Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Introduction
Conclusion
References
All Topics
Political Science
Public Policy

A Critical Approach to Climate Change Adaptation

Profile image of Leigh BuliruaruaLeigh Buliruarua

2018

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165448
visibility

…

description

22 pages

link

1 file

Related papers

A Can of Worms-Challenges to Climate Change Adaptation in Developing Countries
Sarah Al-Shurbji

2017

By 2020, up to 250 million people will be exposed to water stress due to Climate Change (CC), and rain-fed agriculture will be reduced by half (IPCC, 2014). By the end of 21 st century, sea-level rise will largely affect populations living on coastal areas and adaptions measures will cost 5-10% of GDP (ibid). And while consequences of CC are global, developing countries are more vulnerable to them (Cambwera and Stage, 2010). For example, Africa's low GPD and having most of its big cities on coastal areas, make it more challenging for them to adapt to CC (OECD, 2003). Moreover, until The Paris Agreement in 2015, developed countries took the lead responsibility in mitigating CC while adaption was more urgent to developing countries (Nunan, 217; IPCC, 2014). This has heightened intensity of the challenges that developing countries face. In this assignment, we will Identify and critically review the challenges developing countries face in adapting to CC by first defining climate change and adaption to frame the discussion, then briefly mention overarching challenges. Then we critically explore two compounded challenges, namely: Weak adaptive capacities and complex hierarchy of adaptation (Prioritization). However, we will conclude that, while developed countries face similar challenges, adaption is harder to attain by developing countries as their challenges intersection with other developmental aspects. And some challenges have resulted from adaptation methodologies themselves. Climate Change, Adaptation and Overarching Challenges To put adaptation measures to CC in context, we have to look at the definitions it has been given to it. In the independent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), CC was defined as changes happening in climate due to human activity or natural variability (IPCC, 2014). Nevertheless, in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) definition, it reflected the role of natural variability as a secondary factor in changes to climate (UNFCCC, 2006a). This suggests that UNFCC wants to prioritize human-led changes in their adaption efforts. When reflecting about CC in the context of developing countries, human-led activities from developed countries are the hegemonic factor (UNFCC, 2006b). Thus leaving CC agenda, which developing countries have little say in, under question. The definition for adaption is still contested too. It has been defined as ""Adjustment in natural or human systems in response to actual or expected climatic stimuli or their effects, which moderates harm or exploits beneficial opportunities" (IPCC, 2001), while the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) defined it as a "Process" , UKCIP as an "outcome" and UNFCCC as "Steps". These definitions lead to different expectations from different stakeholders thus adding to the overarching challenges of adaption on developing countries where stakeholders in development and CC discourse are far more diverse (OECD, 2006). Furthermore, after The Paris Agreement, developing countries

View PDFchevron_right
North-South Climate Justice: Sustainable Development and Climate Change
Richard Kulczak

2013

View PDFchevron_right
Overcoming the Barriers: Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation In Developing Countries
Thomas Tanner

Institute of Development Studies and Tearfund, 2006

View PDFchevron_right
Climate Change Adaptation in Developing Countries: Beyond Rhetoric
Aondover Tarhule

