Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Parikh matrices and M-ambiguity sequence

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012012

Abstract

The introduction of Parikh matrices by Mateescu et al. in 2001 has sparked new investigations in the theory of formal languages by various researchers, among whom is Şerbǎnuţǎ. A decade-old conjecture by Şerbǎnuţǎ on M-ambiguous words was recently disproved and this led to new possibilities in the study of such words. In this paper, we will show that by selectively duplicating letters in a word, the M-ambiguity of the resulting words can be continuously altered both finitely and infinitely many times. The changes in the M-ambiguity of those words are then presented in sequences. Finally, a study on the periodicity of such sequences is posed as our future work.

References (23)

  1. Atanasiu A, Binary amiable words. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 18(2):387-400, 2007.
  2. Atanasiu A, Atanasiu R and Petre I, Parikh matrices and amiable words. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 390(1):102- 109, 2008.
  3. Atanasiu A, Martín-Vide C and Mateescu A, On the injectivity of the Parikh matrix mapping. Fund. Inform., 49(4):289-299, 2002.
  4. Atanasiu A and Teh W C, A new operator over Parikh languages. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 27(06):757-769, 2016.
  5. Bera S and Mahalingam K, Some algebraic aspects of Parikh q-matrices. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 27(04):479-499, 2016.
  6. Mahalingam K, Bera S and Subramanian K G, Properties of Parikh matrices of words obtained by an extension of a restricted shuffle operator. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci. (In press).
  7. Mateescu A and Salomaa A, Matrix indicators for subword occurrences and ambiguity. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 15(2):277-292, 2004.
  8. Mateescu A, Salomaa A, Salomaa K and Yu S, A sharpening of the Parikh mapping. Theor. Inform. Appl., 35(6):551-564, 2001.
  9. Mateescu A, Salomaa A and Yu S, Subword histories and Parikh matrices. J. Comput. System Sci., 68(1):1-21, 2004.
  10. Parikh R J, On context-free languages. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 13:570-581, 1966.
  11. Poovanandran G and Teh W C, Elementary matrix equivalence and core transformation graphs for Parikh matrices. (Preprint).
  12. Poovanandran G and Teh W C, On M-equivalence and strong M-equivalence for Parikh matrices. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 29(1):123-137, 2018.
  13. Poovanandran G and Teh W C, Strong 2⋅t and strong 3⋅t transformations for strong M-equivalence. (Preprint).
  14. Salomaa A, Criteria for the matrix equivalence of words. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 411(16):1818-1827, 2010.
  15. Salomaa A and Yu S, Subword occurrences, Parikh matrices and Lyndon images. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 21(1):91-111, 2010.
  16. S ¸erbȃnut ¸ȃ V N, On Parikh matrices, ambiguity, and prints. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 20(1):151-165, 2009.
  17. S ¸erbȃnut ¸ȃ V N and S ¸erbȃnut ¸ȃ T F, Injectivity of the Parikh matrix mappings revisited. Fund. Inform., 73(1):265-283, 2006.
  18. Subramanian K G, Huey A M and Nagar A K, On Parikh matrices. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 20(2):211-219, 2009.
  19. Teh W C, Parikh matrices and Parikh rewriting systems. Fund. Inform., 146:305-320, 2016.
  20. Teh W C, Parikh matrices and strong M-equivalence. Internat. J. Found. Comput. Sci., 27:545, 2016.
  21. Teh W C and Atanasiu A, On a conjecture about Parikh matrices. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 628:30-39, 2016.
  22. Teh W C, Atanasiu A and Poovanandran G, On strongly M-unambiguous prints and S ¸erbȃnut ¸ȃ's conjecture for Parikh matrices. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 719:86-93, 2017.
  23. Teh W C and Kwa K H, Core words and Parikh matrices. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 582:60-69, 2015.