Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Distributive justice and equity in transportation

2016, Transport Reviews

https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660

Abstract

Over the past decades, transport researchers and policymakers have devoted increasing attention to questions about justice and equity. Nonetheless, there is still little engagement with theories in political philosophy to frame what justice means in the context of transport policies. This paper reviews key theories of justice (utilitarianism, libertarianism, intuitionism, Rawls' egalitarianism, and Capability Approaches), and critically evaluates the insights they generate when applied to transport. Based on a dialogue between Rawlsian and Capability Approaches, we propose that distributive justice concerns over transport disadvantage and social exclusion should focus primarily on accessibility as a human capability. This means that, in policy evaluation, a detailed analysis of distributional effects of transport policies should consider minimum standards of accessibility to key destinations and the extent of which these policies respect individuals' rights and prioritize disadvantaged groups, reduce inequalities of opportunities and mitigate transport externalities. A full account of justice in transportation requires a more complete understanding of accessibility than traditional approaches have been able to deliver to date.

References (77)

  1. area. Annals of Regional Science, 47(3), 499-515. doi:10.1007/s00168-010-0392-6
  2. Beyazit, E. (2011). Evaluating Social Justice in Transport: Lessons to be Learned from the Capability Approach. Transport Reviews, 31(1), 117-134. doi:10.1080/01441647.2010.504900
  3. Bills, T., Sall, E., & Walker, J. (2012). Activity-Based Travel Models and Transportation Equity Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2320, 18-27. doi:10.3141/2320-03
  4. Booth, C., & Richardson, T. (2001). Placing the public in integrated transport planning. Transport Policy, 8(2), 141-149. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00004-X Cass, N., Shove, E., & Urry, J. (2005). Social exclusion, mobility and access. The Sociological Review, 53(3), 539-555. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00565.x
  5. Chakraborty, J. (2006). Evaluating the environmental justice impacts of transportation improvement projects in the US. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 11(5), 315-323. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2006.06.003
  6. Church, A., Frost, M., & Sullivan, K. (2000). Transport and social exclusion in London. Transport Policy, 7(3), 195-205. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00024-X Currie, G. (2010). Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 31-41. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.12.002
  7. Davoudi, S., & Brooks, E. (2014). When does unequal become unfair? Judging claims of environmental injustice. Environment and Planning A, 46(11), 2686 -2702. doi:10.1068/a130346p
  8. Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2011). Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1252-1259. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.02.008
  9. Delmelle, E. C., & Casas, I. (2012). Evaluating the spatial equity of bus rapid transit- based accessibility patterns in a developing country: The case of Cali, Colombia. Transport Policy, 20, 36-46. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.12.001
  10. Dworkin, R. (1981). What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(3), 185-246.
  11. Estache, A., & Gómez-Lobo, A. (2005). Limits to competition in urban bus services in developing countries. Transport Reviews, 25(2), 139-158. doi:10.1080/0144164042000289654
  12. Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  13. Farrington, J., & Farrington, C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 1- 12. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002
  14. Farrington, J. H. (2007). The new narrative of accessibility: its potential contribution to discourses in (transport) geography. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(5), 319-330. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.007
  15. Feitelson, E. (2002). Introducing environmental equity dimensions into the sustainable transport discourse: issues and pitfalls. Transportation Research Part D: Karlström, A., & Franklin, J. P. (2009). Behavioral adjustments and equity effects of congestion pricing: Analysis of morning commutes during the Stockholm Trial. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(3), 283-296. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.008
  16. Karner, A., & Niemeier, D. (2013). Civil rights guidance and equity analysis methods for regional transportation plans: a critical review of literature and practice. Journal of Transport Geography, 33, 126-134. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.017
  17. Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. M., & Joye, D. (2004). Motility: mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4), 745-756. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00549.x
  18. Kawabata, M., & Shen, Q. (2007). Commuting inequality between cars and public transit: The case of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1990-2000. Urban Studies, 44(9), 1759-1780. doi:10.1080/00420980701426616