InTech eBooks, 2012

Developing countries face unique vulnerability and adaptation challenges related to climate variability and change as a result of being, on the one hand, more exposed and sensitive, and on the other hand, having less adaptive capacity for dealing with it World Bank, 2010). Also widely accepted is the urgent need for adaptation to combat what the Inter Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) sees as the most likely climate change impacts in the developing world. These include; "reduced crop yields in tropical areas leading to increased risk of hunger, spread of climate sensitive diseases such as malaria, and an increased risk of extinction of 20-30 percent of all plant and animal species." The report continues, "by 2020, up to 250 million people in Africa could be exposed to greater risk of water stress. Over the course of this century, millions of people living in the catchment areas of the Himalayas and Andes face increased risk of floods as glaciers retreat followed by drought and water scarcity as the once extensive glaciers on these mountain ranges disappear. Sea level rise will lead to inundation of coasts worldwide ...people living with the constant threat of tropical cyclones now face increased severity and possibly increased frequency of these events with all associated risks to life and livelihoods" (UNFCC, 2007, p. 5). In the face of such dire consequences, developing countries especially and international organizations, led most prominently by the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; see ), have been hard at work in an attempt to design feasible climate change adaptation policies and actions. The nexus of these efforts between the developing countries and the UNFCCC is a mechanism called NAPA (National Adaptation Programmes of Actions), which were instituted by Decision 5 at the 7 th Conference of Parties (CoP) held in Marrakesh, Morocco, in 2001. These efforts have galvanized political action and provided much needed guidance to developing countries on how to plan for adaptation to predicted climate change impacts. Even more importantly, they have also provided funding mechanisms and commitments from developed countries to help the least developed countries (UNFCC Article 4/3-5) implement adaptation strategies. Despite such seemingly impressive progress, a number of critical issues related to adaptation remain to be resolved if we are to move beyond the rhetoric of broad scale policy www.intechopen.com Climate Variability -Some Aspects, Challenges and Prospects Climate change is expected to impact developing countries more severely because developing countries are more vulnerable. But what is vulnerability and why are developing countries more vulnerable than their developed counterparts? The IPCC (2007, p. 89) defines vulnerability as "the degree to which a system is susceptible to, and unable to cope with, adverse effects of climate change, including climate variability and extremes.

View PDFchevron_right
Investment and adaptation as commitment devices in climate policy deteriorate mitigation
Wolfgang Peters

RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, 2013

Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.

View PDFchevron_right
National adaptation is also a global concern
Teresa Ribera
View PDFchevron_right
Climate Adaptation As Risk Manage-Ment: Limits and Lessons From Disas-Ter Risk Reduction
Lisa Schipper

GECHS Synthesis Human Security in an Era of Global …

View PDFchevron_right
Positioning Adaptation in the Climate Change Debate
Dr Sadhavi Sharma
View PDFchevron_right
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal -Included in the International Serial Directories
Publisher ijmra.us UGC Approved

The solution to the global problem of climate change has been dominated by the concept of mitigation: reduction of the greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming till recent times. The present debate in the global community now centers on how much change and when will this change occur. The focus on prevention in both academic research and practical application of climate change policy has resulted in the neglect of an alternative conception, that of adaptation. The issue of climate change raises difficult issues of science economics and justice. Climate change threatens food security, public health, property and the livelihoods and lives of members of effected communities. This article attempt to discuss why adaptation has traditionally been neglected in the international discourse on climate change, and also why it has come to have greater prominence in more recent studies and policy initiatives and further analyses and breaks down the concept of adaptation into ‗impacts-driven' and ‗vulnerability-based' methods, to argue that only the latter truly takes account of the socioeconomic determinants of climate vulnerability, and thus offers effective adaptive solutions to the challenges posed by climate change. An attempt is made to put forth the situation in India with regard to climate change in India. It is concluded that the adaptation approach needs to be mainstreamed into general socioeconomic policies, in order to ensure that vulnerable populations are able to face up to the challenges of man-made climate change and everyday climatic hazards.

View PDFchevron_right
Rights-based approaches to Climate Change Adaptation
Fiona Southward

University of Essex, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

References (36)

