Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Shoreline Definition and Detection: A Review

https://doi.org/10.2112/03-0071.1

Abstract

Analysis of shoreline variability and shoreline erosion-accretion trends is fundamental to a broad range of investigations undertaken by coastal scientists, coastal engineers, and coastal managers. Though strictly defined as the intersection of water and land surfaces, for practical purposes, the dynamic nature of this boundary and its dependence on the temporal and spatial scale at which it is being considered results in the use of a range of shoreline indicators. These proxies are generally one of two types: either a feature that is visibly discernible in coastal imagery (e.g., highwater line [HWL]) or the intersection of a tidal datum with the coastal profile (e.g., mean high water [MHW]). Recently, a third category of shoreline indicator has begun to be reported in the literature, based on the application of imageprocessing techniques to extract proxy shoreline features from digital coastal images that are not necessarily visible to the human eye.

References (94)

  1. AARNINKHOF, S.G.J., 2003. Nearshore Bathymetry Derived from Video Imagery. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Tech- nology, Doctoral thesis, 155p.
  2. AARNINKHOF, S.G.J.; CALJOUW, M., and STIVE, M.J.F., 2000. Video- based, quantitative assessment of intertidal beach variability. Pro- ceedings of the 27th International Conference on Coastal Engineer- ing (Sydney, Australia), pp. 3291-3304.
  3. ANDERS, F.J. and BYRNES, M.R., 1991. Accuracy of shoreline change rates as determined from maps and aerial photographs. Shore and Beach, 59(1), 17-26.
  4. BAILEY, B. and NOWELL, D., 1996. Techniques for monitoring coastal change: a review and case study. Ocean and Coastal Management, 32(2), 85-95.
  5. BATTIAU-QUENEY, Y.; BILLET, J.F.; CHAVEROT, S., and LANOY-RA- TEL, P., 2003. Recent shoreline mobility and geomorphic evolution of macrotidal sandy beaches in the north of France. Marine Ge- ology, 194, 31-45.
  6. BELLOMO, D.; PAJAK, M.J., and SPARKS, M.J., 1999. Coastal flood hazards and the National Flood Insurance Program. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 21-26.
  7. BROWN, D.G. and ARBOGAST, A.F., 1999. Digital photogrammetric change analysis as applied to active coastal dunes in Michigan. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65(4), 467- 474.
  8. BYRNES, M.R.; MCBRIDE, R.A., and HILAND, M.W., 1991. Accuracy standards and development of a national shoreline change data- base. Proceedings of the Coastal Sediments '91 (Seattle, Washing- ton), pp. 1027-1042.
  9. CALJOUW, M., 2000. Video-based monitoring of the Egmond beach and shoreface nourishments. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft Uni- versity of Technology, Master's thesis.
  10. CARR, A.P., 1962. Cartographic record and historical accuracy. Ge- ography, 47, 135-144.
  11. CARR, A.P., 1980. The significance of cartographic sources in deter- mining coastal change. In: CULLINGFORD, R.A.; DAVIDSON, D.A., and LEWIN, J. (eds.), Timescales in Geomorphology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 69-78.
  12. COASTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER, 1984. Shore Protection Manual, Volumes 1 and 2. Washington, DC: US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Coastal Engineering Research Center.
  13. COYNE, M.A.; FLETCHER, C.H., and RICHMOND, B.M., 1999. Map- ping coastal erosion hazard areas in Hawaii. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 171-184.
