Key research themes
1. How do normative and ethical frameworks shape the conceptualization of 'dangerous' climate change?
This theme investigates the philosophical foundations underlying the notion of 'dangerous' climate change, emphasizing how normative judgments, beyond empirical risk assessment, inform policy targets such as those in the UNFCCC. It addresses the interplay between scientific findings and ethical reasoning, including precautionary principles and the procedural and substantive aspects of defining what constitutes danger in climate policy.
2. In what ways do embodied experience and emotional responses influence ethical engagement and motivation regarding climate change?
This theme explores how the inner dimensions of human experience—such as emotions, somatic feelings, and the lifeworld context—affect ethical responsibility and collective action on climate change. It synthesizes phenomenological accounts of eco-paralysis, the role of anger in climate activism, embodied critical thinking in climate education, and the cognitive-emotional interface in climate policymaking, highlighting how affect and embodiment mediate rationality and motivation for climate action.
3. How do contemporary philosophical and political theories address responsibility, agency, and motivation in collective climate action and policy?
This theme delves into conceptualizations of collective and individual responsibility, the normative challenges of agency in complex climate governance structures, and the political construction of ethical engagement. It addresses how philosophers reinterpret responsibility as a contested social practice, the ethical complexities arising from intergenerational discounting, and the obstacles to political consensus and motivation in climate action, contextualizing these within questions of justice, fairness, and epistemology.