Space astronomy

PICsIT (Pixellated Imaging CaeSium Iodide Telescope) is the high energy detector of the IBIS telescope on-board the INTEGRAL satellite. PICsIT operates in the gamma-ray energy range between 175 keV and 10 MeV, with a typical energy resolution of 10% at 1 MeV, and an angular resolution of 12 arcmin within a \~100 square degree field of view, with the possibility to locate intense point sources in the MeV region at the few arcmin level. PICsIT is based upon a modular array of 4096 independent CsI(Tl) pixels, ~0.70 cm^2 in cross-section and 3 cm thick. In this work, the PICsIT on-board data handling and science operative modes are described. This work presents the in-flight performances in terms of background count spectra, sensitivity limit, and imaging capabilities.

Planetary systems are angular momentum reservoirs generated during star formation. This accretion process produces very powerful engines able to drive the optical jets and the molecular outflows. A fraction of the engine energy is released into heating thus the temperature of the engine ranges from the 3000 K of the inner disk material to the 10 MK in the areas where magnetic reconnection occurs. There are important unsolved problems concerning the nature of the engine, its evolution and the impact of the engine in the chemical evolution of the inner disk. Of special relevance is the understanding of the shear layer between the stellar photosphere and the disk; this layer controls a significant fraction of the magnetic field building up and the subsequent dissipative processes ougth to be studied in the UV. This contribution focus on describing the connections between 1 Myr old suns and the Sun and the requirements for new UV instrumentation to address their evolution during this period. Two types of observations are shown to be needed: monitoring programmes and high resolution imaging down to, at least, milliarsecond scales.

The Fresnel interferometric imager is a new kind of high angular resolution space instrument for the UV domain, and the related astrophysical targets. This optical concept is meant to allow larger and lighter apertures in space than solid state optics. It yields high dynamic range images and same resolution as that of a solid aperture of the same size. The long focal lengths of the Fresnel imager (a few kilometers) require operation by two-vessel formation flying in space. The first vessel holds a large and thin opaque foil punched with thousands of holes: the interferometric array, the second vessel holds the focal instrumentation.

Recently the numerical simulations of the process of reionization of the universe at z > 6 have made a qualitative leap forward, reaching sufficient sizes and dynamic range to determine the characteristic scales of this process. This allowed making the first realistic predictions for a variety of observational signatures. We discuss recent results from large-scale radiative transfer and structure formation simulations on the observability of high-redshift Ly-α sources. We also briefly discuss the dependence of the characteristic scales and topology of the ionized and neutral patches on the reionization parameters.

The paper gives an exact vectorial solution to the Kepler problem. A vectorial regularization that linearizes the Kepler problem is given using a Sundman transformation. Closed form expressions describing the Keplerian motion are deduced. A unified approach to the classic Kepler problem is offered, by studying both rectilinear and non-rectilinear Keplerian motions with the same instrument. The approach is an elementary one and only simple vectorial computations are involved.

A review of the HAXTEL project devoted to the development of a Laue lens telescope for hard X-/gamma-ray observation of the continuum spectra of celestial sources is presented. Main design properties, open issues, the status of the project and an example of multi-lens configuration with sensitivity expectations are discussed.

We developed a new technique for registration of the far solar corona from ground-based observations at distances
comparable to those obtained from space coronagraphs. It makes possible visualization of fine details of studied objects
invisible by naked eye. Here we demonstrate that streamers of the electron corona sometimes punch the dust corona and
that the shape of the dust corona may vary with time.
We obtained several experimental evidences that the far coronal streamers (observed directly only from the space or
stratosphere) emit only in discrete regions of the visible spectrum like resonance fluorescence of molecules and ions in
comets. We found that interaction of the coronal streamers with the dust corona can produce molecules and radicals,
which are known to cause the resonance fluorescence in comets.

Results from photographic observations of the white light solar corona conducted during the total phase of the total
solar eclipse on March 29, 2006 in Manavgat, Turkey are shown in this work. Spectroscopic study of the green 530.3 nm
line of Fe XIV in the corona of the Sun has also been made. The spectrograph was designed by specialists from the STIL-
BAS ‘‘Acad. D. Mishev’’, Stara Zagora Department, Bulgaria; the Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia; and the
Yuri Gagarin Public Astronomical Observatory, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
It has been found that the axis of symmetry of the ‘‘helmet’’-type streamers is tilted towards the solar equator and the
deviations from a radial direction in the western hemisphere are greater than those in the eastern one (211/81).
The solar corona flattening is e ј 0.098, which corresponds to an intermediate (before the minimum) type of corona. We
have obtained that the solar cycle phase is F ј 0.17 for the 2006 TSE.
White light corona is asymmetric, in contrast to solar corona observed during the August 11, 1999 total solar eclipse.

