Parikh Motivated Study on Repetitions in Words
2018, ArXiv
Abstract
We introduce the notion of general prints of a word, which is substantialized by certain canonical decompositions, to study repetition in words. These associated decompositions, when applied recursively on a word, result in what we term as core prints of the word. The length of the path to attain a core print of a general word is scrutinized. This paper also studies the class of square-free ternary words with respect to the Parikh matrix mapping, which is an extension of the classical Parikh mapping. It is shown that there are only finitely many matrix-equivalence classes of ternary words such that all words in each class are square-free. Finally, we employ square-free morphisms to generate infinitely many pairs of square-free ternary words that share the same Parikh matrix.
References (20)
- A. Atanasiu, R. Atanasiu, and I. Petre. Parikh matrices and amiable words. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 390(1):102-109, 2008.
- A. Atanasiu, G. Poovanandran, and W. C. Teh. Parikh matrices for powers of words. (Preprint).
- J. Berstel. Some recent results on squarefree words. In Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, pages 14-25. Springer, 1984.
- M. Crochemore. Sharp characterizations of squarefree morphisms. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 18(2):221-226, 1982.
- M. Dudık and L. J. Schulman. Reconstruction from subsequences. J. Comp. Theory A, 103(2):337-348, 2003.
- J. Leech. A problem on strings of beads. Math. Gazette, 41(338):277-278, 1957.
- K. Mahalingam, S. Bera, and K. G. Subramanian. Properties of Parikh matrices of words obtained by an extension of a restricted shuffle operator. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 29(3):403-3413, 2018.
- J. Manuch. Characterization of a word by its subwords. In Developments in Language Theory, G. Rozenberg, et al. Ed., World Scientific Publ. Co., Singapore, pages 210-219, 2000.
- B. Manvel, A. Meyerowitz, A. Schwenk, K. Smith, and P. Stockmeyer. Reconstruction of sequences. Discrete Math., 94(3):209-219, 1991.
- A. Mateescu, A. Salomaa, K. Salomaa, and S. Yu. A sharpening of the Parikh mapping. Theor. Inform. Appl., 35(6):551-564, 2001.
- A. Mateescu, A. Salomaa, and S. Yu. Subword histories and Parikh matrices. J. Comput. System Sci., 68(1):1-21, 2004.
- R. J. Parikh. On context-free languages. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 13:570-581, 1966.
- G. Poovanandran and W. C. Teh. Elementary matrix equivalence and core trans- formation graphs for Parikh matrices. Discrete Appl. Math. (In press), 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2018.06.002.
- A. Salomaa. Connections between subwords and certain matrix mappings. Theoret. Com- put. Sci., 340(2):188-203, 2005.
- A. Salomaa. Independence of certain quantities indicating subword occurrences. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 362(1):222-231, 2006.
- A. Salomaa. Criteria for the matrix equivalence of words. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 411(16):1818-1827, 2010.
- V. N. S ¸erbȃnut ¸ȃ and T. F. S ¸erbȃnut ¸ȃ. Injectivity of the Parikh matrix mappings revis- ited. Fund. Inform., 73(1):265-283, 2006.
- W. C. Teh. On core words and the Parikh matrix mapping. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 26(1):123-142, 2015.
- W. C. Teh. Separability of M-equivalent words by morphisms. Internat. J. Found. Com- put. Sci., 27(1):39-52, 2016.
- W. C. Teh, A. Atanasiu, and G. Poovanandran. On strongly M-unambiguous prints and S ¸erbȃnut ¸ȃ's conjecture for Parikh matrices. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 719:86-93, 2018.