  1. Adger, W., Butler, C., and Walker-Springett, K., 2017. Moral reasoning in adapta- tion to climate change. Environmental Politics, 26 (3), 1-20.
  2. Ayers, J., and Huq, S., 2009. The value of linking mitigation and adaptation: A case study of Bangladesh. Environmental Management, 43 (5), 753-64.
  3. Bassett, T., and Fogelman, C., 2013. Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum, 48, 42-53.
  4. Blicharska, M., et al., 2017. Steps to overcome the North-South divide in research relevant to climate change policy and practice. Nature Climate Change, 7 (1), 21-7.
  5. Cameron, E.S., 2012. Securing indigenous politics: A critique of the vulnerability and adaptation approach to the human dimensions of climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 22 (1), 103-14.
  6. Cochrane, L., 2017. Decolonizing Methodologies [blog]. Available from: www.logan- cochrane.com/index.php/decolonizing-methodologies [Accessed 21 June 2017].
  7. Cochrane, L., and Tamiru, Y., 2016. Ethiopia's productive safety net program: Power, politics and practice. Journal of International Development, 28 (5), 649-65.
  8. Conway, D., and Mustelin, J., 2014. Strategies for improving adaptation practice in developing countries. Nature Climate Change, 4 (5), 339-42.
  9. Corry, O., and Jorgensen, D., 2015. Beyond 'deniers' and 'believers': Towards a map of the politics of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 32, 165-74.
  10. Dahlberg, A.C., and Blaikie, P., 1999. Changes in landscape or in interpretation? Reflections based on the environmental and socio-economic history of a village in NE Botswana. Environment and History, 5 (2), 127-74.
  11. de Vries, J.R., et al., 2017. Where there is no history: How to create trust and con- nection in learning for transformation in water governance. Water, 9 (2), 1-15.
  12. Eriksen, S., et al., 2011. When not every response to climate change is a good one: Identifying principles for sustainable adaptation. Climate and Development, 3 (1), 7-20.
  13. Eriksen, S., Nightingale, A., and Eakin, H., 2015. Reframing adaptation: The polit- ical nature of climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 35, 523-33.
  14. Few, R., et al., 2017. Transformation, adaptation and development: Relating con- cepts to practice. Palgrave Communications 3 [online]. Available from: www. nature.com/articles/palcomms201792 [Accessed 8 November 2017].
  15. Ford, J., et al., 2015. Adaptation in climate change hotspots: Analysis from Africa and Asia. Regional Environmental Change, 15 (5), 747-850.
  16. GCRF, 2017. Global Challenges Research Fund official website [online]. Available from: www.rcuk.ac.uk/funding/gcrf/ [Accessed 21 June 2017].
  17. IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Part A: Global and sectoral aspects: contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: summary for policymakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Kates, R.W., Travis, W.R., and Wilbanks, T.J., 2012. Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109 (19), 7156-61.
  19. Lebel, L., 2013. Local knowledge and adaptation to climate change in natural resource-based societies of the Asia-Pacific. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18 (7), 1057-76.
  20. Manuel-Navarrete, D., and Pelling, M., 2015. Subjectivity and the politics of trans- formation in response to development and environmental change. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 35, 558-69.
  21. Morchain, D., 2015. Our Common Future under Climate Change: Where science meets social justice [blog]. Available from: http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/ blog/2015/07/our-common-future-under-climate-change [Accessed 21 June 2017].
  22. Morchain, D., and DeMaria-Kinney, J., 2016. Stocktaking in Research into-Use: Progress and thinking to date. ASSAR project publication. Print.
  23. Morchain, D., et al., 2016. MALAWI2020: Vulnerability and risk assessment in the tea industry [online]. Oxford: Oxfam International. Available from: http:// policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/malawi2020-vulnerability-and-risk- assessment-in-the-tea-industry-620101 [Accessed 21 June 2017].
  24. Nagoda, S., 2015. New discourses but same old development approaches? Climate change adaptation policies, chronic food insecurity and development interven- tions in northwestern Nepal. Global Environmental Change, 35, 570-79. ODI and Heinrich Boell Stiftung, 2015. 10 Things to Know about Climate Finance in 2015 [online]. Available from: www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/ publications-opinion-files/10093.pdf [Accessed 21 June 2017].
  25. Otto-Banaszak, I., et al., 2011. Different perceptions of adaptation to climate change: A mental model approach applied to the evidence from expert inter- views. Regional Environmental Change, 11 (2), 217-28.
  26. Paavola, J., and Adger, W., 2006. Fair adaptation to climate change. Ecological Economics, 56 (4), 594-609.
  27. Pelling, M., O'Brien, K., and Matyas, D., 2015. Adaptation and transformation. Climatic Change, 133 (1), 113-27.
  28. Preston, B., Yuen, E., and Westaway, R. 2011. Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: A review of approaches, benefits, and risks. Sustainability Science, 6 (2), 177-202.
  29. Rahman, S.M., and Ahmad, M.M., 2016. Perception of local experts about acces- sibility to international climate funds: Case of Bangladesh. Journal of Developing Areas, 50 (3), 53-68.
  30. RCRCCC, 2017. Bridging Science, Policy and Practice: Report of the International Conference on Climate Risk Management. Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre. Print.
  31. Rotman, D., 2016. Hotter Days Will Drive Global Inequality [blog]. Available from: www.technologyreview.com/s/603158/hotter-days-will-drive-global- inequality/?utm_content=bufferf7a21&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter. com&utm_campaign=buffer [Accessed 21 June 2017].
  32. Saravia, V., and Bustillo, J.A., 2010. Hallazgos y relexiones sobre gestión compart- ida de los recursos naturales: Microcuenca de Río Hondo. Print.
  33. Shackleton, S., et al., 2015. Why is socially-just climate change adaptation in sub- Saharan Africa so challenging? A review of barriers identified from empirical cases. Climate Change, 6 (3), 312-44.
  34. Spiegel, R.H., 2017. Drowning in Rising Seas: Navigating multiple knowledge systems and responding to climate change in the Maldives. BA thesis. Pitzer College.
  35. UNFCCC, 2010. The Need for Adaptation [fact sheet]. Available from: http:// unfccc.int/press/fact_sheets/items/4985.php [Accessed 21 June 2017].
  36. Weisser, F., et al., 2014. Translating the adaptation to climate change paradigm: The politics of a travelling idea in Africa. Geographical Journal, 180 (2), 111-19.