  19. Kellerman, A. (2012). Potential Mobilities. Mobilities, 7(1), 171-183. doi:10.1080/17450101.2012.631817
  20. Kenyon, S., Lyons, G., & Rafferty, J. (2002). Transport and social exclusion: investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(3), 207-219. doi:10.1016/S0966- 6923(02)00012-1
  21. Khisty, C. (1996). Operationalizing Concepts of Equity for Public Project Investments. Transportation Research Record, 1559(1), 94-99. doi:10.3141/1559-12
  22. Klein, D. B., Moore, A. T., & Reja, B. (2003). Curb Rights Eliciting Competition and Entrepreneurship in Urban Transit (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 473441).
  23. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=473441
  24. Kronlid, D. (2008). Mobility as Capability. In T. P. Uteng & T. Cresswell (Eds.), Gendered Mobilities (pp. 15-34). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  25. Kwan, M.-P. (1998). Space-Time and Integral Measures of Individual Accessibility: A Comparative Analysis Using a Point-based Framework. Geographical Analysis, 30(3), 191-216. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1998.tb00396.x
  26. Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy : an introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  27. Levinson, D. (2010). Equity Effects of Road Pricing: A Review. Transport Reviews, 30(1), 33-57. doi:10.1080/01441640903189304
  28. Litman, T. (2002). Evaluating Transportation Equity. World Transport Policy & Practice, 8(2), 50-65.
  29. Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105-113. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
  30. Lucas, K., Wee, B. van, & Maat, K. (2015). A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. Transportation, 1-18. doi:10.1007/s11116-015-9585-2
  31. Martens, K. (2011). Substance precedes methodology: on cost-benefit analysis and equity. Transportation, 38(6), 959-974. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9372-7
  32. Martens, K. (2012). Justice in transport as justice in accessibility: applying Walzer's "Spheres of Justice" to the transport sector. Transportation, 39(6), 1035-1053. doi:10.1007/s11116-012-9388-7
  33. Martens, K. (2016). Transport justice: designing fair transportation systems [electronic resource]. London: Routledge.
  34. Martens, K., & Golub. (2012). A justice-theoretic exploration of accessibility measures. In K. T. Geurs, K. J. Krizek, A. Reggiani, & Network on European Communications and Transport Activity Research (Eds.), Accessibility analysis and transport planning : challenges for Europe and North America (pp. 195- 210). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  35. Martens, K., Golub, A., & Robinson, G. (2012). A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the United States. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(4), 684-695. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.01.004
  36. Meijers, E., Hoekstra, J., Leijten, M., … Spaans, M. (2012). Connecting the periphery: distributive effects of new infrastructure. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 187-198. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.005
  37. Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge, Mass; London: Harvard University Press.
  38. Miller, H. J. (2006). Social exclusion in space and time. In K. Axhausen (Ed.), Moving through Nets: The Social and Physical Aspects of Travel. London: Elsevier.
  39. Mullen, C. (2012). Mobility (transport). In R. F. Chadwick, Encyclopedia of applied ethics (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 137-144). London: Academic Press.
  40. Mullen, C., Tight, M., Whiteing, A., & Jopson, A. (2014). Knowing their place on the roads: What would equality mean for walking and cycling? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 61, 238-248. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.01.009
  41. Murray, A. T., & Davis, R. (2001). Equity in regional service provision. Journal of Regional Science, 41(4), 577-600.
  42. Neutens, T., Schwanen, T., Witlox, F., & Maeyer, P. D. (2010). Equity of urban service delivery: a comparison of different accessibility measures. Environment and Planning A, 42(7), 1613 -1635. doi:10.1068/a4230
  43. Nordbakke, S., & Schwanen, T. (2015). Transport, unmet activity needs and wellbeing in later life: exploring the links. Transportation, 1-23. doi:10.1007/s11116-014- 9558-x Nozick, R. (2003). Anarchy, state, and Utopia. [electronic resource]. Oxford: Blackwell.
  44. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  45. Ong, P. M. (2002). Car ownership and welfare-to-work. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(2), 239-252. doi:10.1002/pam.10025
  46. Páez, A., Mercado, R. G., Farber, S., … Roorda, M. (2010). Relative Accessibility Deprivation Indicators for Urban Settings: Definitions and Application to Food Deserts in Montreal. Urban Studies, 47(7), 1415-1438. doi:10.1177/0042098009353626
  47. Preston, J., & Rajé, F. (2007). Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(3), 151-160. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002
  48. Pucher, J. (1981). Equity in Transit Finance: Distribution of Transit Subsidy Benefits and Costs Among Income Classes. Journal of the American Planning Association, 47(4), 387-407. doi:10.1080/01944368108976521
