Key research themes
1. How do perceptions of deprivation and entitativity influence the relationship between religious fundamentalism and radicalization?
This research area investigates psychological mechanisms linking feelings of personal or collective deprivation to the endorsement of fundamentalist worldviews and potential progression to radicalization. It emphasizes the moderating role of entitativity—the perception of a group as a cohesive, unified entity—in intensifying or attenuating these relationships, particularly within Muslim populations in Europe. Understanding these dynamics helps delineate why some individuals adopt exclusionary or violent religious attitudes while others with similar grievances do not, guiding interventions and counter-radicalization policies.
2. What psychological and social factors underlie the relationship between religious fundamentalism and prejudice?
This theme focuses on unpacking the complex associations between religious fundamentalism and forms of social prejudice, particularly ethnic and sexual prejudice. By differentiating the contributions of Christian orthodoxy and right-wing authoritarianism, this research elucidates how fundamentalist religiosity interacts with sociopolitical orientations to predict discriminatory attitudes. The findings have implications for how researchers conceptualize religious motivations and address prejudice within varied religious and cultural contexts.
3. How do religious doctrines and theological frameworks inform the role of fundamentalism in politics and secularism?
This area examines how theological ideas and institutional relationships between religion and state (differentiation) shape the involvement of fundamentalist religious actors in politics, secularism, and public life. It investigates theological commitments—such as those in Twelver Shiʿism—and political secularism, also analyzing how different interpretative strategies of sacred texts influence fundamentalist movements' political strategies. Understanding these theological underpinnings clarifies the ambivalent political stance of religious fundamentalism across contexts.