This publication is one of the outcomes of the With uniqueness of art expression for inclusive art education project, which is being dealt with on the Faculty of Education on Palacký University in Olomouc. We’re all born with specific...
moreThis publication is one of the outcomes of the With uniqueness of art expression for inclusive art education project, which is being dealt with on the Faculty of Education on Palacký University in Olomouc. We’re all born with specific gifts – whether it is some kind of imaginary talents ready to
be fulfilled or other predispositions, abilities, peculiarities and specifics which make each one of us unique. We tend to think of some of them as “gifts”, particularly when it is a skill, a talent, or “having genes for it”, and we also tent to mark others as inability, flaw or even disability in the sense of impaired ability, of handicap of motorial, sensorial or cognitive area. However, such “in-abilities” often fulfil their potentiality – to varying degrees – only due to the application of certain, not necessary, point of view in which they become alive in opposition to the gifts praised by majority. It is only up to us to decide which point of view we choose for ourselves in order to evaluate. Whether we will believe in existence
of clear, impenetrable line between normality and disability or between ability, talent and inability – or we will admit to ourselves the relativity of the terms and admit that normality is, as well as ableism, eventually only a binding category to us – and that we don’t need to obey it if we do not wish to. The described turn has already occurred both in art, where
people commonly work with uniqueness, originality or otherness, and in art education, which includes all that is necessary for attentive, supportive approach to all students, and for application pro-inclusive approaches in practice. As we will show in our surveillance study, which includes pictorial part – pandan to the exhibition organized in Arts Centre of Palacký University in Olomouc within activities for the With uniqueness of art expression for inclusive art education project – in the last century, art education absorbed all necessary for the realisation of optimal condition, when every child without difference will´have – accordingly to their interest and will – the possibility to use and show their skills. We will firstly introduce the roots of present pro-inclusive, respecting approaches in the book – whether they grow from work of personages of art or special education or psychology or art itself, which have been wonderfully changing during the 20th century and now. The most interesting part of the publication is the picturial part, in which unique works of interesting artists and their pedagogues are reproduced. These works are not only lovely to see and think about but also, they testify of will and need to create.
We try to support pro-inclusive tendencies and respecting approach to children and adults with a mental, sensual or physical otherness in the book. We’ll therefore introduce a relatively new, inspiring field of study called Disability Studies, which rightly highlights persistent social mechanisms of exclusion and stigmatization of people with “disability” which we would like to refuse and eliminate. We deem it right, and in accordance with the condition in art, that this field of study and activism of artists with certain otherness, which is connected to the field, is putting the word disability into quotation marks and deconstructs it as a social, ideological construct opposing normality. We deem it right that disability is not objective or biological fact but more of secondary condition according to the surrounding. It is also essential that it gives voice to people with otherness and lets them speak about their experience with this condition. Disability is not thought of as something primarily negative, something that needs to be cured, remedy or pitty, within this approach – which fully corresponds with up to now findings of current society,
acquired on the way to knowledge of cultural and anthropological fundaments and influence of various postmodern phenomena (plurality included). Disability is deemed normal and so it is possible to perceive it with attention to uniqueness of every person and all in all as primarily neutral, potentially positive more than negative – so that its holders could
identify themselves with pride and could develop their potentialities. This approach would not be possible without up to now knowledge and the journey of our society from stigmatization and repressive or segregating procedures – through charitable and humanistic approaches – to present inclusive approaches. Within art and its theoretical reflexion, it
would not be possible without journey to knowledge of people with disabilities or mental illness and without modernistic refusal of existing forms of portrayal and concept of art as imitation of reality according to esthetical models of renaissance. A change in looking at art of people with a mental or physical otherness and engaging of the perspective of Disability Studies into art education (which we’re observing mainly in North American academic environment and practice) enabled and made easier changes that have occurred because of newly set modernistic esthetical frames. Modern style started to value something else then what art up till then had and while searching for inspiration, it turned to expressions of art, unspoiled from academism, which could be found in certain position particularly with children and untrained people with certain otherness – or in art of natural peoples, forgotten folk culture or art of various untrained solitaires. On this journey, concept of art brut and children art had evolved, a number of artists had been finding value and inspiration in pure, authentic work of children and “weird” adults, collectors, curators and specialists had aimed their focused attention this way, shows had started being organised and the given phenomenon had started to seriously theoretically and empirically examine.
And so, a new, inspiring fountain of creativity and new, fresh expression enriching art of new, novel and in many ways extraordinary shared positions had been found for art (and later for art education, too). A view on gifts and skills to create had also been relativized – and any otherness had no longer been refused, ugly and embarrassing but had become sought-after with the aim to find strong expression, share both new and traditional contents in innovative, non-emptiable forms, to communicate about the essence of human, to search for the human nature again – which many had marked as impaired by civilization, lost or repressed. This publication is also prepared with the cognition of all these contexts. Majority of artists – both children and adults – whose works we reproduce here, is gifted with unnoticeable or visible otherness (from small learning struggles or communication difficulties and mental otherness to inability to use hands or eye), but there is no doubt they’re all gifted. The gift we’re talking about is gift of creativity and art expression. Every one of us is gifted and we can use the gift as much as we want to.