Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by P.s.j Sudan

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
BLOCK WISE DISTRIBUTION OF BENEFICIARIES OF CHIEF MINISTER SOLAR POWER SCHEME IN KANNTYAKUMARI DISTRICT

Table 1 BLOCK WISE DISTRIBUTION OF BENEFICIARIES OF CHIEF MINISTER SOLAR POWER SCHEME IN KANNTYAKUMARI DISTRICT

Related Figures (11)

Table 6.2 brings out that size of family out of 230 sample, 4 members have family size has a lead role of 80 familie: which is constitute of 34.80 per cent. As followed by 3 members family, 2 members family and 5 members family which i: constitutes of 59 (25.70 per cent), 51 (22.20 per cent) and 40 (17.30 per cent) respectively. As a result, the researcher has founde« that the small size of 4-member families has a lead and dominant role in Kanniyakumari district. TABLE 6.2
Table 6.2 brings out that size of family out of 230 sample, 4 members have family size has a lead role of 80 familie: which is constitute of 34.80 per cent. As followed by 3 members family, 2 members family and 5 members family which i: constitutes of 59 (25.70 per cent), 51 (22.20 per cent) and 40 (17.30 per cent) respectively. As a result, the researcher has founde« that the small size of 4-member families has a lead and dominant role in Kanniyakumari district. TABLE 6.2
ending Status Apart from Subsidies of Distribution of Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District
ending Status Apart from Subsidies of Distribution of Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District
Status of Solar Power Panel is Installed Sample Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District Source: Field Survey
Status of Solar Power Panel is Installed Sample Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District Source: Field Survey
Satisfaction of Solar Power Panel Sample Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District It is inferred that from Table 6.5, out of 230 sample beneficiaries for 154 families are strongly dissatisfied of their solar power panel which is constituted in 67.00 per cent. As followed by strongly satisfied and moderate satisfaction in 40 families and 36 families which is constituted of 17.30 per cent and 15.70 per cent respectively. Therefore, the researcher explains that most of the sample beneficiaries are strongly dissatisfied regarding of their solar power plan in the district of Kanniyakumari which clearly indicated in the figure 5.3.8. Table 6.5
Satisfaction of Solar Power Panel Sample Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District It is inferred that from Table 6.5, out of 230 sample beneficiaries for 154 families are strongly dissatisfied of their solar power panel which is constituted in 67.00 per cent. As followed by strongly satisfied and moderate satisfaction in 40 families and 36 families which is constituted of 17.30 per cent and 15.70 per cent respectively. Therefore, the researcher explains that most of the sample beneficiaries are strongly dissatisfied regarding of their solar power plan in the district of Kanniyakumari which clearly indicated in the figure 5.3.8. Table 6.5
Table 6.6 reveals that satisfaction level of solar panel working status during the rainy season is out of 230 sample beneficiaries for agree their satisfaction has dominant in 90 respondents which is constituted of 39.13 per cent. Followed by the moderate satisfaction, solar panel is not yet installed, disagree satisfaction, strongly dissatisfied and strongly satisfied 79 sample beneficiaries, 25 families, 20 families, 10 sample families and 6 sample beneficiaries which is constituted of 34.35 per cent, 10.87 per cent, 8.70 per cent and 4.35 per cent respectively. Therefore, the researcher indicates that the most of the sample beneficiaries have agree to satisfy their solar power panel working during the rainy seasons in the district of Kanniyakumari.
Table 6.6 reveals that satisfaction level of solar panel working status during the rainy season is out of 230 sample beneficiaries for agree their satisfaction has dominant in 90 respondents which is constituted of 39.13 per cent. Followed by the moderate satisfaction, solar panel is not yet installed, disagree satisfaction, strongly dissatisfied and strongly satisfied 79 sample beneficiaries, 25 families, 20 families, 10 sample families and 6 sample beneficiaries which is constituted of 34.35 per cent, 10.87 per cent, 8.70 per cent and 4.35 per cent respectively. Therefore, the researcher indicates that the most of the sample beneficiaries have agree to satisfy their solar power panel working during the rainy seasons in the district of Kanniyakumari.
Household Awareness about Solar Energy of Sample Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District
Household Awareness about Solar Energy of Sample Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District
Table 5.3.11 indicates that household awareness about the solar energy is out of 230 sample beneficiaries for awareness to know the solar energy in 210 respondents which is constituted of 91.30 per cent. The remaining sample beneficiaries do not know the awareness about the solar energy in 20 respondents which is constituted of 8.70 per cent. Therefore, the researcher notifies that the most of the sample beneficiaries to aware the solar power plant in the district of Kanniyakumari. Table 6.8
