Key research themes
1. How do cultural and scientific taxonomies interact and diverge in the classification of biological organisms and archaeological cultures?
This research theme investigates the relationship and distinctions between folk (cultural or indigenous) taxonomies and scientific or archaeological classification systems. It evaluates how local or traditional knowledge systems classify plants, animals, and materials—sometimes under different principles or categories than scientific systems—and the implications this has for disciplines like ethnobiology, archaeology, and biodiversity conservation. Understanding this interplay is critical for integrating indigenous knowledge with scientific approaches and for refining archaeological cultural taxonomies.
2. What morphological, ecological, utilitarian, and linguistic attributes do folk and indigenous communities use to identify and classify biological organisms?
This research theme focuses on the specific criteria and descriptive attributes that indigenous and folk communities apply to recognize, name, and categorize biological entities such as plants, animals, fishes, insects, mushrooms, and bees. It examines multidimensional taxonomic criteria including morphological features, sensory perception, utilitarian functions, cultural symbolism, and ecological context. Understanding these descriptive attributes is crucial for ethnobiology, environmental education, natural resource management, and bridging traditional and scientific knowledge systems.
3. How do folk taxonomies address biological/ecological ambiguities and linguistic diversity within local classification systems?
This thematic area examines how folk taxonomies contend with boundary cases, ambiguous species concepts, or inconsistencies that challenge straightforward classification—such as morphological or ecological distinctions that disrupt expected taxonomic categories. It also explores how linguistic and ethnic diversity within trading or cultural contexts affect folk classification, leading to variation, substitution, and complex naming practices. Insights from this theme inform the flexibility and adaptability of folk taxonomies and their implications for conservation, cultural identity, and knowledge transmission.