Related papers

Rethinking the framing of climate change adaptation
S. P. Udayakumar

A Critical Approach to Climate Change Adaptation, 2018

View PDFchevron_right
Meeting the global challenge of adaptation by addressing transboundary climate risk: A joint collaboration between SEI, IDDRI, and ODI
Magnus Benzie

2018

Meeting the global challenge of adaptation by addressing transboundary climate risk A joint collaboration between SEI, IDDRI, and ODI When negotiating the Paris Agreement, many countries called for a stronger focus on adaptation. This call became more powerful after the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) outlined the high likelihood of unavoidable climate change impacts in its Fifth Assessment Report. The result was Article 7.1. of the Paris Agreement, which established a new-and unprecedentedglobal goal on adaptation. 1 At the time, the 21 st session of the Conference of the Parties (COP21) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) agreed to treat adaptation "in balance" with mitigation. However, mitigation remains the main focus in international debates and analysis on climate change governance. We argue that the critical importance of adaptation is still under-valued in international negotiations. Specifically, the view that adaptation is a local problem is holding back ambition to pursue a global adaptation agenda that seeks solutions beyond the local-to-national level. It is important to recognise that, although Parties have agreed to limit warming to "well below" 2°C, the nationally determined contributions (NDCs) that have been submitted would result in warming closer to 3°C. 2,3 Even this may be optimistic, as the 3°C estimate presumes that countries achieve their targets, which few are on track to do. With this reality as a backdrop, it is imperative to increase adaptation action worldwide and, in so doing, to scale up efforts from the local to the global. This is increasingly articulated by both developing and developed countries around the globe; of the 165 NDCs submitted to date, at least 137 include information about adaptation. 4 In this brief, we argue that adopting a transboundary view of climate risk, which explicitly recognises the interconnections between people, ecosystems and economies in a globalised world, changes the scope and nature of the adaptation challenge, and creates opportunities to reinvigorate international cooperation on adaptation. Specifically, the UNFCCC remains a critical space for coordinating global action on climate change, including building resilience and adapting to the adverse effects of a warmer world. In this respect, the outcomes of UNFCCC negotiations are important for understanding the progress made to date on adaptation, as well as for highlighting gaps, or framing and steering the conversation in new directions. Global negotiations on climate change therefore have a key role to play in adopting and implementing a transboundary framing of climate risk, though other non-climate conventions and processes can play important roles as well. We therefore review recent progress in the international climate negotiations in order to set up a discussion in the second half of the brief about how progress in meeting the global challenge of adaptation might be achieved.

