Social order is a fundamental pillar of stability, cohesion, and development in societies. This order is sustained through a combination of formal and informal rules and norms, with the law serving as its cornerstone. Law functions not...
moreSocial order is a fundamental pillar of stability, cohesion, and development in societies. This order is sustained through a combination of formal and informal rules and norms, with the law serving as its cornerstone. Law functions not only as a mechanism for organizing social relations but also as the primary indicator of a society's degree of order. When citizens disregard or fail to adhere to legal norms, societies encounter various forms of disorder, deviance, and social threats. Drawing on Giddens' theory, law constitutes a system of formal norms enacted and enforced by state institutions, and any violation thereof constitutes law evasion. As a form of social deviance, law evasion encompasses a broad spectrum of behaviors-ranging from minor, everyday infractions to severe and persistent criminal acts. In Iran, while precise statistics on the prevalence of law evasion remain scarce, the marked rise in the prison population over recent decades signals an escalating trend, warranting rigorous scholarly investigation. Beyond fostering insecurity and eroding social trust, law evasion undermines the efficacy of legal institutions and exacerbates risks of economic and political crises. To develop a nuanced and comprehensive understanding of law evasion in Iran, this study employs a qualitative meta-synthesis approach. Through a systematic literature review, 25 research articles published between 2005 and 2021-each directly addressing law evasion in Iran-were identified and selected. Utilizing directed content analysis, shared concepts, components, and themes across these studies were extracted and synthesized into seven conceptual constructs. The findings reveal that law evasion in Iran stems from a complex, multidimensional interplay of factors. At the demographic level, variables such as age, gender, education, marital status, and employment status exhibit significant correlations with law-evading behaviors. Younger individuals, driven by desires for autonomy and limited life experience, demonstrate higher susceptibility to such behaviors compared to other age cohorts. Men exhibit greater propensity for law evasion than women, whereas higher educational attainment and marriage are generally associated with reduced engagement in such conduct. Socially, structural inequalities and perceptions of relative deprivation-particularly among low-income and marginalized groups-fuel distrust, social exclusion, and Article 10 Scientific Quarterly of S trategic S tudies of Culture Vol.5, Series.19, No.3, Autumn 2025 eventual law evasion. Economically, unemployment, poverty, income disparities, and financial strain diminish incentives for legal compliance and may even incentivize violations. Culturally, the erosion of religious adherence, declining social capital, weak internalization of civic norms, institutional distrust, and dissonance between official and lived values collectively amplify tendencies toward law evasion. Within the political and administrative spheres, inequitable law enforcement, systemic corruption, and inadequate institutional oversight erode public perceptions of legal legitimacy, inadvertently legitimizing law-evading behaviors. Environmental and spatial dimensions further exacerbate this phenomenon: residence in deprived neighborhoods, deficient public spaces, inadequate social services, and dilapidated urban infrastructure create conditions ripe for social disorder. Theoretical frameworks such as anomie (Durkheim, Merton), social control (Hirschi), social capital (Putnam), and social bonding provide a robust foundation for interpreting these causal dynamics. This study underscores the imperative of adopting an interdisciplinary, multi-level approach to mitigate law evasion. Law evasion is not merely a product of individual moral failings but a manifestation of structural crises, policy deficiencies, and socio-cultural fractures. Effective countermeasures demand policies that simultaneously advance social justice, fortify social capital, restore institutional trust, and ameliorate economic, cultural, and urban conditions. The conceptual framework derived from this meta-synthesis offers a valuable foundation for future research, policy formulation, and multidimensional interventions aimed at curbing law evasion in Iran.