The 10-100 keV region of the electromagnetic spectrum contains the potential for a dramatic improvement in our understanding of a number of key problems in high energy astrophysics. A deep inspection of the universe in this band is on the other hand still lacking because of the demanding sensitivity (fraction of µCrab in the 20-40 keV for 1 Ms integration time) and imaging (≈ 15 ′′ angular resolution) requirements. The mission ideas currently being proposed are based on long focal length, grazing incidence, multi-layer optics, coupled with focal plane detectors with few hundreds µm spatial resolution capability. The required large focal lengths, ranging between 8 and 50 m, can be realized by means of extendable optical benches (as foreseen e.g. for the HEXIT-SAT, NEXT and NuSTAR missions) or formation flight scenarios (e.g. Simbol-X and XEUS). While the final telescope design will require a detailed trade-off analysis between all the relevant parameters (focal length, plate scale value, angular resolution, field of view, detector size, and sensitivity degradation due to detector dead area and telescope vignetting), extreme attention must be dedicated to the background minimization. In this respect, key issues are represented by the passive baffling system, which in case of large focal lengths requires particular design assessments, and by the active/passive shielding geometries and materials. In this work, the result of a study of the expected background for a hard X-ray telescope is presented, and its implication on the required sensitivity, together with the possible implementation design concepts for active and passive shielding in the framework of future satellite missions, are discussed.

A breakthrough in the sensitivity level of the hard X-/gamma-ray telescopes, which today are based on detectors that view the sky through (or not) coded masks, is expected when focusing optics will be available also in this energy range. Focusing techniques are now in an advanced stage of development. To date the most efficient technique to focus hard X-rays with energies above 100 keV appears to be the Bragg diffraction from crystals in transmission configuration (Laue lenses). Crystals with mosaic structure appear to be the most suitable to build a Laue lens with a broad passband, even though other alternative structures are being investigated. The goal of our project is the development of a broad band focusing telescope based on gamma-ray lenses for the study of the continuum emission of celestial sources from 60 keV up to >600 keV. We will report details of our project, its development status and results of our assessment study of a lens configuration for the European Gamma Ray Imager (GRI) mission now under study for the ESA plan "Cosmic Vision 2015-2025".

X-ray-like background has the ability to introduce significant systematic and statistical errors to astronomical measurements from space-based X-ray observatories. Statistical errors from radiation-induced X-ray-like background can dominate the noise in images produced by space-based X-ray telescopes and can severely reduce scientific output. However, the composition and quantity of radiation-induced X-ray-like background events that will be present in a space-based X-ray observatory is not well understood.

The work presented in this thesis has investigated several key research areas. The results of two experimental campaigns are presented, which are used to assess the accuracy of Geant4 at simulating low energy radiation to mimic the space-based environment. Geant4 simulations are then used to predict the particle composition of radiation-induced background in the environment of space.

The composition of background for a detector in a spherical shell spacecraft model is characterised through Geant4 simulations, and it is found that on-chip filters could significantly reduce the background due to electrons and low energy photons. It is also found that for the purposes of maximising signal-to-noise ratio in an ideal detector, there exists an optimal detector thickness for a given particle composition of background.

Finally, key results for investigations into shielding methods include the creation of a mathematical model for the determination of optimal graded-Z shielding locations, and the demonstration that a Helmholtz coil magnetic field structure could be used to significantly reduce the background induced by both low energy fully absorbed electrons, and backscattering electrons.

Much of the simulation work in this thesis was performed on geometries similar to the expected geometry of the Wide Field Imager (WFI) in the European Space Agency’s ATHENA mission as an example of a general X-ray astronomy mission, and to predict the background that will be present in images from the WFI when ATHENA launches in the 2030s.

Early in his Studies in Ethnomethodology, Harold Garfinkel argues that 'doing, recognizing, and using ethnographies' is 'for members a commonplace phenomenon'. He makes an intriguing remark on members' uses of 'anthropological strangeness' in its pursuit. In this paper I aim to contribute a few questions, observations and thoughts on 'members doing ethnography', informed by work in anthropology that has emphasized the uses of translation and irony in cross-cultural understanding. I draw on my ethnography of a team of junior astronomers who prepared a scientific data set for public release and thereby became both inquirers into, and actors in, astronomy's 'culture of open data access', in which there are no natives to talk with, or translate from. I inquire into how these scientists attempted to translate from their quotidian Euro-American culture into this 'culture of open data access', and failed in insightful ways. I also pay attention to their collaborative production of irony in interaction and discuss whether its analysis could function as an 'ethnographic proof procedure'.

