Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Conclusions
References
All Topics
Philosophy

Spacetime is as spacetime does

Profile image of Christian WuthrichChristian Wuthrich

2018

Abstract

Theories of quantum gravity generically presuppose or predict that the reality underlying relativistic spacetimes they are describing is significantly non-spatiotemporal. On pain of empirical incoherence, approaches to quantum gravity must establish how relativistic spacetime emerges from their non-spatiotemporal structures. We argue that in order to secure this emergence, it is sufficient to establish that only those features of relativistic spacetimes functionally relevant in producing empirical evidence must be recovered. In order to complete this task, an account must be given of how the more fundamental structures instantiate these functional roles. We illustrate the general idea in the context of causal set theory and loop quantum gravity, two prominent approaches to quantum gravity.

Related papers

Spacetime Emergence in Quantum Gravity: Functionalism and the Hard Problem
Baptiste Le Bihan

Synthese, 2019

Spacetime functionalism is the view that spacetime is a functional structure implemented by a more fundamental ontology. Lam and Wüthrich have recently argued that spacetime functionalism helps to solve the epistemological problem of empirical coherence in quantum gravity and suggested that it also (dis)solves the hard problem of spacetime, namely the problem of offering a picture consistent with the emergence of spacetime from a non-spatio-temporal structure. First, I will deny that spacetime functionalism solves the hard problem by showing that it comes in various species, each entailing a different attitude towards, or answer to, the hard problem. Second, I will argue that the existence of an explanatory gap, which grounds the hard problem, has not been correctly taken into account in the literature.

View PDFchevron_right
Curved Spacetime in the Causal Set approach to Quantum Gravity
Ayush Dhital

2021

Causal Set theory is an approach to quantum gravity. In this approach, the spacetime continuum is assumed to be discrete rather than continuous. The discrete points in a causal set can be seen as a continuum spacetime if they can be embedded in a manifold such that the causal structure is preserved. In this regard, a manifold can be constructed by embedding a causal set preserving causal information between the neighboring points. In this thesis, some of the fundamental properties of causal sets are discussed and the curvature and dimension information of Minkowski, de Sitter, and Anti-de Sitter spaces is approximated using chain length distributions. The accuracy of the results is compared with the continuum manifold and the feasibility of such an approach is discussed. In the first chapter, the need for quantizing gravity is addressed and the concept of spacetime and Lorentz boosts is delineated at length. The second chapter begins with a formal definition of a causal set and delv...

View PDFchevron_right
Quantum spacetime: what do we know
Carlo Rovelli

I discuss nature and origin of the problem of quantum gravity. I examine the knowledge that may guide us in addressing this problem, and the reliability of such knowledge. In particular, I discuss the subtle modification of the notions of space and time engendered by general relativity, and how these might merge into quantum theory. I also present some reflections on methodological questions, and on some general issues in philosophy of science which are are raised by, or a relevant for, the research on quantum gravity.

View PDFchevron_right
Quantum Spacetime without Observers: Ontological Clarity and the Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Gravity
Sheldon Goldstein

Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy, 2012

We explore the possibility of a Bohmian approach to the problem of finding a quantum theory incorporating gravitational phenomena. The major conceptual problems of canonical quantum gravity are the problem of time and the problem of diffeomorphism invariant observables. We find that these problems are artifacts of the subjectivity and vagueness inherent in the framework of orthodox quantum theory. When we insist upon ontological clarity-the distinguishing characteristic of a Bohmian approach-these conceptual problems vanish. We shall also discuss the implications of a Bohmian perspective for the significance of the wave function, concluding with unbridled speculation as to why the universe should be governed by laws so apparently bizarre as those of quantum mechanics.

View PDFchevron_right
Quantum spacetime without observers: Ontological clarity and the conceptual founations of quantum gravity
Sheldon Goldstein

2001

We explore the possibility of a Bohmian approach to the problem of finding a quantum theory incorporating gravitational phenomena. The major conceptual problems of canonical quantum gravity are the problem of time and the problem of diffeomorphism invariant observables. We find that these problems are artifacts of the subjectivity and vagueness inherent in the framework of orthodox quantum theory. When we insist upon ontological clarity-the distinguishing characteristic of a Bohmian approach-these conceptual problems vanish. We shall also discuss the implications of a Bohmian perspective for the significance of the wave function, concluding with unbridled speculation as to why the universe should be governed by laws so apparently bizarre as those of quantum mechanics.

