Key research themes
1. How can listener variability and task design influence the reliability of perceptual voice and audio quality assessments?
This research theme focuses on the sources of variability in human perceptual ratings of voice and audio quality, and how experimental design choices (including rating scales, tasks, and listener backgrounds) affect reliability and agreement among listeners. Understanding these factors is crucial for developing standardized and valid clinical and perceptual evaluation protocols that yield consistent and interpretable results, which underpin both subjective assessments and the validation of objective quality metrics.
2. What objective and subjective methods effectively quantify perceptual audio quality across diverse applications, including speech and spatial audio?
This research theme investigates computational models, objective metrics, and subjective testing methodologies used for evaluating audio quality perception in various contexts—ranging from speech communication systems (VoIP), digital audio broadcasting, to spatial audio and ambisonics. The focus is on comparing and validating algorithmic metrics against listener ratings, improving real-time assessment techniques, and extending quality evaluation to emerging audio formats while incorporating perceptual and spatial localization components.
3. How can computational modeling and pilot data aid the selection of stimuli and parameters to optimize perceptual audio and video quality studies?
This theme focuses on methodologies for selecting experimental stimuli, parameters, and degradation levels to maximize the perceptual discriminability and representativeness of audio and video quality assessments. It incorporates techniques such as perceptual similarity distances, multidimensional scaling, and statistical modeling to ensure even coverage of perceived quality ranges in subjective tests, thereby improving the robustness and interpretability of results. These design strategies impact both subjective test efficacy and objective metric validation.