  49. Pucher, J. (1982). Discrimination in Mass Transit. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(3), 315-326. doi:10.1080/01944368208976181
  50. Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (revised edition.). Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  51. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness : a restatement. Cambridge, Mass; London: Harvard University Press.
  52. Rietveld, P., Rouwendal, J., & van der Vlist, A. (2007). Equity Issues in the Evaluation of Transport Policies and Transport Infrastructure Projects. In M. S. van Geenhuizen, A. Reggiani, & P. Rietveld (Eds.), Policy analysis of transport networks. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  53. Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen's Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), 61-92. doi:10.1080/1354570022000078024
  54. Robeyns, I. (2005). The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93-117. doi:10.1080/146498805200034266
  55. Ryan, J., Wretstrand, A., & Schmidt, S. M. (2015). Exploring public transport as an element of older persons' mobility: A Capability Approach perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 48, 105-114. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.08.016
  56. Sanchez, T. W., Stolz, R., & Ma, J. S. (2003). Moving to equity: addressing inequitable effects of transportation policies on minorities. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project at Harvard University and Center for Community Change. Retrieved from goo.gl/n18BZY
  57. Sandel, M. J. (2009). Justice : what's the right thing to do? (1st ed. .). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  58. Santos, G., Behrendt, H., Maconi, L., … Teytelboym, A. (2010). Part I: Externalities and economic policies in road transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 28(1), 2-45. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2009.11.002
  59. Santos, G., & Rojey, L. (2004). Distributional impacts of road pricing: The truth behind the myth. Transportation, 31(1), 21-42. doi:10.1023/B:PORT.0000007234.98158.6b
  60. Schweitzer, L., & Valenzuela, A. (2004). Environmental Injustice and Transportation: The Claims and the Evidence. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(4), 383-398. doi:10.1177/0885412204262958
  61. Sen, A. (1979). Equality of what? The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 1, 353-369.
  62. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor books.
  63. Sen, A. (2005). Human Rights and Capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151-166. doi:10.1080/14649880500120491
  64. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.
  65. Smith, N., Hirsch, D., & Davis, A. (2012). Accessibility and capability: the minimum transport needs and costs of rural households. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 93-101. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.004
  66. Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  67. Thomopoulos, N., Grant-Muller, S., & Tight, M. R. (2009). Incorporating equity considerations in transport infrastructure evaluation: Current practice and a proposed methodology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(4), 351-359. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.013
  68. Trinder, E., Hay, A., Dignan, J., … Skorupski, J. (1991). Concepts of equity, fairness, and justice in British transport legislation, 1960 -88. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 9(1), 31 -50. doi:10.1068/c090031
  69. Tyler, N. (2006). Capabilities and Radicalism: Engineering Accessibility in the 21st century. Transportation Planning and Technology, 29(5), 331-358. doi:10.1080/03081060600917629
  70. Van Wee, B. (2012). How suitable is CBA for the ex-ante evaluation of transport projects and policies? A discussion from the perspective of ethics. Transport Policy, 19(1), 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.07.001
  71. Van Wee, B., & Geurs, K. (2011). Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(4). Retrieved from http://www.ejtir.tbm.tudelft.nl/issues/2011_04/abstracts/2011_04_01.asp Van Wee, B., & Roeser, S. (2013). Ethical Theories and the Cost-Benefit Analysis- Based Ex Ante Evaluation of Transport Policies and Plans. Transport Reviews, 33(6), 743-760. doi:10.1080/01441647.2013.854281
  72. Vasconcellos, E. A. de. (2005). Transport metabolism, social diversity and equity: The case of São Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(4), 329-339. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.007
  73. Viegas, J. M. (2001). Making urban road pricing acceptable and effective: searching for quality and equity in urban mobility. Transport Policy, 8(4), 289-294. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00024-5
  74. Wachs, M., & Kumagai, K. (1973). Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio- Economic Planning Sciences, 7(5), 437-456. doi:10.1016/0038-0121(73)90041- 4
  75. Welch, T. F. (2013). Equity in transport: The distribution of transit access and connectivity among affordable housing units. Transport Policy, 30, 283-293. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.020
  76. Winston, C. (2000). Government Failure in Urban Transportation. Fiscal Studies, 21(4), 403-425. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00030.x
  77. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.