View PDFchevron_right
Put equity first in climate adaptation
Mark Pelling

Nature

ENERGY Better than big new dams is a mix of small ones with solar and wind p.330 BIOETHICS When we cheat death and redo birth, our story shifts p.333 ZOOLOGY Empire-building bird board game is beautiful and useful p.334 CONSERVATION EU must outlaw ivory trading, before its laxity undermines other bans p.336 A family shelters from the rain in Mozambique after Cyclone Idai.

View PDFchevron_right
Vulnerability before adaptation: Toward transformative climate action
Jesse Ribot

Global Environmental Change, 2011

View PDFchevron_right
Who is adaptation for? Vulnerability and adaptation benefits in proposals approved by the UNFCCC Adaptation Fund
Elise Remling

Climate and Development, 2014

Since the Adaptation Fund (AF) became operational in 2007, there has been a vivid discussion about equity and efficiency in how resources (predicted to be scarce) are governed and allocated. One complicating factor is that allocation is often discussed between countries rather than between sub-national causes and groups, and while this approach follows from the UNFCCC context, it is problematic because it ignores the fact that vulnerability is a locally contextualized phenomenon. This paper empirically analyses the portrayal of vulnerability and adaptation benefits in project proposals approved by the AF, and thereby comments on the normative principles of equity and efficiency when allocating funds to developing countries and their vulnerable communities. It does this by evaluating actual decisions made by the AF, which has been operating for some time. We qualitatively analyse all proposals approved as of December 2012 by the Fund's Board. First, we compare the ways that 'particular vulnerability' is justified or not, especially in light of the minimal guidance available. Second, we compare project proponent's statements (or lack thereof) on economic, social, and environmental benefits arising from the suggested projects, and who they would accrue to. Lessons learned with regard to allocation will also be important for the development of the Green Climate Fund, considering that resources are likely to be scarce for some time in comparison with predicted funding needs.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Environmental Law
  • Climate Change
  • Political Ecology
  • Climate change policy
  • Political Science
  • Climate Change Adaptation And Mi...
  • Pathways to decarbonisation
  • Environmental Sustainability
  • Environmental Humanities
  • Introduction
  • Climate change adaptation measures
  • Climate Politics

    • Cited by

    From climate migration to anthropocene mobilities: shifting the debate
    Andrew Baldiwn

    Mobilities

    The Anthropocene epoch,' as Claire Colebrook describes it, 'appears to mark as radical a shift in species awareness as Darwinian evolution effected for the nineteenth century' (Colebrook 2017). The recent outpouring of ontological speculation on the Anthropocene across the humanities and social sciences certainly testifies to such a radical shift. Dipesh Chakrabarty's insights about the Anthropocene are emblematic (Chakrabarty 2009). The Anthropocene, he argues, marks not only the moment in which the human, Anthropos, becomes fully expressed in the Earth System, but also, paradoxically, the moment in which we lose our ability to grasp what it means to be human. Such a perspective captures well a sense in which the Anthropocene marks our passage into a geohistorical interregnum. As we depart from the geologic stability of the Holocene, so we leave behind the conceptual certainties of modernism, not least the fraught separation of Nature and Culture that has underpinned Euro-Western humanism from at least the fifteenth century onwards. Entering now an epoch in which the entanglements of social and geologic life are more and more ratified by the geosciences, it is no wonder that the social sciences and humanities have responded to the Anthropocene thesis by turning to ontological speculation. The Anthropocene is a scary business. Yet while the Anthropocene carries such far-reaching ontological consequences, those writing about it have had surprisingly little to say about the ontological primacy of mobility and movement, the ever-presence of movement in social life, and the insight that mobility is political and thus a fundamental mechanism of social stratification (although notable exceptions include Clark and Yusoff 2017; Colebrook 2017). This is unexpected given that the Anthropocene concept, by re-embedding human ontological awareness in deep time, draws us into ever closer proximity to Earth's geomorphology, its dynamism, its fluidity, the inherent mobility of the Earth system, or what Bronislaw Szerszynski calls 'planetary mobility' (Szerszynski 2016). One of the aims of this special issue of Mobilities on 'Anthropocene Mobilities' is to add to this speculative moment by positioning 'mobility' as a key term of reference for thinking with, through and against, the Anthropocene as either a philosophical problem, a political concept, a material condition, or an epoch of deep time. But if 'mobility' has been a somewhat muted category within discussions of the Anthropocene, so also it would seem the Anthropocene has been held to the peripheries of the mobility paradigm. A cursory keyword search of Mobilities, for example, suggests that concepts of 'Anthropocene', 'climate change' (i.e. impacts) and the 'environment' (i.e., the milieu of bio-and geophysical relations) have all played a relatively minor role in the mobilities paradigm since the inaugural issue of Mobilities in 2006 (notable exceptions include Szerszynski 2016; Adey and Anderson 2011; Blitz 2011). In pointing this out, however, we are not suggesting that the mobilities paradigm has been somehow oblivious to global environmental crises. Far from it. Urban transportation infrastructure and energy transition have become increasingly significant research foci within the paradigm, at least CONTACT

