Key research themes
1. How is the concept of intelligence defined and distinguished across psychological, sociological, and organizational frameworks?
This research theme focuses on clarifying the multifaceted definitions and theoretical frameworks surrounding intelligence, encompassing its cognitive, emotional, cultural, and organizational dimensions. It addresses the conceptual challenges and debates over whether intelligence is a singular general ability, multiple distinct intelligences, or a broader construct inclusive of nontraditional forms like emotional and cultural intelligence. Understanding these definitions matters for advancing theories of intelligence, improving measurement approaches, and applying intelligence concepts in learning, workplace diversity, and institutional contexts.
2. What is the relationship between intelligence and socio-economic factors such as education, human capital, and economic outcomes at individual and national levels?
This theme investigates how intelligence measures, including IQ and academic achievement tests, relate to human capital formation and macroeconomic indicators. It emphasizes the role of cognitive abilities in fostering institutions, innovation, and economic growth, and critically evaluates commonly used human capital proxies (e.g., years of schooling) in comparison to direct cognitive measures. This research informs socio-economic theory, policy-making, and development economics by linking intelligence research to real-world societal outcomes.
3. How can intelligence studies evolve as an academic discipline distinct from intelligence practice, incorporating interdisciplinary and critical perspectives?
This theme explores the development of intelligence studies as an academic field beyond its current predominant focus on intelligence practice and national security applications. It highlights calls for a critically reflective intelligence discipline that integrates theoretical, historical, organizational, and governance viewpoints, and emphasizes methodological pluralism and institutional legitimacy. Addressing this expands scholarly knowledge of intelligence as a social phenomenon and improves the rigor and relevance of intelligence research.