MRM fflfc 1 he notion of Utopia exists in every culture, capturing shared dreams and common goals. Meaning paradoxically both "no place" and "a good place," utopia also challenges humanity to bring this dream into existence. If all the...
moreMRM fflfc 1 he notion of Utopia exists in every culture, capturing shared dreams and common goals. Meaning paradoxically both "no place" and "a good place," utopia also challenges humanity to bring this dream into existence. If all the arts offer a realm of fantasy where Introduct ion onjoiningthe words Expressionist and utopia produces a conundrum, as I neither term easily lends itself to definition. While Utopia is a vital ingredient of nearly all social ideologiesbe they political, religious, ethical, or aestheticit is not so much a fixed ideal as a mediation between the ideal | and the real, a means of propelling thought forward, of helping it transcend what already is. As an embodiment or vision of what might be, utopia defines itself through opposition to its historical context, thereby gaining a strong social resonance. Like human aspiration or artistic creativity, it depends for its survival on being protean, on defiantly eluding the containment of fixed or exhaustive definitions. While Expressionism is also difficult to define, most historians agree that it was less an artistic or literary style than a socially dynamic cultural movement driven by the forwardlooking ideology of modernism. Running its course in Germany between roughly 1905 and 1920, with echoes lingering into the 1920s, Expressionism offers a historical frame through which we may follow the changing manifestations of utopia within a modernist movement. Thus, while Expressionist Utopias: Paradise, Metropolis, Architectural Fantasy attempts to trace these embodiments of an alternative, potential reality, it also seeks to define the broader role of the metaphor of utopia within the ideology of modernism. During the tumultuous period between the turn of the century and the dawn of the Weimar era, Germany endured extreme social disjunction brought on by galloping industrialization, the horrific world war that such industrialization made possible, and the social and economic instability that followed. The architectural fantasies at the center of this exhibition represent a response to these conditions, expressing the faith among artists and architects in the power of aesthetic activity to shape a better world. The Utopian architects of the Glaserne Kette (Crystal chain), a group assembled by Bruno Taut in 1919, attempted to restore the image of a humanity at home in the cosmos through architectural invention. With sources ranging from the religious tradition of the Apocalypse to the secular hymns of a new pantheism, their fantasies also embodied an elemental search for universal rhythms and structural principles in images such as idealized agrarian communities and futuristic worlds dependent on miraculous advances in technology for their creation or discovery. These visionary works, which had reverberations in architecture throughout the Weimar era, cannot be understood without considering prewar Expressionist antecedents, especially the portrayals of a natural paradise by the artists of the Dresden Briicke (Bridge) and the Munich Blaue Reiter (Blue rider). Expressionist architectural fantasies also responded to the urban phase of early Expressionism, centered in Berlin just prior to World War I. The man-made metropolis was ambivalently viewed as both a "second nature" and an antipode to the natural paradise. While the architects' fantasies were often unbuildable, they succeeded in transforming the earlier Expressionists' expectations of Wenzel Hablik Untitled, 1909 Cat. no. 55 sublime. Despite the decline of the landscape genre and the rejection of traditional religious imagery, art became the principal arena for the revelatory enactment of Utopian visions. Through art, as David Frisby shows, Expressionist Utopias could be situated even in the contradictory context of the metropolis, that phenomenon of industrialization that enticed and repelled a generation attuning itself to the conditions of modernity. Drawing parallels between Expressionist depictions of the metropolis and the sociological writings of Ferdinand Tonnies, Max Weber, Georg Simmel, and others, Frisby shows how art could embody a Utopian vision of the future imbedded in the fragmentary present. Similarly, in his interrogation and rejection of the received view of Expressionist architecture as an isolated and irrational interlude in the forward march of modern functionalism, Iain Boyd Whyte shows how the sublime, associated with nature during the Romantic period, became linked with the processes and products of industrialization, including the great cities it made possible. In its confrontation with the unportrayable, the sublime was joined with the concept of Utopia, both in grand architectural schemes and in morally conceived alternative communities. The fate of Utopia, as Anton Kaes suggests in his discussion of Fritz Lang's Metropolis, was balanced precariously between the progressive and dangerously repressive tendencies of modernism. Drawing on ideas developed by the Utopian architects during the 1910s, Metropolis evoked the spectacle of the rationalized secular world of high capitalism in its complex relationship with religion, irrationality, and spirituality, remnants of an earlier era. Kaes examines the film's controversial reconciliation of these two worlds in terms of the contradictory nature of modernity. As much as any modernist movement, Expressionism was held together by an elastic web of social exchange in which issues were discussed in letters, articles, manifestos, and books. The Appendix of this volume presents an overview of this exchange, including a sampling of the Glaserne Kette's Utopian correspondence. To aid the reader in understanding this interaction and the careers of the participants, the Catalogue of the Exhibition includes biographies of the artists and architects whose work is represented. Despite their diversity, the many manifestations of the Expressionist revival of Utopia examined in this exhibition responded to the same dilemma: Could a transcendent artistic experience lead to an actual Utopia, or was it merely an escape from social constraints and economic realities that would first have to be resolved before a Utopia could even be imagined? Ernst Bloch came to the conclusion that art derives its essential validity from its ability both to confront reality critically and to propose an alternative vision. Through this utopian function of affirmation and negation, art can inform humanity about the future in terms entirely of the present, offering a glimpse of destiny rooted in the immediacy of aesthetic experience.