  14. CRACKNELL, A.P., 1999. Remote sensing techniques in estuaries and coastal zones-an update. International Journal of Remote Sens- ing, 19(3), 485-496.
  15. CROWELL, M.; DOUGLAS, B.C., and LEATHERMAN, S.P., 1997. On forecasting future U.S. shoreline positions: a test of algorithms. Journal of Coastal Research, 13(4), 1245-1255.
  16. CROWELL, M.; HONEYCUTT, M.G., and HATHEWAY, D., 1999. Coastal erosion hazards study: phase one mapping. Journal of Coastal Re- search, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 10-20.
  17. CROWELL, M.; LEATHERMAN, S.P., and BUCKLEY, M.K., 1991. His- torical shoreline change: error analysis and mapping accuracy. Journal of Coastal Research, 7(3), 839-852.
  18. CROWELL, M.; LEATHERMAN, S.P., and BUCKLEY, M.K., 1993. Shore- line change rate analysis: long term versus short term. Shore and Beach, 61(2), 13-20.
  19. DEMIRPOLAT, S. and TANNER, W.F., 1991. Keys to high-accuracy mapping of shoreline changes. Proceedings of the Coastal Sedi- ments '91 (Seattle, Washington), pp. 1054-1068.
  20. DOLAN, R.; FENSTER, M.S., and HOLME, S.J., 1991. Temporal anal- ysis of shoreline recession and accretion. Journal of Coastal Re- search, 7(3), 723-744.
  21. Journal of Coastal Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2005
  22. DOLAN, R.; HAYDEN, B.P., and HEYWOOD, J., 1978. A new photo- grammetric method for determining shoreline erosion. Coastal En- gineering, 2(1), 21-39.
  23. DOLAN, R.; HAYDEN, B.P.; MAY, P., and MAY, S.K., 1980. The reli- ability of shoreline change measurements from aerial photo- graphs. Shore and Beach, 48(4), 22-29.
  24. DOLAN, R.; HAYDEN, B.P., and MAY, S., 1983. Erosion of the US shorelines. In: Komar, P.D. (ed.), CRC Handbook of Coastal Pro- cesses and Erosion. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, pp. 285-299.
  25. DOLAN, R.; HAYDEN, B.P.; REA, C., and HEYWOOD, J., 1979. Shore- line erosion rates along the middle Atlantic coast of the United States. Geology, 7, 602-606.
  26. DOUGLAS, B.C. and CROWELL, M., 2000. Long-term shoreline posi- tion prediction and error propagation. Journal of Coastal Research, 16(1), 145-152.
  27. DOUGLAS, B.C.; CROWELL, M., and HONEYCUTT, M.G., 2002. [Dis- cussion of FENSTER, M.S.; DOLAN, R., and MORTON, R.A., 2001.] Coastal storms and shoreline change: Signal or noise? Journal of Coastal Research, 17(3), 714-720.] Journal of Coastal Research, 18(2), 388-390.
  28. DOUGLAS, B.C.; CROWELL, M., and LEATHERMAN, S.P., 1998. Con- siderations for shoreline position prediction. Journal of Coastal Re- search, 14(3), 1025-1033.
  29. DOUGLASS, S.L.; SANCHEZ, T.A., and JENKINS, S., 1999. Mapping erosion hazard areas in Baldwin County, Alabama and the use of confidence intervals in shoreline change analysis. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 95-105.
  30. DRONKERS, T., 2001. Intertidal Morphodynamics at Narrowneck Reef. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, Mas- ter's thesis, 51p.
  31. ELIOT, I. and CLARKE, D., 1989. Temporal and spatial bias in the estimation of shoreline rate-of-change statistics from beach survey information. Coastal Management, 17, 129-156.
  32. EVERTS, C.H. and GIBSON, P.N., 1983. Shoreline change analysis- one tool for improving coastal zone decisions. Proceedings of the Sixth Australian Conference on Coastal and Ocean Engineering (Gold Coast, Australia), pp. 122-131.
  33. FARRELL, S.; LEPP, T.; SPEER, B., and MAURIELLO, M., 1999. Map- ping erosion hazard areas in Ocean County. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 50-57.
