The topic of this dissertation is lithic raw material procurement strategy during the Dalmatian Stone Age. It is based on analyses of lithic artefact assemblages from Late Middle Palaeolithic (Mousterian), Late Upper Palaeolithic...
moreThe topic of this dissertation is lithic raw material procurement strategy during the Dalmatian Stone Age. It is based on analyses of lithic artefact assemblages from Late Middle Palaeolithic (Mousterian), Late Upper Palaeolithic (Epigravettian), Mesolithic, and Neolithic sites. Its primary
focus is the deeply stratified multicomponent cave site of Vela spila on the island of Korčula. This central Dalmatian site yielded Epigravettian, Mesolithic, Neolithic, Aeneolithic and Bronze Age finds. Analyses of lithic artefacts from this site provided the groundwork for investigation of finds
belonging to older, contemporary or younger periods in the region. Lithic assemblages from several other sites located within and outside the region, ranging from Mousterian to the Bronze Age, were used for comparison.
Analysis of flaked stone artefacts involves determination of the raw material source, as well as the mode of raw material acquisition. In this research, archaeological methods, as well as macroscopic
geological and microscopic optical methods were applied. Correlation of artefacts with geological raw material sources was based on extensive fieldwork, a pioneering undertaking in the Adriatic
area. For that purpose, a collection of archaeological and geological samples was created, characteristics of each sample were established by macroanalyses and microanalyses, and recorded in a database. This work resulted in development of a basic methodology and a practical perspective that can be applied to future research within and beyond the region.
Comparative analyses of sites of different ages and geographic locations have provided informa-
tion about the change of lithic raw material procurement strategy. Two basic models of procurement were proposed in order to compare territorial organization and consequences of geomorphological changes on hunter-gatherers and farmers in the research area: the model of eastern Adriatic resources, and the model of western Adriatic resources. These models were applied to prehistoric sites on the eastern Adriatic, and were assigned to specific cultural stages of the analysed sites.
All Mousterian assemblages corresponded to the local model, while Epigravettian and Mesolithic assemblages corresponded to the model of local, local-regional, as well as more distant eastern
Adriatic resources. The model of western Adriatic resources largely corresponded to Neolithic, as well as Aeneolithic and early Bronze Age assemblages.
While some of the assemblages deviated from the assigned models, a general correlation exists between the two major resource zones and the major Stone Age periods. The eastern Adriatic resources model corresponds to pre-Neolithic periods, while the western Adriatic model corresponds post-Mesolithic periods. This fundamental change in procurement strategy is not just a consequence of the transition from hunting to agriculture, but is also related to changes in social context.
Since the beginning of the 6th millennium BC, the social element of the trans-Adriatic neolithisation was expressed by transfer, continuing over a period of several millennia, of technological innovations from the west to the east coast of central Adriatic. This included organized procurement
of raw materials through collection of allochthonous sources and the extraction of autochthonous sources, specialized production of prismatic blades, and overseas distribution. These processes were initiated by the pioneers, taken over by the colonists, and dispersed further through interaction between the incoming farmers and the local hunter-gatherers.