Table 5.3.11 indicates that household awareness about the solar energy is out of 230 sample beneficiaries for awareness to know the solar energy in 210 respondents which is constituted of 91.30 per cent. The remaining sample beneficiaries do not know the awareness about the solar energy in 20 respondents which is constituted of 8.70 per cent. Therefore, the researcher notifies that the most of the sample beneficiaries to aware the solar power plant in the district of Kanniyakumari. Table 6.8
lar Power Panel Presently Working Status of Sample Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District Table 5.3.9 explains that the solar power panel presently working status has to understand the study regions. Out of 23( sample beneficiaries for 187 families have good solar power panel working is excellent manner which is constituted of 81.30 pe cent. Followed by the solar power not installed the sample beneficiaries for 25 families which is constituted in 10.90 per cent. The remaining of the sample beneficiaries for 18 families have not working the solar power panel which is constituted in 7.80 pe: cent. Therefore, the researcher founds that the 187 families have dominant role to lead the beneficiaries in the district o Kanniyakumari
lar Power Panel Presently Working Status of Sample Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District Table 5.3.9 explains that the solar power panel presently working status has to understand the study regions. Out of 23( sample beneficiaries for 187 families have good solar power panel working is excellent manner which is constituted of 81.30 pe cent. Followed by the solar power not installed the sample beneficiaries for 25 families which is constituted in 10.90 per cent. The remaining of the sample beneficiaries for 18 families have not working the solar power panel which is constituted in 7.80 pe: cent. Therefore, the researcher founds that the 187 families have dominant role to lead the beneficiaries in the district o Kanniyakumari
Annual Cost of Reducing lkg of CO2 of Sample Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District The study found the hypothesis results, the respondents are not satisfied Operation and Maintenance work for Solar power panel. So, the correlation results are there is a no relationship between O&M and Satisfaction of the respondents. That means out of 230 sample 93.5 % call for that service 42.6 % respondents disagree the service, 29.6 moderate, 26.5 strongly dissatisfied the study. So, the researcher strongly rejects the null hypothesis accepted the alternative hypothesis.
Annual Cost of Reducing lkg of CO2 of Sample Beneficiaries of Chief Minister Solar Power Scheme in Kanniyakumari District The study found the hypothesis results, the respondents are not satisfied Operation and Maintenance work for Solar power panel. So, the correlation results are there is a no relationship between O&M and Satisfaction of the respondents. That means out of 230 sample 93.5 % call for that service 42.6 % respondents disagree the service, 29.6 moderate, 26.5 strongly dissatisfied the study. So, the researcher strongly rejects the null hypothesis accepted the alternative hypothesis.
Notes: 100 W System generates around 0.4 units of energy per day 0.4*30=12 units per month. Carbon emission factor represents the amount of carbon dioxide generated with the use of 1 unit (=1Kwh of energy. The emission for India is 1.33, as given by Brander et al. (2011). It is inferred that from Table 6.10 out of 230 sample beneficiaries for 182 families have consume solar power which is constituted of 80.9 per cent. The remaining of them not yet installed solar panel for 26 families which is constituted 11.56 per cent and solar power is not working situation for 17 families which is 7.56 Further the researcher has to points out that who are the beneficiaries of solar power panel the cost reducing the 1 kg of COz is 2904.72 which implies that environmentally sustain in the study area of Kaniyakumari district. Further absence of the solar system failure the district lost for saved carbon foot print is 686.28. Therefore, the researcher concludes that the solar power plant beneficiaries are cost of reducing the 1kg of COz in the district in Kanniyakumari.
Notes: 100 W System generates around 0.4 units of energy per day 0.4*30=12 units per month. Carbon emission factor represents the amount of carbon dioxide generated with the use of 1 unit (=1Kwh of energy. The emission for India is 1.33, as given by Brander et al. (2011). It is inferred that from Table 6.10 out of 230 sample beneficiaries for 182 families have consume solar power which is constituted of 80.9 per cent. The remaining of them not yet installed solar panel for 26 families which is constituted 11.56 per cent and solar power is not working situation for 17 families which is 7.56 Further the researcher has to points out that who are the beneficiaries of solar power panel the cost reducing the 1 kg of COz is 2904.72 which implies that environmentally sustain in the study area of Kaniyakumari district. Further absence of the solar system failure the district lost for saved carbon foot print is 686.28. Therefore, the researcher concludes that the solar power plant beneficiaries are cost of reducing the 1kg of COz in the district in Kanniyakumari.
Related topics:
Off-grid Renewable Energy TechnologyReduction in Carbon Dioxide Emission
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved