Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Understanding Port Choice Behavior—A Network Perspective

2008, Networks and Spatial Economics

https://doi.org/10.1007/S11067-008-9081-8

Abstract

A novel Network-based Integrated Choice Evaluation (NICE) model is developed to enhance the multinomial logit preference (MNL) model that is widely employed in the existing port choice literature. The NICE model integrates the element of port service network with observational port attributes to identify important quality characteristics on which liner shipping companies base their port choices. An empirical study of the proposed model is conducted through the service schedules of three established liner shipping companies. Results show that port efficiency and scale economies are the more important dimensions influencing liner shipping companies' selection of major Asian ports. Nevertheless, it is important for a competitive port to balance its efforts among all the dimensions.

References (38)

  1. Baird AJ (1996) Containerisation and the decline of upstream urban ports in Europe. Marit Policy Manage 23(2):145-156. doi:10.1080/03088839600000071
  2. Blonigen BA, Wilson W (2006) New measures of port efficiency using international trade data. NBER working paper no. 12052
  3. Cullinane KPB, Khanna M (1999) Economies of scale in large container ships. J Transp Econ Policy 33 (2):185-208
  4. D' Este GM, Meyric S (1992) Carrier selection in a RO/RO ferry trade: part 1. Decision factors and attitudes. Marit Policy Manage 19(2):115-126
  5. Gilman S (1999) The size economies and network efficiency of larger container ships. Int J Marit Econ 1 (1):39-59
  6. Gilman S, Williams GE (1976) The economics of multi-port itineraries for large container Ships. J Transp Econ Policy 10(2):137-149
  7. Hansen WG (1959) How accessibility shapes land use. J Am Inst Plann 25:73-76
  8. Hayuth Y (1991) Load centering competition and modal integration. Coast Manage 19(3):297-311
  9. Hayuth Y, Fleming DK (1994) Concepts of strategic commercial location: the case of container ports. Marit Policy Manage 21(3):187-193
  10. International Institute for Management Development (2006) World competitiveness yearbook. Interna- tional Institute for Management Development, Lausanne
  11. Lattin J, Carroll DJ, Green PE (2003) Analyzing multivariate data. Duxbury applied series. Thomson Brooks, Belmont, pp 127-166
  12. Lloyd's Registered Fairplay (2007) Ports guide. Available http://www.portguide.com/. Accessed between 07 March 2007 to 13 March 2007
  13. Lee LH, Chew EP, Lee LS (2006) Multicommodity network flow model for Asia's container ports. Marit Policy Manage 33(4):387-402
  14. Lee SW, Song DW, Ducruet C (2008) A tale of Asia's world ports: the spatial evolution in global hub port cities. Geoforum 39:372-385
  15. Lirn TC, Thanopoulou HA, Beresford AKC (2003) Transshipment port selection and decision-making behavior: analysing the Taiwanese Case. Int J Logist Res Appl 6(4):229-244
  16. Lirn TC, Thanopoulou HA, Beynon MJ, Beresford AKC (2004) An application of AHP on transshipment port selection: a global perspective. Marit Econ Logist 6:70-91
  17. Malchow M, Kanafani A (2004) A disaggregate analysis of port selection. Trans Res Part E 40(4):317-337
  18. Min H, Guo Z (2004) The location of hub-seaports in the global supply chain network using a cooperative competition strategy. Int J Integr Supply Chain 1(1):51-63
  19. Murphy PR, Daley JM (1994) A comparative analysis of port selection factors. Trans J 34:15-21 National Magazine Co. (2006) Containerisation international yearbook. National Magazine Co., London Nir AS, Lin K, Liang GS (2003) Port choice behavior-from the perspective of the shipper. Marit Policy Manage 30(2):165-173
  20. Notteboom T, Winkelmans W (2001) Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenges. Marit Policy Manage 28:71-89
  21. Parola F, Musso E (2007) Market structures and competitive strategies: the carrier-stevedore arm-wrestling in northern European ports. Marit Policy Manage 34(3):259-278
  22. Polo G, Diaz D (2006) A new generation of containerships: cause or effect of the economic development? J Marit Res 3(2):3-18
  23. Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy. Free Press, New York, p 41
  24. Talley W (2006) An economic theory of the port. In: Cullinane K, Talley WK (eds) Research in transportation economics: port economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam
  25. Taylor MAP, Sekhar SVC, D'Este GM (2006) Application of accessibility based methods for vulnerability analysis of strategic road networks. Netwo Spat Econ 6:267-291
  26. Tiwari P, Itoh H, Doi M (2003) Shippers' port and carrier selection behaviour in China: a discrete choice analysis. Marit Econ Logist 5:23-39
  27. Tongzon JL (1995) Determinants of port performances and efficiency. Trans Res Part A 29(3):245-252
  28. Sanchez RJ, Hoffmann J, Micco A, Pizzolitto GV, Sgut M, Wilmsmeilier G (2003) Port efficiency and international trade: port efficiency as a determinant of maritime transport costs. Marit Econ Logist 5:199-218
  29. Schoner B, Wedley WC (1989) Ambiguous criteria weights in AHP: consequences and solutions. Decis Sci 20(3):462-475
  30. Slack B (1985) Containerization, inter-port competition and port selection. Marit Policy Manage 12 (4):293-303
  31. Slack B (1993) Pawns in the game: ports in a global transportation system. Growth Change 24:579-588
  32. Song DW, Yeo KT (2004) A competitive analysis of Chinese container ports using the analytical hierarchy process. Marit Econ Logist 6:34-52
  33. Sutcliffe P, Ratcliffe B (1995) The battle for med hub role. Contain Int 28(7):95-99
  34. Walter CK, Poist PF (2003) Desired attributes of an inland port: shipper vs carrier perspective. Trans J 42 (5):42-55
  35. Wang M (2005) The rise of container transport in East Asia. In: Lee TW, Cullinane K (eds) World shipping and port development. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, pp 10-33
  36. Wang TF, Cullinane KPB (2006a) The efficiency of European container terminals and implications for supply chain management. Marit Econ Logist 8:82-99
  37. Wang Y, Cullinane KPB (2006b) Inter-port competition and measures of individual container port accessibility. Unpublished paper, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
  38. Wilmsmerier G, Hoffman J, Sanchez RJ (2006) The impact of port characteristics on international maritime transport cost. Res Trans Econ 16:117-140