View PDFchevron_right
Out of Nowhere: The emergence of spacetime from causal sets
Nick Huggett

arXiv: History and Philosophy of Physics, 2020

This is a chapter of the planned monograph "Out of Nowhere: The Emergence of Spacetime in Quantum Theories of Gravity", co-authored by Nick Huggett and Christian Wuthrich and under contract with Oxford University Press. (More information at www.beyondspacetime.net.) This chapter sketches how spacetime emerges in causal set theory and demonstrates how this question is deeply entangled with genuinely philosophical concerns.

View PDFchevron_right
Space-time as a causal set
Rafael Sorkin

Physical Review Letters, 1987

We propose that space-time at the smallest scales is in reality a causal set: a locally finite set of elements endowed with a partial order corresponding to the macroscopic relation that defines past and future. We explore how a Lorentzian manifold can approximate a causal set, noting in particular that the thereby defined effective dimensionality of a given causal set can vary with length scale. Finally, we speculate brieAy on the quantum dynamics of causal sets, indicating why an appropriate choice of action can reproduce general relativity in the classical limit.

View PDFchevron_right
Out of Nowhere: Spacetime from causality: causal set theory
Christian Wuthrich

2020

This is a chapter of the planned monograph "Out of Nowhere: The Emergence of Spacetime in Quantum Theories of Gravity", co-authored by Nick Huggett and Christian Wuthrich and under contract with Oxford University Press. (More information at www.beyondspacetime.net.) This chapter introduces causal set theory and identifies and articulates a 'problem of space' in this theory.

View PDFchevron_right
On the Foundation of Space and Time by Quantum-Events
Andreas Schlatter

Foundations of Physics, 2021

The true nature of space and time has been a topic of natural philosophy, passed down since the presocratic era. In modern times reflection has particularly been inspired by the physical theories of Newton and Einstein and, more recently, by the quest for a theory of quantum gravity. In this paper we want to specify the idea that material systems and their spatio-temporal distances emerge from quantum-events. We will show a mechanism, by which quantum-events induce a metric field between material systems, which is governed by Einstein's equation including a cosmological constant.

View PDFchevron_right
Quantum Metaphysics and the Foundations of Spacetime
Cristian Mariani

2022

The main research programs in quantum gravity tend to suggest in one way or another that most (if not all) spacetime structures are not fundamental. At the same time, work in quantum foundations highlights fundamental features that are in tension with any straightforward spacetime understanding. This paper aims to explore the little investigated but potentially fruitful links between these two fields.

View PDFchevron_right

References (52)

