Key research themes
1. How has historical and cultural context shaped literary representations of madness and its intersection with societal norms?
This research area explores the evolution of madness in literature as shaped by cultural, historical, and social frameworks. Works examine how madness is variously portrayed as a social truth, a site of resistance, or a disciplinary tool, especially within patriarchal or oppressive regimes. The theme engages with how madness intersects with societal expectations, gender norms, and cultural trauma, and how literary depictions respond to or critique these forces.
2. What are the linguistic and narrative markers of madness in literature and biography, and how can computational methods enhance their understanding?
This theme investigates the linguistic and narrative characteristics associated with madness in literary texts and biographical writings, focusing on how these markers can be identified, analyzed, and interpreted. It includes the application of computational linguistics and Natural Language Processing (NLP) to track changes related to mental illness in writers' outputs, as well as narrative analyses that explore fragmented language, discourse disruptions, and representational strategies of madness, enriching traditional literary scholarship with empirical and methodological innovations.
3. How has madness been used as a tool of social control and medicalization, especially regarding gender, in literary and historical contexts?
This research track examines madness not only as a psychological or pathological state but critically as a socially constructed and medicalized concept deployed to enforce conformity, discipline, and control, particularly against women. It explores historical psychiatric practices, feminist critiques of psychiatry, and literary representations that reveal madness as a mechanism for marginalizing dissent, with a focus on institutionalization, medical discourse, and the intersectionality of gender and power within madness narratives.