We complete our discussion in the previous papers
The Moon Creation And Motion (IV)
The Moon Creation And Motion (V)

Let's remember the last conclusions and left questions for which we write this paper
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to (227.9 mkm) and through its Motion – Mars had collided with Venus and Earth – and from these collisions debris the Earth moon was created – Then we have faced (1st) Question – Why the Earth Moon Diameter is seen as a value created based on geometrical calculation and not by any random process – if the moon created from the collisions debris how to create its diameter based on specific geometrical calculations
- (1st Answer) was- because Jupiter defined The Earth moon mass based on geometrical calculations and the density is defined by the 3 planets densities (Mars- Venus – Earth) – So the moon diameter is created based on geometrical calculations! (2nd Question) was – Why Jupiter defined The Earth Moon Mass?
- (2nd Answer) was – because Jupiter is the inner planets energy source – means – Jupiter defines all inner planets masses and because of that Jupiter defined the Earth Moon mass  (3rd Question) – So- Why Jupiter Mass /Earth mass =318 – what's necessary for this rate?
- (3rd Answer) was – because 318 expresses the Relationship between Earth and Pluto! And Pluto is the important word here – because the solar system main energy is found in the distance between Jupiter and Pluto – (4th Question) – Have Earth & Pluto any effect on the solar system general energy?
(Question No. 4) is the reason why we write this new paper-
This paper is typical the previous both – the introduction provides Mars Migration Theory  - no methodology – in Point No. 2 we will answer the question – Point No. 3 is Mars Migration Theory proves (revision)
(Mars Migration Theory is reviewed because I try to prove it- so we need to remember) 

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Let's summarize the contradiction point in following:
(1)
Lorentz Transformations tell us that – Particle 4 values are changing with high- velocity motion – these values are: Particle Mass, Length, Distance And Time
In our previous discussion- we have concluded that – we have to accept the particle length contraction and mass increasing as real phenomena which can't be illusion of measurements – we have reach to this conclusion based on 2 reasons – (1st) because of the empirical proves for these features (length contraction- mass increasing)- where we need to protect the physical experimental measurements credibility  and (2nd) Because we don't want to make ourselves as The Universe Reference Point.
Shortly
Lorentz Transformations tell that Particle Mass, Length, Distance And Time are changed by the same reason – i.e. they are dealt as similar to each other
(2)
The special theory of relativity is built on Lorentz Transformations
But
In The General Theory of relativity Einstein tells us
"The existence of gravitational field is inseparably bound up with the existence of Space. On the other hand a part of Space may very well be imagined without electromagnetic field," …
……..Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field….
Namely gravitational ether and electromagnetic field or – as they might also be called – Space And Matter   

The Contradiction Point
Lorentz Transformations deal with Space and Matter as equal ….But
The General theory of relativity distinguishes between the space and matter 

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Paper Question
Why Mercury Day Period =175.94 Solar Days?

Let's try to explain this question in following…
I suppose the solar system is one building and each planet is a part of it – for that reason – each planet data is created complementary to other planets data- and no planet is created individually…
Also– because the solar system is one building – so the solar system moves as a train- So as the train moves with its carriages together in one motion –regardless what's first carriage and what's last one – similar to the solar system moves with all planets together spite of Planets Different Velocities – the solar system general unified motion unify these velocities in one motion only –
Based on this description – each planet data effect on the solar system geometry
From this approach the question should be …
Why Mercury Day Period = 175.94 solar days…
But the deep question is another ….let's ask it in following…
Why Mercury Day Period is used in double value (=2 x 175.94 days) generally in the solar system geometry? 
What does that mean? because the solar system is one building – so each planet data is used by other planets – and I have found that Mercury Day Period isn't used as 175.94 solar days but used usually as 351.8 (= 2 x 175.94) solar days –
So – I write this paper to prove this fact and I use it to support the claim that the solar system is one building and each planet data is complementary to the others   
So
this paper has 2 objectives– (1st) to prove Mercury Day Period Using (2nd) to support the claim that the solar group is one building…

