Key research themes
1. How can hybrid modeling integrate top-down and bottom-up approaches to better represent technological and economic interactions in energy systems?
This research area focuses on overcoming the limitations of conventional top-down and bottom-up models in energy-economy systems by combining the detailed technological specificity of bottom-up models with the economic feedbacks captured by top-down models. The hybrid approaches seek to reflect induced technical changes, consumer and firm decision-making more realistically, and monetary-economic feedbacks, thus offering more robust policy analysis tools for energy environment transitions.
2. What methodologies enable effective hybrid modeling and prediction of dynamical systems by blending mechanistic and data-driven representations?
This theme addresses the challenge of leveraging the strengths of parametric mechanistic models and nonparametric data-driven methods to improve modeling and forecasting of complex dynamical systems. Hybrid modeling methodologies replace a subset of mechanistic model equations with nonparametric representations trained from data, enhancing robustness and predictive accuracy, especially under parameter uncertainty, noise, or chaotic system behavior.
3. How can component-oriented hybrid dynamic system modeling using meta-programmable environments enhance compositionality and simulation of complex physical systems?
This research area investigates developing hybrid dynamic physical system models through object-oriented, component-based approaches supported by meta-programming tools. The aim is to enable modular construction of complex, multi-domain hybrid models (combining continuous and discrete dynamics), improve model reusability, and automate synthesis of simulation artifacts to handle system complexity effectively.
4. What formal constraint-based approaches facilitate verification of hybrid systems by discovering inductive invariants expressed as complex polynomial inequalities?
Focusing on verification of hybrid systems, this theme studies constraint-based techniques that systematically search for inductive invariants, including boolean combinations of polynomial inequalities, via formulation as quantified SMT constraints. Innovative use of mathematical tools such as Farkas lemma allows transforming the verification problem into satisfiability problems solvable by modern SMT solvers, enabling formal safety proofs for complex hybrid dynamical models.
5. How can hybrid AI models combining neural networks, genetic algorithms, and fuzzy logic be modularly designed and configured to tackle complex computational problems?
This theme explores the development of unified software platforms that facilitate the construction and experimentation with hybrid AI models by modularly combining diverse AI algorithms. The goal is to harness complementary capabilities of neural networks, evolutionary optimization, and fuzzy logic within an extensible and interchangeable block-based software tool, promoting rapid prototyping and improved problem-solving performance across domains.
6. What frameworks and conceptualizations enable hybrid simulation and modeling to serve as transdisciplinary research enablers across diverse disciplines?
This research direction addresses the integration of multiple modeling and simulation (M&S) methods and cross-disciplinary knowledge to develop hybrid models that span disciplinary boundaries. The focus is on establishing conceptual frameworks to facilitate synthesis of diverse theories, techniques, and domain data into coherent transdisciplinary models supporting complex decision-making and system analysis.
7. How can union models efficiently represent and support reasoning over large model families with variation across spatial and temporal dimensions?
This area investigates formalizing large families of related models (arising from versions, configurations, or uncertainties) into a single union model that retains exact membership information and compactly encodes commonalities. Such union models enhance efficiency and scalability in analysis and reasoning tasks over entire model families in domains including regulatory compliance and product line engineering.
8. What are the benefits and methodological requirements of adopting model pluralism in scientific practice and philosophy?
Model pluralism recognizes the necessity of utilizing multiple diverse models to capture various aspects, scales, and purposes within scientific investigations. This perspective challenges monistic views focusing on single models and calls for appreciation of sets of models with differing functions, promoting pragmatic strategies for explanation, prediction, and intervention in complex phenomena.