This article analyscs the rclationship b('twcen digital tcchnology and política[ film-making in thc current era of unevcn globalization. First, I study thc role of contemporary counter-narratives of mi¿.,:rratíon in gíving visibílity to...
moreThis article analyscs the rclationship b('twcen digital tcchnology and política[ film-making in thc current era of unevcn globalization. First, I study thc role of contemporary counter-narratives of mi¿.,:rratíon in gíving visibílity to thc illcgal bodies-in-motion that circulatc through the westem fortrcsses. Second, 1 disscct the di,1,.,rital and imperfect acsthctic of a set of films-Welcome to Sarajcvo (Michael Winterbottom, 1997), In this World (Michacl Winterbottom, 2002) and Turtles can Hy (Bahman Ghobadi, 2004) -in order to define the nuances of thcir poli tícal discourses. Third, l arguc that thc authenticating appeal of digital technology is largely based on thc fact that spcctators toda y cxpericncc thc digital in thcir quotidian lije expericnccs. Thcrcforc, they approach digital products not only as consumers, but also as producers of audio-visual imagcry. Finally, 1 study how these films operate in a limínal space between the flctional and documentary mudesthc fictorcal. l contcnd that thcse films fail to hidc thcir structuring artiftciality. Paradoxically, this failure, in combination with their imperfcct digital look, is the cornerstonc of their capacity to successfully engage an active spectator in thc interrogation of thc spccific sociocultural rcalitícs they explore. By deploying a range of represcntational convcntions working within a varicty of fictional genrcs, they KEYWORDS digital impcrfection immigration political film-making Winterbottom fict<Jreal