Why does Earth Moon Orbit regress?
Abstract
Earth Moon regresses yearly 19 degrees which means 1.44 degrees per month  (Lunar nodes are moving west by about 19° per year)

Paper Hypotheses
1. Moon Orbit Regression proves that "Energy is Transported from Point to another through the solar system"
2. Moon Orbit Regression Energy is transported from Pluto to Uranus to Mercury to Earth Moon Orbit
3. Moon Orbit Regression is A Solar Group General Motion.
i.e. 
- Solar Group is one building and each planet is a part of it. or Solar Group is one machine and each planet is a gear of it.
- Based on that – Solar Planet Motion is not individual or independent motion – on the contrary – all solar planets move together as a train moves with all its carriages
(although solar planets move by different velocities from each other – but they together consist one general motion)

The paper tries to prove these facts

Paper Hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels from Pluto to Earth Axis which creates the connection between Pluto on one side and Earth with her Moon on the other Side
Based on this connection Pluto and the Moon orbit effect on Solar Planets Creation Process

This hypothesis depends on

Solar System General Principle

- Solar group geometrical structure depends on energy of light beam motion (its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec) for one second period

- Light motion (1.16 mkm/sec) for 1 second period causes Planet to move for 1 solar day

Solar Group Creation And Motion
(A description which this paper tries to prove)

1- The Solar System Is created of one energy only -  this one energy travels through the solar group from point to another point – creating the planet matter (because E=mc2) and planet orbital distance (because Space = Energy- My Hypothesis). 
2- The Solar System Main Energy starts from Jupiter and travels to Pluto (from this energy Neptune orbital circumference is created consuming 16% of the total energy) 
3- Neptune reflects the rest of energy toward the inner planets into 2 equal trajectories of energy
4- The Energy is sent from Neptune (and Pluto) to Mercury
5- Energy is sent from Mercury to Saturn

6- Pluto Motion specifically for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second (where this moving light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec – my hypothesis) – that means – 1 second of light motion causes Pluto to move 1 solar day
7- Solar group is created based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day (solar planets diameters total = 406000km= Pluto motion for 1 solar day)

8- Planets motions energies accumulations with 2 other factor effects – lead to produce the sun light beams… these 2 factors are 
a. The sun rate of time is different from Earth one
b. Jupiter Energy Interaction with the planets velocities total
9- i.e. Planets Motions energies total produce the sun rays based on changing the sun rate of time and the interaction with Jupiter energy

10- The produce light beam will be 0.3 mkm/second but the original one is 1.16 mkm/sec – for that – the value 0.3 will multiply with 4……(0.3x4 =1.2 mkm/sec from this value the original light beam 1.16 mkm/sec is produced) (Why it multiplies with 4  - because earth has a cycle of 4 years – 1461 days) 

11- The final product will be 1.16 mkm/sec moves for 1 second only to repeat the cycle for tomorrow…

How the Solar Group is Created? Let's summarize it in following
(The Next Story is hypothesis which we try to prove in this paper)   
(Part I)
1- A light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm travels for 1 second
Based on this light energy Pluto is created and moves for one complete day
(light motion for one second causes planet motion for one complete solar day)

2- Based on Pluto motion for one solar day – the solar group is created
A simplified proof
Pluto Motion Daily =406000 Km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
i.e.
Energy of Pluto Motion for one solar day (406000km) is used to produce planets diameters (at first) and based on these diameters, the planets distances, masses and other data are created….
So
Based on Pluto motion for one solar day the solar group is created and move

3- All planets revolve around the sun in the same direction i.e. the velocities summation is possible

(Part II)

4- Planets Motions Energies are accumulated with help of other factors to produce light velocity
i.e.
Planets Motions Mechanical waves will be accumulated and transformed into light waves (sun rays are produced by planets motions energies accumulation)

5- The produced light continuous for one solar day for us – but it's just one second period relative to the original light beam (because light motion for 1 second causes plant motion for 1 day)

6- The produced light (0.3mkm/sec) needs to multiply with 4 (0.3x 4= 1.2 from which 1.16mkm/sec is produced) – why multiply with 4? Because Earth has a cycle (365 days +365 days +365 days +366 days =1461 days) – and light production process depends on the different rates of time between Earth and the sun (1: 365)

7- The new light beam (1.16mkm/sec) will do the same job for tomorrow  (means …. A light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm travels for 1 second….. the cycle is repeating daily) 

8- The solar group geometrical structure depends on the solar day as a time period

9- So the solar group original light is 1.16 mkm/sec – how the known light velocity 0.3mkm/sec is created?

Based on the Equation

(1.16 mkm/sec – 0.3 mkm/sec) /0.3 mkm/sec = A


Where  A = (1.16 mkm / 0.406mkm)

Please review
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion Part 4)

Where we found that the rate A controls the basic Data in the solar group

Planet Motion Trajectory is NOT An Ellipse
Main Idea
I- Why The Moon Motion Is An Elliptical (or Circular) Trajectory?
- Earth moves daily a distance =2.58 mkm
- Earth motion direction is straight trajectory approximately declines by 0.9856 degrees daily to complete 360 degrees during 365.25 day completing a full revolution around the sun
- The moon has to move by this same data to save his connection with Earth (otherwise The Moon and Earth will be separated from each other)   
Shortly
- Earth moves in straight trajectory with decline 0.985 degrees – the moon motion trajectory can't be a circular or an elliptical trajectory otherwise he will loss the Earth and will separate from her
Let's explain more clearly
- Earth Motion Trajectory is a straight line approximately (daily) because Earth motion declines only 0.985 degrees from the horizontal…. The moon can't move in any circular or elliptical trajectory around Earth –because if he does that earth and moon will be separated from each other!
- But we see the moon moves in elliptical trajectory during the month, revolving around Earth a complete revolution! How to understand that
Because It's A Wrong Vision
- The Moon Motion effects On Our Vision and forces us to see any planet motion trajectory as an ellipse
- The moon himself doesn't move in any elliptical trajectory but the moon motion effects negatively on our vision and forces us to see the moon motion trajectory as an elliptical trajectory…
Conclusion
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is Not An Ellipse – But We See It As An Ellipse Because Of The Moon Motion Effects On Our Vision

During 2013-2019 – I have studied the solar group geometry and discovered the following 5 Equations:

1- Planet Gravity Equation  (Point 2-1)
2- Planet Orbital Distance Equation (Point 2-2)
3- Planet Diameter Equation (Point 2-3)
4- The Sun Rays Production Equation (Point 2-4)
5- Venus Diameter Equation (Point 2-5)
6- An Argument against The Big Bang Theory (Point 2-6)

- The Solar Group Main Energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – This energy sending is continued for 2 sequence solar days 
- Neptune used Jupiter Sent Energy consuming 16% of this total energy and the rest of Energy Neptune reflected it toward the inner planets into 2 Energy Trajectories. 
o 1st Trajectory is sent to Earth (will be discussed Point No.4)   
o 2nd Trajectory is sent to Mercury
- The 1st Trajectory of Energy is reached to Earth (with 86400mkm) – Where Earth reflected this energy into 2 new parts
o Part 1 the energy is sent from Earth to Venus
o Part 2 the energy is sent from Earth to (Jupiter & Uranus)
- The total energy (90000mkm) proves that all energy gathered together on one point only and no contradiction is found…
This explanation shows that the energy passes in cycle through the solar group
The previous idea supports my claim: 
- The Solar Group is One Trajectory Of Energy and each planet is appoint on this same energy trajectory….. or 
- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure (building)- i.e. Each planet data is created to be suitable for the required task of this planet in the whole building …..and
- No solar planet can be found or move independently
a. Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
b. Or, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.

Abstract
This Paper tries To Prove The Following Hypothesis:
Paper Hypothesis

- The Solar Group is Created from One Energy. 

- This One Energy passes through the solar group – to create the planet diameter (matter) and orbital distance (Space)- So the Matter and Space are created from the same Energy to be complementary to each other

- Because The Same Energy passes through the solar group – one thread- the similar values are seen in different units – and so – the different units are found for the same values because the energy is changed from one form to another –relative to the observer…  so the energy is the same but the form is changed and that caused to change the used unit

The Hypothesis Explanation

- Imagine a light beam comes from the sun – it lights our room – and then – this same light beam moves inside a solar cell and produces some electric current – so where's the light beam? It lights the room AND produces the electric current…. The same energy (number) does 2 jobs – and be seen in 2 different units. (Note Please – the light beam energy –which lights our room – equal the energy which produces the eclectic current – 2 Equal Values but 2 different units)

Saturn Effect On The Solar Group Geometry

Saturn shows Clearly The Solar Group Geometrical Structure.

The Basic Hypothesis:
The Solar Group Is One Trajectory Of Energy And Each Planet Is A Point On This Same Trajectory…
i.e.
The Solar Planets (matter is energy because E=mc2) and their orbital distances (Space is Energy – hypothesis)both are created from the same energy which makes
The solar group as one body and each planet is a member of this same body.
Or
The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the solar group is created depending on the cooperation and integration between the solar planets.

