Key research themes
1. How do treatment modalities influence recidivism reduction among substance-using and mentally ill offenders?
This research area focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of diverse treatment interventions, such as social therapy, psychosocial programs, and therapeutic alternatives to incarceration, in reducing reoffending rates among offenders with substance use disorders and mental health issues. Given the high prevalence of these conditions in offender populations and their complex interaction with criminal behavior, understanding which treatment modalities yield measurable reductions in recidivism is crucial for structuring effective rehabilitative approaches and alleviating systemic burdens such as prison overcrowding.
2. What are the challenges and prospects for integrated offender management and rehabilitation ‘through the gate’?
This theme examines organizational and systemic factors impacting the continuity and effectiveness of offender management from custody through community reintegration. Despite initiatives like the Offender Management Model aimed at providing 'end-to-end' case management by a single probation officer, evaluations revealed substantial implementation shortfalls. Understanding these shortcomings is critical for developing rehabilitative infrastructures capable of reducing recidivism through sustained, coordinated support across prison and postrelease phases.
3. How can assessment tools integrate Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) and desistance principles to enhance offender rehabilitation?
Assessment and sentence planning tools traditionally centered on actuarial RNR frameworks are increasingly scrutinized for their deficits-based approach. This research theme explores the integration of strengths-based desistance principles with RNR and Good Lives Model constructs to create more holistic, individualized assessments that identify offender risks alongside protective factors and personal aspirations. Such innovations aim to improve engagement, co-production, and ultimately rehabilitation outcomes by better aligning interventions with desistance trajectories.