Multiliteracies in Motion: Current theory & practice
Abstract
The realities of new technological and social conditions since the 1990s demand a new approach to literacy teaching. Looking onward from the original statement of aims of the multiliteracies movement in 1996, this volume brings together top-quality scholarship and research that has embraced the notion and features new contributions by many of the originators of this approach to literacy. Drawing on large research projects and empirical evidence, the authors explore practical and educational issues that relate to multiliteracies, such as assessment, pedagogy and curriculum. The viewpoint taken is that multiliteracies is a complementary socio-cultural approach to the new literacies that includes pedagogy and learning. The differences are addressed from a multiliteracies perspective – one that does not discount or undermine the new literacies, but shows new ways in which they are complementary. Computers and the internet are transforming the way we work and communicate and the very notion of literacy itself. This volume offers frontline information and a vital update for those wishing to understand the evolution of multiliteracies and the current state of literacy theory in relation to it.
References (20)
- Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. New York: Routledge.
- Cole, D. R. (2007). Virtual terrorism and the Internet E-Learning options. E-Learning, 4(2), 116-127.
- Cole, D. R. (2005a). Learning through the virtual. CTheory. www.ctheory.net/articles. aspx?id=445.
- Cole, D. R. (2005b). Reading in the future: literacy and the time of the internet. Recon- struction, 5(2). Retrieved 3 February 2008 from http://reconstruction.eserver. org/052/cole.shtml.
- Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
- Deleuze, G. ([1990] 1995). Negotiations, 1972-1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1990).
- Fiumara, G. C. (2001). The mind's affective life: A psychoanalytic and philosophical inquiry. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
- Forgas, J. P. (Ed.). (2001). The handbook of affect and social cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Freud, S. (1953). The interpretation of dreams (J. Strachey, Trans.). In J. Strachey (Ed.), The Pelican Freud library -Volume 4. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
- Hager, P., & Smith, E. (2004). The inescapability of significant contextual learning in work performance. London Review of Education, 2(1), 33-46.
- Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Holland, N. N. (1968). The dynamics of literary response. New York: Columbia Univer- sity Press.
- Jones-Kavalier, B. R., & Flannigan, S.L. (2006). Connecting the digital dots: Literacy of the 21st century. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(2), 8-10.
- Kress, G. R. (2006). Reimagining English: Curriculum, identity and productive futures. In B. Doecke, M. Howie, & W. Sawyer (Eds.), Only Connect: English teaching, school- ing and community (pp. 31-42). Kent Town, SA: Wakefield Press (AATE).
- Kress, G. R., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Masny, D. (2006). Learning and creative processes: A poststructural perspective on language and multiple literacies. International Journal of Learning, 12(5), 147-155.
- Masny, D., & Cole, D. R. (2009). Multiple Literacies Theory (MLT): A Deleuzian per- spective. Rotterdam: Sense publishers.
- New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures, Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
- Spinoza, B. ([1677] 1993). Ethics and treatise on the correction of the intellect. (A. Boyle, Trans.). London: J.M. Dent.
- Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86(1), 57-78.