  1. Albert, D. Z. (1996). Elementary quantum metaphysics. In Cushing, J., Fine, A., and Goldstein, S., editors, Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal, pages 277-284. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  2. Albert, D. Z. (2013). Wave function realism. In Ney, A. and Albert, D. Z., editors, The Wave Function: Essays in the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Oxford University Press, 52-57.
  3. Albert, D. Z. (2015). After Physics. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
  4. Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., and Zanghì, N. (2008). On the common structure of Bohmian mechanics and the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59:353-389.
  5. Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., and Zanghì, N. (2011). Many worlds and Schrödinger's first quantum theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62:1-27.
  6. Bell, J. S. (1987). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Bombelli, L., Lee, J., Meyer, D., and Sorkin, R. D. (1987). Space-time as a causal set. Physical Review Letters, 59:521-524.
  8. Brightwell, G. (1997). Partial orders. In Beineke, L. W. and Wilson, R. J., editors, Graph Con- nections: Relationships between Graph Theory and other Areas of Mathematics, pages 52-69. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  9. Brown, H. (2006). Physical Relativity: Space-time Structure from a Dynamical Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  10. Butterfield, J. (2011a). Emergence, reduction and supervenience: A varied landscape. Foundations of Physics, 41:920-959.
  11. Butterfield, J. (2011b). Less is different: Emergence and reduction reconciled. Foundations of Physics, 41:1065-1135.
  12. Chalmers, D. (2012). Constructing the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Crowther, K. (2016). Effective Spacetime: Understanding Emergence in Effective Field Theory and Quantum Gravity. Springer, Cham.
  14. Dennett, D. (2001). Are we explaining consciousness yet? Cognition, 79:221-237.
  15. Dowker, F. (2013). Introduction to causal sets and their phenomenology. General Relativity and Gravitation, 45:1651-1667.
  16. Earman, J. (2002). Thoroughly Modern McTaggart: or, what McTaggart would have said if he had read the general theory of relativity. Philosophers' Imprint, 2(3).
  17. Einstein, A. (1916). Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Annalen der Physik, 49:769-822.
  18. Healey, R. (2002). Can physics coherently deny the reality of time? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 50:293-316.
  19. Huggett, N. and Wüthrich, C. (2013). Emergent spacetime and empirical (in)coherence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44:276-285.
  20. Huggett, N. and Wüthrich, C. (forthcoming). Out of Nowhere: The Emergence of Spacetime in Quantum Theories of Gravity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  21. Kim, J. (2005). Physicalism or Something Near Enough. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  22. Knox, E. (2013). Effective spacetime geometry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44:346-356.
  23. Knox, E. (2014). Spacetime structuralism or spacetime functionalism? Manuscript.
  24. Knox, E. (2017). Physical relativity from a functionalist perspective. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.09.008.
  25. Komar, A. (1958). Construction of a complete set of independent observables in the general theory of relativity. Physical Review, 111:1182-1187.
  26. Lam, V. (2015). Quantum structure and spacetime. In Bigaj, T. and Wüthrich, C., editors, Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics, pages 209-228. New York: Rodopi.
  27. Lam, V. and Esfeld, M. (2013). A dilemma for the emergence of spacetime in canonical quantum gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44:286-293.
  28. Lam, V. and Oriti, D. (2018). Philosophical Challenges for Space and Time in Quantum Gravity. Cham: Springer.
  29. Le Bihan, B. (2018). Priority monism beyond spacetime. Metaphysica.
  30. Major, S., Rideout, D., and Surya, S. (2007). On recovering continuum topology from a causal set. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 48:032501.
  31. Major, S. A., Rideout, D., and Surya, S. (2006). Spatial hypersurfaces in causal set cosmology. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23(14):4743.
  32. Malament, D. (1977). The class of continuous timelike curves determines the topology of spacetime. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 18:1399-1404.
  33. Markopoulou, F. and Smolin, L. (2007). Disordered locality in loop quantum gravity states. Clas- sical and Quantum Gravity, 24:3813-3823.
  34. Maudlin, T. (2007). Completeness, supervenience and ontology. Journal of Physics A, 40:3151- 3171.
  35. Maudlin, T. (2010). Can the world be only wavefunction? In Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., and Wallace, D., editors, Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, pages 121-143. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  36. Meyer, D. A. (1988). The Dimension of Causal Sets. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  37. Ney, A. (2015). Fundamental physical ontologies and the contraint of empirical coherence: a defense of wave function realism. Synthese, 192:3105-3124.
  38. Ney, A. and Albert, D. Z., editors (2013). The Wave Function: Essays in the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  39. Ney, A. and Philipps, K. (2013). Does an adequate physical theory demand a primitive ontology? Philosophy of Science, 80:454-474.
  40. Oriti, D. (2014). Disappearance and emergence of space and time in quantum gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46:186-199.
  41. Rideout, D. and Sorkin, R. D. (1999). A classical sequential growth dynamics for causal sets. Physical Review D, 61:024002.
  42. Rideout, D. and Wallden, P. (2009). Spacelike distance from discrete causal order. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 26(15):155013.
  43. Rovelli, C. (1999). 'Localization' in quantum field theory: how much of QFT is compatible with what we know about space-time? In Cao, T. Y., editor, Conceptual foundations of quantum field theory, pages 207-232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  44. Rovelli, C. (2004). Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  45. Rovelli, C. (2011). A new look at loop quantum gravity. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 28:114005.
  46. Rovelli, C. and Vidotto, F. (2015). Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Smolin, L. (2009). Generic predictions of quantum theories of gravity. In Oriti, D., editor, Ap- proaches to Quantum Gravity, pages 548-570. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  48. Sorkin, R. (2005). Causal sets: discrete gravity. In Gomberoff, A. and Marolf, D., editors, Proceed- ings of the Valdivia Summer School. Plenum Press, New York.
  49. Wallace, D. (2012). The Emergent Multiverse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  50. Wüthrich, C. (2012). The structure of causal sets. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 43:223-241.
  51. Wüthrich, C. (2017). Raiders of the lost spacetime. In Lehmkuhl, D., Schiemann, G., and Scholz, E., editors, Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories, pages 307-345. Basel: Birkhäuser.
  52. Yates, D. (forthcoming). Thinking about spacetime. In Wüthrich, C., Le Bihan, B., and Huggett, N., editors, Philosophy Beyond Spacetime. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Related papers

