In the British Parliament, L81'.1906", which suggested the interesting avenue of exploring the connection between Irish Hone Rulers end II'dian political leaders. The present writer, while subsequently on holiday in Countt Galvay,...
moreIn the British Parliament, L81'.1906", which suggested the interesting avenue of exploring the connection between Irish Hone Rulers end II'dian political leaders. The present writer, while subsequently on holiday in Countt Galvay, Ireland, stumbled across & copy of Prank Thigh O'Donnell's A History: pt_the Irish Parliamentary Party and was confiraed In his rather tentative idea of e'cwnlntng the validity of the extraordinary o].ains and allegation. oonta.tn.d within this work. Irish biographies, memoirs, and histories, revealed litti. about 0 'Ibnnell and nothing at all about the Xndian intereet of the Irish Parliamentary party under either Isaac Butt or Qiarles Stewart Parnell. That this investigation developed into a reappraisal of the Home Rule movenent between 1870 and 1386 from the angle Of it. significance in the extended empire, is due partly to circumstance, partly to di.. cuasiens on the enbj eat with Mr. Owen Dudley Edwards of Edinburgh tbiyer.ity. Mr. Edwards 'a"ged to conjure up the flavour of the period and almost to bring the character. involved, not least 0 'Ibimell him.. self, to life, a. only en Irishnan can do. It is doubtful whether, without hi. invaluable advice and criticism, the writer would have been able to negotiate the many pitfalls of a hitherto unt4llr field. The greatest debt, however, is to Professor V.0. Kiernan who, despit. the numerous oa1l on his time, provided over tour years of research vital though alway, tactful counsel and supervision. With the benefit of Prof.ssor' Kiernan 'a profound knowledge t Didian and Dtperial }Lt.tory, the writer was able to tackle, it not always to overcame, the ap.cial problem involved in the coorthation of several diitinct, but overlapping, themes. xi The Nation, a weekly journal edited by A. M. Sullivan from 1856 to 1877, and then by T. D. Sullivan, was committed at a very early stage to an obstructive parliamentary policy, and took a much more extreme line on political tactics, on land_reform, and on self-government. While it advocated C'Donnell's interventionist policy it seemed to look on imperial affairs from the narrow focus of Ireland's self-interest. By and large, "1ngland's difficulty, Ireland's opportunity", O'Connell's old slogan, represented its attitude to Britain's foreign cocuplicatiorls. Founded in 1870, PatrIck Ford's Irish World, which had the largest circulation of any weekly in the United States and which, with fluctuations, was widely read in Ireland, was emphatically anti-English. A declared enemy of the British empire, the full weight of its propaganda was directed towards the destruction of the Union and of British power throughout the world. In effect, it was a vehicle not only for Ford's views about a universal crusade against landlordism, but also of Fenian attitudes towards the empire. No real study has been made by the writer of United Ireland, a left wing Parnellite paper founded in 1881, or of Richard Pigott's Flaçj of Ireland and Irishman, both written from a popular pro- Fenian standpoint. Fenian papers and Police and Crime Records in the State Paper Office, Dublin, are of special interest for the history of the Land League and National League • They contain, among other things, reports furnished by local District Inspectors of the Ro yal Irish Constabulary of the Land League meetings and speeches, which are helpful in estimating the popular awareness of political struggles elsewhere in the empire. Copies of correspondence from British Consular Agencies in America to the Foreign and Home Offices/ xii Offices also convey some idea of the organisation and subversive activity of the Clan na Gael seen through British eyes. In this respect, the F.O.S. papers in the Public Record Office, London, provide a more complete picture of what was being discussed and planned in Fenian circles, a useful emendation to the valuable John Devoy collection, used here in the published selection of the bulk of its material edited by William O'Brien and Desmond Ryan. Biographies and memoirs of the period yielded very little, either about O'Donnell or about his eccentric views on the empire, although T. M. Mealy in Letters and Leaders of my Day and T. P. in ?eroir g of an Old Par1ianentarian contribute some interesting 'asides'. Michael Davitt's The Pa'1 of Feudalism in Ireland is essential reading for the land agitation, and has an important section on a scheme of democratic intervention for adoption by the Parnellite party in 1883. His impressions of India and his attitude to the empire are discussed in Leaves from a Prison Diary. Despite being an essential cog in the nationalist machine from 1873 to 1906, Alfred Webb strangely remains a very shadowy figure. However, the National Library of Ireland possesses three volumes of his press cuttings together with one or two draft letters (Ms 1745-7], which are relevant