    View PDFchevron_right
    An IPCC that listens: introducing reciprocity to climate change communication
    Karl Dudman

    Climatic Change

    As the epistemic hand in the UNFCCC’S political glove, the IPCC is charged with furnishing the global dialogues with ‘reliable knowledge’ on climate change. Much has been written about how this body of scientific information can be communicated more effectively to a diverse public, but considerably less so on the role communication might play in making the IPCC itself more receptive to alternative forms of contribution. Climate change communication remains centred on a unidirectional model that has helped climate science achieve greater public legibility, but so far not explored equivalent channels within institutional thinking for representing public and other non-scientific knowledges. Anticipating a new assessment report and major developments for the Paris Agreement, now is an opportunity to consider ambitious pathways to reciprocity in the IPCC’s communication strategy. Drawing on interdisciplinary insights from social science literatures, we argue that communication is not onl...

    View PDFchevron_right
    Is adaptation success a flawed concept?
    Anjal Prakash

    Nature Climate Change

    View PDFchevron_right
    Epistemic injustice, risk mapping and climatic events: analysing epistemic resistance in the context of favela removal in Rio de Janeiro
    Luciana Mendes Barbosa

    Geographica Helvetica

    Environmental and climate justice scholarship has increasingly focused on how knowledge and expertise play into the production of injustice and into strategies of resistance and activist claim making. We consider the epistemic injustice at work within the practices of risk mapping and assessment applied in Rio de Janeiro to justify the clearance of favela communities. We trace how in the wake of landslides in 2010, the city authorities moved towards a removal policy justified in the name of protecting lives and becoming resilient to climate change. We examine how favela dwellers, activists and counter-experts joined efforts to develop a partially successful epistemic resistance that contested the knowledge on which this policy was based. We use this case to reflect on the situated character of both technologies of risk and the emergence of epistemic resistance, on the relationship between procedural and epistemic justice, and on the challenges for instilling more just climate adaptation strategies.

    View PDFchevron_right
    Environmental justice and the politics of climate change adaptation – the case of Venice
    Silja Klepp

    2020

    Abstract. In this intervention, we reflect on the potential of environmental justice and climate justice approaches to reveal the politics of climate change adaptation. Taking the attempts at dealing with extreme flooding events in Venice as an example, we illustrate that different dimensions at the core of the environmental justice concept (distributive and procedural justice and justice as recognition) are helpful to analyse and to politicise climate change adaptation interventions. We call for a transformative research agenda to reconfigure interventions and expertise to more closely account for the socio-political processes and narratives shaping coastal environments and to foster multiple epistemologies. Above all, this entails strengthening the inclusion of local (environmental) knowledge, the involvement of the populations affected by interventions in adaptation planning and the open discussion of political questions and values shaping interventions.

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved