao qiyuan chutan [Preliminary study on the origin of tones in Xiyun Wa]. Minzu Yuwen 3. 94-100.
  25. Zhou, Zhizhi & Yan, Qixiang & Chen, Guoqing. 2004. Wayu fangyan yanjiu [Research on Wa dialects]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
  26. Zhu, Xiaonon, & Long, Congjun. 2009. Chihua: Wayu songyinjie zhongde yuanyin [Slacking: vowels in lax syllables in Wa]. Minzu Yuwen 2. 69-81.

Related papers

Lee Bickmore, ,Chilungu Phonology (2007) CSLI Publications, University of Chicago Press,Stanford
Nancy Kula

2009

Cilungu Phonology provides a comprehensive description of the intricate and diverse tone system of Cilungu, a Bantu language of Zambia classified as M14 in Guthrie's (1967Guthrie's ( -1971 Bantu classification. An asset of this work for which the author must be commended is that it provides a thorough and fully worked out tone system of a particular language in contrast to fragments of tonal systems abounding in the Bantu literature.

View PDFchevron_right
A sketch of Atsugewi phonology
Jeff Good
View PDFchevron_right
Phonology and Phonetics (w/ Nora C. England)
Brandon Baird

The Mayan Languages, 2017

View PDFchevron_right
Phonological Reconstruction of the Kampan branch of Arawak (2010)
Lev Michael
View PDFchevron_right
/u/ and /i/ Have Seen What Time Does: A typology of sound change within vowel harmony systems
Di W Caminsky

An emerging area of linguistic typology is sound change within particular types of phonological systems (Honeybone & Salmons 2014). Vowel harmony systems, for which many good descriptions now exist (Vago 1980; Ohala 1994), provide fertile ground for such investigations. In this paper, I examine sound change in language families with well-understood vowel harmony systems in both the proto-language and the modern languages: Turkic (Johanson & Csató 1998), Tungusic (Li 1996; Ko 2012), Mongolic (Janhunen 2003a, and Uralic (Abondolo 1998), as well as information from Chukotko-Kamchatkan, Nez Perce and Nilo-Saharan languages. By examining the changes in vowels between the proto-languages and modern languages, I have synthesized the changes found in these systems into a typology. This typology appears to be true regardless of VH type, whether a system is front/back, high/low, or ±ATR. These changes can often create an additional rounding harmony where one was not previously present. The broader patterns of sound changes within VH systems can be categorized into three types: vowel space trading, neutralization at the edges of vowel space, and multiple vowel coalescence. Within these patterns, there are two types of phonetic behavior: cases where a vowel change results in a vowel that behaves according to its new phonetic features, and new vowels that continue to behave within the VH system according to their old phonetic features. Vowel space trading involves mid-vowels rising to high positions and high-vowels lowering to mid. This group of sound changes tends to involve parallel shifts without any neutralization; the mid-vowels rise, often conditioned by a following high vowel, and high-vowels lower to mid position. This shift is more common in back vowels than in front vowels, but accounts exist for both. This most greatly impacts change in harmony systems with height and rounding as harmonizing features; when the vowels behave according to their new phonetic values, they trigger the opposite set of harmonizing vowels. Neutralization at the edges of the vowel space involves VH oppositions mergers) to [i], [a], or [u], each respectively the result of a merger of harmonic vowel pairs and is common in the Tungusic and Mongolic languages (Li 1996; Zheng 1996; Ko 2012; Joseph and Whitman 2012; Janhunen 2003:5). Phonological structure often has functional underpinnings, typically rooted in perceptually contrastive features of vowels. Typological work on consonant and vowel inventories often reflects these statements, such as the most common three-vowel system being [i, a, u]. Importantly, in this typology, I found no neutralization to mid or central vowels. Finally, there is a group of common changes that create new oppositions through vowel coalescence. Most often, a new vowel is created from an existing vowel when a high front vowel /i/ occurs later in the stem. These innovations have the additional effect of altering the harmonizing features of the VH system or introducing new features to the counterpart contrasts, as found in Manchu (Li 1996). Now the vowels more strongly contrast by height rather than simply [ATR]. Coalescence also tends to create new oppositions (rounding), re-orient a VH system, or expand the domain of rounding. Through this study, I show that cross-linguistic patterns of vowel harmony change within these systems can be generalized and classified. Ultimately, this work contributes evidence to the literature on the functional dispersion theory of contrast, especially with regard to maximization distinctiveness of contrasts and minimization articulatory efforts (Flemming 2005; Flemming 2008), and is also a case study that conforms to ideas about vowel acquisition (Joanisse and Seidenberg 1998; Walker 2011). While historical linguists have been skeptical of these motivations for sound change when applied more generally, it appears to hold at least in the complex systems of vowel harmony.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Non-Sinitic Languages of China
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved