Climate change is a significant challenge for European and national policy agendas, and debates about impacts, costs assessment and enacted strategies by (trans)national and local policies are still in an early phase. However, most...
moreClimate change is a significant challenge for European and national policy agendas, and debates about impacts, costs assessment and enacted strategies by (trans)national and local policies are still in an early phase. However, most Members States of the European Union have adopted National Adaptation Plans through an approach that involves national, regional and local levels, as well as selected stakeholders. A particular focus is also devoted to urban strategies, as Europe is becoming more “urbanised” in terms of population density, spatial planning, human settlements, transport networks and economic flows. The necessity to provide methodologies able to assess costs and benefits of adaptation is urgent. In this way, likely and actual damage impacts and related costs have to be assessed on the basis of specific literature and on innovative evaluation methods, both qualitative and quantitative, involving economic and social aspects of urban life, policies and politics. Furthermore, urban policies are required that are able to ensure good standards of quality of life within the cities, also through climate change adaptation. Adaptation is also intimately related to the concept of vulnerability, because generally a system that is more vulnerable to climate change impacts require more adaptive capacities. However, it is still difficult to translate this relation into costs for adaptation.
The objective of the Annex is thus twofold:
a) to present an overview about how climate change adaptation issues and costs are developed in the current policy agenda in Italy, both at national and urban scale;
b) to point out significant aspects of urban vulnerability, that policy makers and scholars have to consider in future strategies of adaptation to climate change impacts, particularly in the case of extreme rainfall.
The Italian state-of-art will be described through an overview of the climate change
adaptation policies since its earlier steps during the 1990s. Section 2 will analyse and discuss preliminary experiences of costs assessments in relation to flood and heat waves, although they do not present a specific urban target. Some strategies of climate change adaptation will also be presented for some Italian cities and metropolitan areas, summarised in the Table “Italian Cities” at the end of this report. Sections 3, 4 and 5 will discuss two severe floods, occurred in 1970 and 2011 in the Italian city of Genoa. They will be described looking at the damages and related costs assessments as well as on changing vulnerability factors contributing to an increased risk. In this way, a comparison with the RAMSES case studies is carried out in terms of vulnerability aspects (Section 6). In Section 7, adaptation and mitigation strategies, implemented by Genoa to increase the coping capacities with climate change effects, are described as suggestions for those RAMSES case studies with similar vulnerability aspects. Finally, Section 8 will present the experience of the BLUE AP adaptation plan of the Italian city of Bologna as an example of an advanced stage of adaptation plan in an Italian city. The paper proposes five conclusive remarks, also in the way of suggesting main recommendations for the future activities of WP5 and the RAMSES project in general:
1) only recently climate change adaptation has been added to the Italian policy agenda, and related costs assessments have just emerged within the political debate. Thus, updated results about the assessment of adaptation costs in Italy are lacking, but studies of the National Conference on Climate Change (NCCC) since 2007 represent a seminal contribution to provide preliminary results about climate change impacts, such as floods and heat waves. Costs and benefits analysis of climate change adaptation would further allow to understand priority areas of intervention with very constrained budgets, and to indicate the size and the scale of the main challenges in Italy;
2) some Italian cities and metropolitan areas have adopted climate change adaptation plans, even though preliminary and comprehensive adaptation costs are still not definitively integrated within these plans. The Table “Italian Cities”, annexed at the end of the report, reviews some of the existing experiences of adaptation plans in Italian cities. It reveals that strategies mainly aim to cope with floods and heat waves’ risks, particularly focusing on river management and land use policies. These strategies are also integrated in ordinary urban planning tools as well as civil protection activities and grassroots networks;
3) the Mediterranean area is a hotspot in terms of climate change. Settlements are at risk of severe consequences in the near future due to the effects of climate change, including the interruption of main urban functions. Genoa represents an emblematic case study for Mediterranean cities, as it is a crucial hub for road, railway and maritime infrastructure networks in Southern Europe and in the Mediterranean basin. It has been taken as example due to huge potential losses related to climate change impacts such as extreme rainfalls. The high monetary losses value − without considering intangible losses − as experienced in 1970 and the 2011, has shown that the inaction option, or Business As Usual (BUA) scenario, is unsuccessful. In fact, inaction could determine heavy damages, deeply undermining the expected outcomes of sustainable development;
4) damages occurred in 1970 and 2011 events have been high due to some vulnerability conditions characterizing the urban context of Genoa. Urbanization and related issues (such as urban sprawl, land take and soil sealing, abandonment of rural areas) contributed to exacerbate the effects of extreme events damages, by greatly modifying geomorphological conditions in face of inland flooding threat. These factors should be analysed also in the main RAMSES case studies, in order to define specific adaptation measures and, consequently, to address the main related costs. In detail, the review carried out on losses resulting from 1970 and 2011 events in Genoa reports the sectors in which specific adaptation measures are required. In detail, a part from improving ecosystem services (e.g. water absorption capacity of the soil to reduce run off), it is important to develop adaptation strategies even for infrastructures, with a focus on transport and services (gas and water pipelines). Despite the fact that they have been seriously damaged and that they have caused indirect impacts in other sectors (e.g. industries, commerce, etc.) Genoa has not yet adopted an adaptation plan. However, for the future, the city can take advantage to a considerable set of data collected by other initiatives and research projects, recently developed in terms of both mitigation and adaptation measures;
5) in the Italian context, climate change adaptation has still not been included in a
comprehensive framework/plan and does still not have a defined cost assessment.
However, a successful experience of an adaptation plan in an Italian urban area is the BLUE AP of Bologna. BLUE AP identifies the targeted areas on the basis of spatial, social and planning characteristics. The aim is to obtain homogeneous development strategies which are inspired by sustainability goals. For the prevention of river floods and heat waves and the conservation of biodiversity, main strategies aim at enhancing river infrastructures, creating green spaces within urban environment, and ensuring a more sustainable management of water resources.