Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Feedback in Nordic First-Encounters: a Comparative Study

Abstract

The paper compares how feedback is expressed via speech and head movements in comparable corpora of first encounters in three Nordic languages: Danish, Finnish and Swedish. The three corpora have been collected following common guidelines, and they have been annotated according to the same scheme in the NOMCO project. The results of the comparison show that in this data the most frequent feedback-related head movement is Nod in all three languages. Two types of Nods were distinguished in all corpora: ...

References (17)

  1. References
  2. Allwood, J., Cerrato, L., Jokinen, K., Navarretta, C. and Paggio, P. (2007) The MUMIN Coding Scheme for the Annotation of Feedback, Turn Management and Sequencing. In Martin et al. (eds) Multimodal Corpora for Modelling Human Multimodal Behaviour. Argyle, M. (1975) Bodily Communication. Methuen&Co. Ltd. London.
  3. Boholm, M. and Allwood, J. (2010). Repeated head movements, their function and relation to speech. In Kipp et al. (eds.) Workshop on Multimodal Corpora: Advances in Capturing, Coding and Analyzing Multimodality. LREC 2010.
  4. Allwood, J. and J. Lu (2010). Chinese and Swedish multimodal communicative feedback. Presented at the 5th International Conference on Multimodality, Sydney.
  5. Boersma, Paul and David Weenink (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.05). Retrieved May 1, 2009, from http://www.praat.org/.
  6. Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 23, Issue 2, 283-292.
  7. Jokinen, K. (2011). Turn taking, Utterance Density, and Gaze Patterns as Cues to Conversational Activity. In Proceedings of the ICMI-MMC Workshop, November, Spain.
  8. Jongejan, B. (2012). Automatic annotation of head velocity and acceleration in Anvil. Proceedings of LREC 2012.
  9. Kipp, M. (2004) Gesture Generation by Imitation -From Human Behavior to Computer Character Animation. Ph.D. thesis, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany, Boca Raton, Florida, dissertation.com.
  10. Maynard, Senko K. (1987). Interactional functions of a nonverbal sign Head movement in Japanese dyadic casual conversation, Journal of Pragmatics, 11,5. 589-606.
  11. Navarretta, C., E. Ahlsén, J. Allwood, K. Jokinen, P. Paggio (2011) Creating Comparable Multimodal Corpora for Nordic Languages. In Proceedings of the 18th Nodalida., 153-160.
  12. Nivre, Joakim (1999). Modifierad Standardortografi, Version 6 (MSO6). Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.
  13. Nivre, Joakim (2004). Göteborg Transcription Standard. (GTS) V. 6.4. Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.
  14. Paggio, P. and C. Navarretta. (2011) Head Movements, Facial Expressions and Feedback in Danish First Encounters Interactions: A Culture-Specific Analysis. In Stephanidis (Ed.) Universal Access in Human- Computer Interaction-Users Diversity, LNCS 6766, Springer Verlag, 583-590.
  15. Paggio, P., J. Allwood, E. Ahlsén, K. Jokinen, C. Navarretta (2010). The NOMCO multimodal Nordic resource -goals and characteristics. In Proceedings of LREC 2010, 2968-2973.
  16. Rehm, M., E. André, N. Bee, B. Endrass, M. Wissner, Y. Nakamo, A. Akhter Lipi, T. Nishida and H.H. Huang (2009). The Intercultural Dimension of Multimodal Corpora. In Kipp et al. (eds) Multimodal Corpora. LNAI 5509. Springer,138-159.
  17. Sorjonen, M. (2001). Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish. Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series 70. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.