Saturn Effect
Saturn tells how the solar group is created based on the previous vision
i.e.
Saturn tells us which planet is created first and which second and what geometrical rule control this creation process.
Shortly
The solar group is one family, all planets are relatives to each other – but Saturn tells us who's brother to whom and who's uncle, who's parent and who's nephew
Saturn Data tells this fact clearly as the sun …Saturn Is The Solar Group Secret

The Main Conclusion
The solar group can't be created by any random process.
i.e. 
The Big Bang Concept is Unreal

The previous conclusion is produced easily and clearly through the solar planets data analysis..
That means…
The Big Bang Theory contradicts strongly and clearly with the solar planets data analysis and their geometrical meanings which supports the claim that, the big bang concept  is Unreal one. 

This paper tries to show and prove this contradiction and to show that the solar planets data analysis is the best way to understand the solar group origin and motion which necessitates to review many other theories concern the solar group origin an motion.

The Hypothesis

                                  "There's No Gravity Found By The Sun"

This paper provides 5 proves for this hypothesis which are:
1- Planet Orbital Distance disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
2- The Sun Gravity Value disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
3- The Planet Velocity disproves The Sun Gravity Concept
4- The moon orbit analysis proves the solar group current description is incorrect.
5- The Solar Group is One Machine consists of all solar planets.

Earth velocity daily (2.58 mkm) = Pluto velocity daily (0.406 mkm) x 2π
The previous relationship is found based on 2 reasons –at least- which are: 

1- Earth and Pluto are the 2 ends of the solar group main energy trajectory.
2- Earth and Pluto Relationship is found through the moon orbit (Earth moon orbit)   
This paper tries to prove these facts.

Abstract
- The rate 1.0725 is found frequently between many solar planets orbital and internal distances (a constant rate)
- I suggest this rate is found because of Lorentz Contraction Phenomenon
i.e.
- There's a difference in velocities = "light velocity" between 2 motions in the solar group (even if we can't measure or notice this velocities difference)
i.e.
There's More Than One Frame In The Solar Group

This paper suggests a clear argument as following:
1. The solar group is created by light beams, but we see these light beams in different forms (as matters and distances)

2. We see the light as matter (Specifically, bright fringes produced by light coherence we see as matters, where dark fringes we see as distances)

3. We see bright fringes as matters because our mind works by light velocity (Mind Thinking Process), so the whole matter around us is found because of the human mind effect.

4. to enable us to see the sun rays, Earth has to move with light velocity relative to the sun, to create a difference in velocities = c velocity

5. So, the sun creation depends on the difference in Earth and Sun motions = c velocity.

6. That's why Lorentz contraction phenomenon is seen in the solar orbital and internal distances, specifically with the constant rate = 1.0725, (which equals 7.25%), where the sun obliquity to ecliptic (7.25 degrees).

7. means, the sun creation process contains Lorentz Phenomenon Effect on the solar orbital and internal distances (and on many other values) 
8. The Distance can be defined as "A Form Of Energy", which is proved by the moon orbit regression yearly 19 degrees (Metonic Cycle) (otherwise how distance can move?) (that supports the claim that, distances are dark fringes produced by light coherence)

This Paper Consists Of 2 Parts
1st Part    : Theory Of Matter Creation
2nd Part    : Application on the theory (the solar group creation from the light) 
 Starting From The Solar Group First Energy
 Explaining The Energy Coherence (light coherence)
 Discovering The Matter Creation
 Providing The Solar Group Motions Harmony Reasons

Abstract
How The Matter Is Created?
Why the particle has double nature?
What's The Gravity Reason And Mechanism? 
Does the gravity needs time to effect or works instantly?

If the Planet moves by gravity, why does the moon revolve the Metonic Cycle which the Earth doesn't?

The Matter Creation is the main question I discuss in this paper, tries to explain why the Particle has double nature..


The Main Hypothesis:

"The Matter Is Made Of Light"

Орел и решка Человека.
______________

Имя «зеленые человечки», носимое Пришельцами, оправданно: кожа их впрямь зелена, и цвет этот, писал Циолковский, дань пище их: как солнцем лист, они кормятся чистым Огнем и с тем есть автотрофы. Цвет серый Гостей, им второй — автотрофия та же: цвет куколки, в метаморфозе живимой не внешнею пищей, а Духом, Огнем Изнутри.