Key research themes
1. How can terrorism be conceptually defined to ground meaningful ethical analysis?
This research theme focuses on the persistent challenges in defining terrorism with sufficient clarity and philosophical rigor to support coherent moral inquiry. Definitional ambiguities hinder effective ethical evaluations, legal adjudications, and policy responses, as terrorism often blends descriptive and evaluative elements, involving both fact and value judgments. Addressing these challenges is critical to differentiate terrorism from other violent acts, avoid ideological biases, and allow moral theorists and policymakers to assess the permissibility or impermissibility of particular terrorist acts or strategies.
2. What are the ethical justifications and critiques of terrorism as political violence?
This theme investigates under what conditions, if any, terrorism might be morally justifiable, situating the question within major ethical theories such as deontology, consequentialism, and virtue ethics. It evaluates classic and contemporary arguments regarding self-defense, political liberation, the moral status of noncombatants, and issues of collective responsibility. Exploring these justifications informs normative frameworks for responding to terrorism and understanding its ethical complexity.
3. Can terrorism be effectively modeled and understood through rational or scientific frameworks to inform counterterrorism?
This research direction examines terrorism through rational-choice, epidemiological, criminological, and sociological methodologies to model its evolution, recruitment dynamics, power structures, and social embeddedness. Understanding terrorist behavior as strategic and rational or influenced by social contagion informs policy design, counterterrorism strategies, and highlights the multifaceted interaction between ideology, social context, and organizational aims.