Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Assessing the player interaction experiences based on playability

2014, Entertainment Computing

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENTCOM.2014.08.006

Abstract

Nowadays, video games are the most economically profitable entertainment industry. The nature of their design means that user experience factors make design and/or evaluation difficult using traditional methods commonly used in interactive systems. It is therefore necessary to know how to apply Playability in order to design, analyse, optimise and adapt it to a player's preferences. In this paper, a strong relationship between user experience (UX) and playability is introduced and justified, a characterisation of player experience (PX) is presented based on playability, and a practical method for player experience assessment is described by using the ''Castlevania: Lords of Shadow'' video game to be a. The results offers a mechanism for the evaluation (validation and verification) of the quality of the experience and interaction process and acts as a complementary alternative to the traditional tests performed by the video game industry professionals during the Quality Assurance Process (QA Process) to help to share results, reports and have a global point of view to analyse the final game experience.

References (33)

  1. ISO/IEC 9241-210, Ergonomics of human-system interaction -Part 210, in: Human Centred Design for Interactive Systems, Clausule 2.15, 2010.
  2. E. Law et al., Understanding, scoping and defining user experience. A survey approach, in: Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09), 2009, pp. 719-728.
  3. R. Bernhaupt (Ed.), Evaluating User Experience in Games: Concepts and Methods, Springer, London, 2010.
  4. C.A. Collazos, A.G. Gil, Using cross-cultural features in web design patterns, in: Eighth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), IEEE Press, Las Vegas, 2011, pp. 514-519, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ ITNG.2011.95.
  5. J. Hartmann, A.G. Sutcliffe, A. De Angeli, Investigating attractiveness in web user interfaces, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), ACM, New York, NY, 2007, pp. 387-396, http:// dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240687.
  6. K. Battarbee, Co-experience: the social user experience, in: CHI'03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'03), ACM, New York, NY, 2003, pp. 730-731, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/765891.765956.
  7. D.A. Norman, Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  8. H. Maslow, A theory of human motivation, Psychol. Rev. 50 (1943) 370-396.
  9. S. Brave, C. Nass, Emotion in human-computer interaction, in: J. Jacko, A. Sears (Eds.), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Boca Raton, Florida, 2002.
  10. A. Mehrabian, Manual for the revised trait arousability (converse of the Stimulus Screening), Alta Mesa Road, Monterey, CA, USA, 1994.
  11. E. De Lera, M. Garreta-Domingo, Ten emotion heuristics: guidelines for assessing the user's affective dimension easily and cost-effectively, in: British Computer Society (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI. . .but not as we know it (BCS- HCI'07), vol. 2, British Computer Society, Swinton, UK, 2007, pp. 163-166.
  12. M. Pike, M.L. Wilson, A. Divoli, A. Medelyan, CUES: Cognitive Usability Evaluation System, in: EuroHCIR2012, The Second European Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval, 2012, pp. 51-54.
  13. R. Horlings, D. Datcu, L. Rothkrantz, Emotion recognition using brain activity, in: B. Rachev, A. Smrikarov (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in Computing (CompSysTech'08), ACM, New York, NY, Article 6, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1500879.1500888.
  14. L. Nacke et al., Playability and player experience research, in: DiGRA, Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory, 2009.
  15. K. Isbister, N. Schaffer (Eds.), Game Usability: Advancing the Player Experience, Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, 2008.
  16. J.L. González Sánchez, Playability. How to characterize the player experience in video games (Ph.D. thesis), University of Granada, 2010.
  17. A. Rollings, D. Morris, Game Architecture and Design, New Riders Games, New York, 2003.
  18. S. Swink, Game feel: the secret ingredient, Gamasutra. <http://www. gamasutra.com/view/feature/2322/game_feel_the_secret_ingredient.php>, 2007.
  19. A. Saito, Gamenics and its potential, in: K. Isbister, N. Schaffer (Eds.), Game Usability: Advancing the Player, Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, 2008.
  20. M. Lazzaro, The four fun key, in: K. Isbister, N. Schaffer (Eds.), Game Usability: Advancing the Player, Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, 2008.
  21. A. Järvien et al., Communication and community in digital entertainment services, Hypermedia Laboratory Net (2) (2010). <http://tampub.uta.fi/tup/ 951-44-5432-4.pdf>, 2002.
  22. M. Federoff, Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video games (Master of Science Thesis), Indiana University, 2002.
  23. H. Desurvire, C. Wiberg, Game usability heuristics (PLAY) for evaluating and designing better games: the next iteration, in: A. Ozok, P. Zaphiris (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Online Communities and Social Computing: Held as Part of HCI International 2009 (OCSC'09), Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 557-566.
  24. D. Pinelle, N. Wong, T. Stach, Heuristic evaluation for games: usability principles for video game design, in: Proceeding of the 26th annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2008, pp. 1453-1462.
  25. W.M. van den Hoogen, W.A. IJsselsteijn, Y.A.W. de Kort, Exploring behavioral expressions of player experience in digital games, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Facial and Bodily Expression for Control and Adaptation of Games ECAG 2008, 2008, pp. 11-19.
  26. A. Canossa, A. Drachen, Play-personas: behaviours and belief systems in user- centred game design, in: Human-Computer Interaction -Interact 2009, Pt II, Proceedings, vol. 5727, 2009, pp. 510-523.
  27. M. Chen, E. Cuddihy, A. Thayer, Zhou, Creating cross-cultural appeal in digital games: issues in localization and user testing, in: Presentation at the 52nd Annual Conference for the Society for Technical Communication (STC), 2005. <http://markdangerchen.net/pubs/Game_Slides_final3.ppt>.
  28. N. Padilla Zea, J.L. Gonzalez Sanchez, F.L. Gutierrez Vela, M. Cabrera, P. Paderewski, Design of educational multiplayer videogames: a vision from collaborative learning, Adv. Eng. Softw. 40 (12) (2009) 1251-1260.
  29. K. Poels, W.A. IJsselsteijn, Y.A.W. de Kort, Development of the kids game experience questionnaire, in: Poster Presented at the Meaningful Play Conference, East Lansing, USA, 2008.
  30. K. Poels, W.A. IJsselsteijn, Y.A.W. de Kort, B. Van Iersel, Digital games, the aftermath: qualitative insights into post game experiences, in: R. Bernhaupt (Ed.), Evaluating User Experiences in Games, Springer, Berlin, 2010, pp. 149-165.
  31. J.L. González Sánchez, F.L. Gutiérrez Vela, F. Montero Simarro, N. Padilla-Zea, Playability: analysing user experience in video games, Behav. Inform. Technol. (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.710648.
  32. L. Levy, J. Novak, Game Development Essentials: Game QA & Testing, Delmar Cengage Learning, Clifton Park, NY, 2010.
  33. Castlevania: Lords of Shadow. <http://www.konami.com/officialsites/ castlevania/>.