To assess women's patronage roles in the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries requires the acknowledgement that women's support of the arts transpired within a deeply embedded patron-client arrangement pervasive in European social relations and religious practice. It also requires examination of the period's laws and gender norms. This paper surveys and attempts to categorise how and why a range of European women-from Isabella d'Este in Italy, Catherine de' Medici in France, and various Habsburg queens, in Spain, France, and the Netherlands, to less well known patrons-acquired and made use of the visual arts and architecture in the early modern period. Women and men actively supported art and architecture in all its forms and maintained relationships with canonical artists. They operated, however, in a society that prescribed differentiated male and female roles. In the Renaissance, unlike today, art did not occupy a separate sphere in which artists made largely non-utilitarian creations. Motivated by the desire for salvation, patrons initiated the process, hiring artists and architects to build and decorate churches and provide the liturgical apparatus central to religious practice. At the same time patronage of such works, together with civic and domestic architecture and decoration, enhanced personal and family stature. These connections are clear in an inscription accompanying a painting that Catherine King quoted in her recent book on Italian women patrons of the Renaissance: Ad lectorem. Nobile testata est pingi pia Brisida quondam Hoc opus. O! nimium munera grata Deo. Si petis auctoris nomen. Nicolaus alumnus Fulginae: patriae pulcra corona suae Octo quincties centum de millibus anni, Cum manus imposita est ultima, vanuerant. Sed quis plus meruit, quaeso, te judice, lector Cum causam dederit Brisida et ille manum? RENAISSANCE WOMEN AS PATRONS OF ART AND CULTURE Renaessanceforum 4 • 2008 •
www.renaessanceforum.dk Sheila ffolliott: European Women Patrons SIDE 2 AF 18 To the reader The pious Brisida, now dead, willed that this noble work be painted. Oh! a gift extremely pleasing to God. If you seek to know the artist's name, it is Niccolò L'Alunno of Foligno, beautiful crown of his native land. Eight years from one thousand and five hundred had passed when he put the finishing touches. But who is the more worthy of merit according to you, I ask you, my reader, since Brisida gave the commission, and he the exacting hand? 1 Let us examine the inscription's language. It names the patron and asserts that her commission pleases God. Then it provides the artist's name. Finally, and provocatively, given today's assumptions about art, it asks whether the artist or the patron is more worthy of merit. Significantly, this patron, Brisida, was female. Nevertheless, Francis Haskell's magisterial Patrons and Painters, first published in 1963, the first comprehensive examination of visual arts patronage in early modern Italy, includes very few women. The patrons Haskell examined had great wealth and powerpopes, cardinals, and princes-and collected antiquities and cultivated the artists most prized today. Although many women commissioned artworks, few conform to his model. Those who did were exceptional: rulers like Christina of Sweden or Christine de Bourbon, Duchess of Savoy, with the resources and position to engage in that arena. When Haskell names some women who were active art patrons, like Anna Colonna Barberini in Rome, he provides, however, only the information that she married a male patron. 2 Women actively supported art and architecture in all its forms and some maintained relationships with canonical artists, but that is only part of the story. Why did Haskell ignore the patronage activity of Anna and many women like her? Assessing women's patronage requires a different model, one that takes gender into account. Law denied most women access to money, but there were regional differences and widowhood offered some scope. 3 Gender norms advocated by treatises like Alberti's On the Family (1433-4) to Castiglione's Book of the Courtier (1528) to Juan Luis Vives' treatise A very frutefull and pleasant boke called the instruction of a christen woman (1529?), provided gender-based models for ideal behaviours. Patronage models for women emerging from such sources include the sometimes overlapping categories: pious wife and widow, guardian, court lady, nun, and ruler. Working within and occasionally resisting the implications of these terms, women, by which I largely intend those of aristocratic and royal 1