Key research themes
1. How do political elites strategically select and modify electoral systems to maximize their representation and control?
This body of research investigates the strategic logic behind the choice and modification of electoral systems by ruling parties or elites, focusing on how these agents anticipate and respond to changes in the electoral arena (e.g., voter expansions, emergence of new parties). Understanding these mechanisms is crucial because electoral systems are not neutral institutional frameworks but are actively shaped to serve the interests of elites, affecting political stability, party systems, and representation.
2. What are the operational impacts and representational consequences of different electoral systems on political outcomes, voter behavior, and government formation?
This research focuses on empirically assessing how different electoral formulas—majoritarian/plurality, proportional representation, and mixed systems—influence political party systems, government types (e.g., majority vs. coalition governments), voter strategic behavior (such as tactical voting), and the extent of congruence between public opinion and government policy. Understanding these operational consequences informs normative debates about the desirability and trade-offs involved in electoral system design.
3. What are the definitional complexities, categorizations, and normative debates concerning mixed and hybrid electoral systems, and how do expert preferences reflect uncertainties in their advantages?
This cluster addresses challenges in conceptualizing mixed electoral systems, the proliferation of mixed or hybrid models combining elements of plurality and proportional representation, and the normative and empirical debates that underpin their evaluation. It also reflects on scholars’ preferences (notably for mixed member proportional systems) despite epistemic uncertainties regarding their comparative advantages, highlighting areas for future research and theoretical refinement.