Against the disappearance of spacetime in quantum gravity
Michael Esfeld

Synthese, 2019

This paper argues against the proposal to draw from current research into a physical theory of quantum gravity the ontological conclusion that spacetime or spatiotemporal relations are not fundamental. As things stand, the status of this proposal is like the one of all the other claims about radical changes in ontology that were made during the development of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. However, none of these claims held up to scrutiny as a consequence of the physics once the theory was established and a serious discussion about its ontology had begun. Furthermore, the paper argues that if spacetime is to be recovered through a functionalist procedure in a theory that admits no fundamental spacetime, standard functionalism cannot serve as a model: all the known functional definitions are definitions in terms of a causal role for the motion of physical objects and hence presuppose spatiotemporal relations.

View PDFchevron_right
The emergence of spacetime in quantum theories of gravity
Christian Wuthrich

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 2013

View PDFchevron_right
The emergence of spacetime in quantum theories of gravity - eScholarship
Christian Wuthrich

2013

View PDFchevron_right
A Specimen of Theory Construction from Quantum Gravity
Rafael Sorkin

The Creation of Ideas in Physics, 1995

I describe the history of my attempts to arrive at a discrete substratum underlying the spacetime manifold, culminating in the hypothesis that the basic structure has the form of a partial-order (i.e. that it is a causal set). Like the other speakers in this session, I too am here much more as a working scientist than as a philosopher. Of course it is good to remember Peter Bergmann's description of the physicist as "in many respects a philosopher in workingman's* clothes", but today I'm not going to change into a white shirt and attempt to draw philosophical lessons from the course of past work on quantum gravity. Instead I will merely try to recount a certain part of my own experience with this problem, explaining how I arrived at the idea of what I will call a causal set. This and similar structures have been proposed more than once as discrete replacements for spacetime. My excuse for not telling you also how others arrived at essentially the same idea [1] is naturally that my case is the only one I can hope to reconstruct with even minimal accuracy.

View PDFchevron_right
Spacetime and the Philosophical Challenge of Quantum Gravity
Jeremy Butterfield

1999

We survey some philosophical aspects of the search for a quantum theory of gravity, emphasising how quantum gravity throws into doubt the treatment of spacetime common to the two `ingredient theories' (quantum theory and general relativity), as a 4-dimensional manifold equipped with a Lorentzian metric. After an introduction, we briefly review the conceptual problems of the ingredient theories and introduce the enterprise of quantum gravity We then describe how three main research programmes in quantum gravity treat four topics of particular importance: the scope of standard quantum theory; the nature of spacetime; spacetime diffeomorphisms, and the so-called problem of time. By and large, these programmes accept most of the ingredient theories' treatment of spacetime, albeit with a metric with some type of quantum nature; but they also suggest that the treatment has fundamental limitations. This prompts the idea of going further: either by quantizing structures other than t...

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Philosophy
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved