“變形音化”是漢字演化過程中一種十分獨特的現象,貫穿漢字發展的各個階段。它是一種“聲化”的手段,但又與“改換聲符”、“添加聲符”等手段不同,在聲化的同時還要顧及字形方面的因素。“變形音化”處於字形和字音的交接點,和“獨體表音字”既有區別又有聯繫。自1991年劉釗在其博士論文《古文字構形研究》中正式提出“變形音化”這一概念以來,學者對該現象多有討論,且有意識地運用到古文字考釋與構形理論研究之中。到目前爲止,各種論著中明確提到的“變形音化”例證已有數百例之多。但學者對“變形音化”...
more“變形音化”是漢字演化過程中一種十分獨特的現象,貫穿漢字發展的各個階段。它是一種“聲化”的手段,但又與“改換聲符”、“添加聲符”等手段不同,在聲化的同時還要顧及字形方面的因素。“變形音化”處於字形和字音的交接點,和“獨體表音字”既有區別又有聯繫。自1991年劉釗在其博士論文《古文字構形研究》中正式提出“變形音化”這一概念以來,學者對該現象多有討論,且有意識地運用到古文字考釋與構形理論研究之中。到目前爲止,各種論著中明確提到的“變形音化”例證已有數百例之多。但學者對“變形音化”內涵的理解以及判斷音近與否的標準並不統一,對一些例證的看法也存在分歧。由於“變形音化”處於字形和字音的交匯點,理論上它也可以用於上古音研究。但截至目前爲止,古音研究中對該材料鮮有涉及。我們認爲其中有兩方面原因。一方面,和諧聲、假借、同源詞等材料不同,“變形音化”中“音近”的尺度不容易把握。同樣是“聲化”,“改換聲符”和“添加聲符”的結果是形聲字,可以作爲諧聲材料使用;但“變形音化”由於需要顧及字形,因此其“聲化”的音近的尺度可能要比諧聲更寬一些。另一方面,變形音化的材料較爲分散,目前還缺乏集中搜集這方面材料的便於參考的工具書。基於以上兩方面的原因,我們認爲有必要對“變形音化”的概念作進一步辨析,對相關例證進行匯總和整理。本文就是這項工作的一個嘗試。本文第一章首先回顧了以往有關“變形音化”的研究成果,並對其中的不足之處做了評析。然後圍繞與諧聲相關的讀音問題做了討論,得出一個討論語音問題的框架。第二章是本文的主體部分。我們將這一章分成“讀音密合的變形音化”和“讀音不密合的變形音化”兩部分,每部分又分爲“商代文字”、“西周文字”、“東周文字”及“秦漢及之後的文字”四個時段,把我們認爲可信的字例依次列舉,並在相應字例下進行說明。我們認爲不可靠的例證,會在“附錄(一)”部分的“備注”一欄作簡短的說明。若問題較複雜,需要花一些篇幅來進行辨析,則將其置於本章第三節“對可能有問題的說法的辨析”。第三章是本文的結論部分。在第二章的基礎上,我們對“變形音化”的內涵做了進一步探討,並强調在研究“變形音化”現象時,要特別注意音系的時代性。變形音化只能增强原來字形的表音能力,但不能分化文字。除了對“變形音化”理論方面的探討外,本文還對一些具體字例的解說提出了新的看法,如“匽”、“弘”、“强”、“施”、“加”、“益”、“聝”、“”等。
Phoneticization-through-deformation ( 變形音化 , henceforth PTD) is an outstandingly unique phenomenon found in the evolution of Chinese characters, permeating nearly every stages of the development. It is basically a way of phoneticization, though distinct from other means, e.g. phonetic component substitution, phonetic component supplementation, etc., for the reason that the graphic shape of the character is involved in the process of phoneticization. PTD lies at the intersection of shape and pronunciation, differing from the so-called "non-composite phonogram"(獨體表音字) while bearing association with it. The notion of PTD was first formally proposed by Liu Zhao in his Ph.D. dissertation Study on the Configuration of Ancient Script(《古文字構形研究》), triggering much discussions among researchers, as the notion was consciously applied to the field of ancient script interpretation and the study of configuration theory. Up until now, the number of explicitly cited instances of PTD in various researches has amounted to hundreds, yet researchers differ over their understanding of the phenomenon, as well as the criteria for judging the closeness of pronunciation, and their opinions concerning some instances remain diverse. Because of its placement at the intersection of shape and pronunciation, PTD is in theory susceptible of application in the study of ancient phonetics. Nevertheless, little reference has been made to PTD materials in the study of ancient phonology to this day. In our view, the reason is two-fold: on the one hand, unlike materials of phonological harmony(諧聲), graphic borrowing and cognates, the criterion of phonetic closeness in PTD is hard to manipulate. Be "phoneticization" as they both may, the result of phonetic component substitution and phonetic component supplementation is picto-phonetic characters, which are fully qualified as evidences of phonological harmony, while the phoneticization of PTD may operate within a broader range of "phonetic closeness" than phonological harmony, due to the involvement of graphic shape. On the other hand, materials of PTD are rather scattered. A reference book collecting them is still wanting at the moment. In light of what's noted above, we hold that it is necessary to dig further into the notion of PTD, as well as collecting and sorting out the instances of it, which is what this dissertation attempts to do. Chapter 1 reviews the previous work on PTD, with some comments on the deficiency of them. Afterwards we address the problems concerning phonological harmony, and a framework of discussing phonetic problem is presented. Chapter 2 is the main body of this paper, which is divided into two parts, namely "phonetically close PTD" and "phonetically distant PTD". Each part is further divided into four sub-parts: Shang Script, West Zhou Script, East Zhou Script, and Script of Qin, Han and afterwards. All examples we consider convincing are listed in order, with some illustrations attached to each. Those we deem unreliable will be briefly explained in the Remarks column of Appendix. If the question in point is complex enough to merit some length to demonstrate, it will be placed at the third section of this chapter "Demonstration of some problematic statements". Chapter 3 concludes this paper. Based on Chapter 2, we further explore the connotation of "PTD", and emphasize on the need to take into account the timing of a phonology system as one studies this phenomenon. PTD serves to enhance a character's ability to represent the pronunciation, but is unable to derive a new character. In addition to the discussion on the PTD theory, this paper presents new ideas about the interpretation of some specific tokens, e.g. yan(匽), hong(弘), qiang(强), shi(施), jia(加), yi(益), guo(聝), etc.