This review of literature is the first of four documents prepared for phase I of the Civic Education Study, under the auspices of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). The more than 20...
moreThis review of literature is the first of four documents prepared for phase I of the Civic Education Study, under the auspices of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). The more than 20 countries that participated in Phase 1 of the IEA Civic Education Study were asked to review the literature in their particular country with respect to 14 sets of questions. The table of contents includes: (1) "Status of Civic Education"; (2) "Priorities in Civic Education"; (3) "Organization of Civic Education"; (4) "Civic Identity Devdlopment"; (5) "Intergroup Relations"; (6) "Criteria for Excellence"; (7) "Conceptions of Citizenship"; (8) "Preparation for Rights and Responsibilities"; (9) "Gender Differehces"; (10) "Social Class"; (11) "Teachers Views and Classroom Climate"; (12) "Pedagogy and Classroom Practice"; (13) "Teacher Preparation: Pre-Service and In-Service"; and (14) "School Organization." (Contains 177 references.) (BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. Literature Review 2 (1981) emphasized that citizenship education has been the primary goal for social studies throughout this century. Although not everyone has agreed on the core content and appropriate methods for teaching social studies, most have rested their case for a particular kind of history, social studies, or social science on a view of citizenship education. That is, various factions have argued for emphasizing history, the social sciences, a problems approach, a global or international perspective, or law-related education as the best preparation for citizenship. However, few argue with the fundamental assumption that one purpose among several, if not the central purpose, for social studies in the curriculum of schools in the United States is to prepare youth for their role as citizens in a democracy. Perhaps indicative of the general public's expectations in this area, 62% of respondents in the 1994 Gallup Poll said they would like more emphasis given to history/U.S. Government while 31% wanted the same emphasis that is given now to history and government. Only 77% wanted less emphasis. That compared to more than 75% who wanted more emphasis on mathematics, English, and science while close to 20% wanted less emphasis on those subjects . Agents of Socialization Family. A longitudinal study by Moore, Lare, and Wagner (1985) is one of the few studies recently to consider the role of the family in political socialization. The researchers interviewed children in five suburban school districts annually from kindergarten until the children completed the fourth grade. The researchers concluded that during the first years of elementary school, the family had the most influence on political interest and information. The young children were primarily influenced by parental comments about candidates, issues, and governmental processes. The researchers noted that although parents passed on their political consciousness, they generally avoided discussions of political tensions and conflicts with young children (Moore, Lare, & Wagner, 1985). Several researchers studying samples of adolescents in the 1960s and 1970s found modest positive correlations between parental political beliefs and those of their children, suggesting that Literature Review 3 the family had an indirect influence. Adolescents often agreed with their parents' general political orientation--conservative or liberal--and political party identification, but they disagreed with their beliefs about specific issues. Interestingly, the students who were most likely to engage in political action were those who came from homes where open discussion of political ideas was encouraged . Additionally, "the greater the amount of discussion in the home, the more likely that the adolescents were highly informed and accepted civic responsibility" (Szymanski Sunal, 1991, p. 295). Parents talking to their children about politics has also been found to relate to student beliefs that they are likely to be politically active adults. Additionally, discussion in the home and anticipated behavior predict later adult participation, according to one longitudinal study . The influence of the family in political socialization is most evident in studies that conclude student political knowledge, attitudes, and participation behaviors are influenced by level of parental education and socioeconomic status