to his interest in Indian nationalism and to his tour of duty as President of the Madras Congress. The secondary material on the period is considerable, but apart from I.. P. Curtis's Coercion and Conciliation in Ireland, 1880-1892, and P. N. S. Manaergh's The Irish Question 1840-1921, does/ xiii does not touch on the imperial implications of the Home Rule movement. Mary Cuznpston's article, "Some Early Indian Nationalists and their Allies in the British Parliament, 1851-1906" in Englisi Historical Review (1961), is a possible starting-point and introthction to th, whole subject of the Irish-Indian connection. On the internal organisation and development of the Home Rule party the writer is deeply indebted to the very detailed studies by Dr David Thornley and Dr Conor Cruise O'Brien. Both Isaac Butt and Home Rule and Parnell and his Part 1880-9Q help to place O'Donnell's imperial and interventionist programmes within their proper Irish context. B. Indian In conjunction, the Northbrook, Temple, Lytton, Ripon, Hartington and Dufferin papers, deposited in the India Office Library, provide an extensive range of manuscript material on Indian administration, on aspects of Indian policy, on parliamentary debates on India, on political gossip in London and Calcutta. The letters between the Governors-General and the Secretaries of State, which are the fullest and tend to be at once discursive and frank, throw a good deal of light on the way official policy was arrived at. Letters from political correspondents in England, because they do not take background krowledge for granted, are particularly useful in describing the situation at Westminster. While the activities of the Irish Home Rule Psxty and the twists and turns of the Irish Question are not always a major talking point, they form a constant theme running through most of the correspondence. Lord Ripen, for example, was particularly interested in the Irish land agitation, partly because he had to frame new tenancy and/ xiv and rent legislation for India. Lord Dufferin, the Ulster peer who was Governor-General at the time of the crisis over the first Hqrue Rule Bill and of the formation of Congress, was struck by the concurrence of both events. His papers are remarkable for very pronounced views on nationalist agitation, Irish and Indian. The Charles James O'Donnell saga, his quarrel with the Bengal Government over several years, the nature of the complaints against him, is well documented and preserved in the Rijon collection. Published Parliamentary papers, Indian Proceedings and India Office Departmental records, were of value for their official accou'itc of the Bengal famine of 1874, the remission of the cotton duties, the lowering of the age limit for I.C.S. candidates, the Vernacular Press Act, the Afghan War of 1878-80, and mining speculation in Mysore State. Most of the material for the specialist study.of Indian Gaol Reform (Chapter Nine) is also derived from these sources. The Parliamentary Debates, which have been extensively used, touch on most of these issues, as well as conveying the degree of interest felt by the average M.P. in Indian grievances and the extent to which these stirred the political scene. In the absence of readily accessible Indian private papers, it is difficult to talk confidently about "Indian nationalist" opinion, at least in reference to leading political figures. However, as in Ireland newspapers represented various sections of the politically consc*us. The Bengali English-language pr.ss, largely, as the first to flourish, taking the lead in native journalism, was the most important, and its influence spread throughout/ xv throughout India. Calcutta was not only the administrative capital and seat of government, it also had the largest number of news. papers. Pride of place is usually accorded to the Hindoo Patriot, a weekly journal edited at that time by the highly respected Kristodas Pal • This was the first newspaper to openly acknow.. ledge and court the services of the Irish Home Rule party and of Frank Hugh Dnnell in particular. However, because it was closely allied with aristocratic and landowning interests, and was in fact the acknowledged organ of the British Indian Association, it took a fundamentally conservative position on social matters. After the death of Kristodas Pal in 1834 it gradually drifted away from the mainstream of nationalist life. On the other band, the rival Bengalee, which under Surendranath Banerjes editorship atterpted to speak for the educated middle classes, took a more advanced line not only on land tenure and semindar-rijot relations, but also on constitutional agitation. Its awareness and knowledge of the Irish struggle for self-government was the most acute. The Indian Mirror, which became the only Indian-edited Englishlanguage daily in Northern India, fell somewhere between the two, not as socially conservative as the former nor as politically motivated as the latter, but responding with generosity and readiness to O'Donnell's 1883 initiative and to the call for national unity. The Mahratta, launched...