  34. FENSTER, M.S. and DOLAN, R., 1999. Mapping erosion hazard areas in the City of Virginia Beach. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 56-68.
  35. FENSTER, M.S.; DOLAN, R., and MORTON, R.A., 2001. Coastal storms and shoreline change: signal or noise? Journal of Coastal Research, 17(3), 714-720.
  36. FISHER, J.S. and OVERTON, M.F., 1994. Interpretation of shoreline position from aerial photographs. Proceedings of the 24th Inter- national Conference on Coastal Engineering (Kobe, Japan), pp. 1998-2003.
  37. GALGANO, F.A. and LEATHERMAN, S.P., 1991. Shoreline change analysis: a case study. Proceedings of the Coastal Sediments '91 (Seattle, Washington), pp. 1043-1053.
  38. GOLDSMITH, V. and OERTEL, G., 1978. Beach profiling. In: Tanner, W.F. (ed.), Standards for Measuring Shoreline Changes: Proceed- ings of a Workshop. Tallahassee, Florida: Geology Department, Florida State University, pp. 37-41.
  39. GORMAN, L.; MORANG, A., and LARSON, R., 1998. Monitoring the coastal environment. Part IV. Mapping, shoreline changes, and bathymetric analysis. Journal of Coastal Research, 14(1), 61-92.
  40. GUY, D.E., 1999. Erosion hazard area mapping, Lake County, Ohio. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 185-196.
  41. HANSON, H.; GRAVENS, M.B., and KRAUS, N.C., 1988. Prototype ap- plications of a generalized shoreline change numerical model. Pro- ceedings of the 21st International Conference on Coastal Engineer- ing (Costa del Sol-Malaga, Spain), pp. 1265-1279.
  42. HAPKE, C. and RICHMOND, B.M., 2000. Monitoring beach morphol- ogy changes using small-format aerial photography and digital softcopy photogrammetry. Environmental Geosciences, 7(1), 32-37.
  43. HAYDEN, B.P.; DOLAN, R., and FELDER, W., 1979. Spatial and tem- poral analyses of shoreline variations. Coastal Engineering, 2, 351-361.
  44. HESS, K.W., 2003. Tidal datums and tide coordination. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue NO. 38, pp. 38-43.
  45. HOEKE, R.K.; ZARILLO, G.A., and SYNDER, M., 2001. A GIS Based Tool for Extracting Shoreline Positions from Aerial Imagery (BEACHTOOLS) (Coastal Engineering Technical Note IV). Wash- ington, DC: US Army Corps of Engineers, 12p.
  46. HOLLAND, K.T.; HOLMAN, R.A.; LIPPMANN, T.C.; STANLEY, J., and PLANT, N.G., 1997. Practical use of video imagery in nearshore oceanographic field studies. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 22(1), 81-92.
  47. HOLMAN, R.A.; SALLENGER, A.H.; LIPPMANN, T.C., and HAINES, J.W., 1993. The application of video image processing to the study of nearshore processes. Oceanography, 6(3), 78-85.
  48. HONEYCUTT, M.G.; CROWELL, M., and DOUGLAS, B.C., 2001. Shore- line-position forecasting: impact of storms, rate-calculation meth- odologies, and temporal scales. Journal of Coastal Research, 17(3), 721-730.
  49. JIMENEZ, J.A.; SANCHEZ-ARCILLA, A.; BOU, J., and ORTIZ, M.A., 1997. Analysing short-term shoreline changes along the Ebro Del- ta (Spain) using aerial photographs. Journal of Coastal Research, 13(4), 1256-1266.
  50. KAMINSKY, G.M.; DANIELS, R.C.; HUXFORD, R.; MCCANDLESS, D., and RUGGIERO, P., 1999. Mapping erosion hazard areas in Pacific County, Washington. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 158-170.
  51. KINGSTON, K.S.; RUESSINK, B.G.; VAN ENCKEVORT, I.M.J., and DA- VIDSON, M.A., 2000. Artificial neural network correction of re- motely sensed sandbar location. Marine Geology, 169, 137-160.
  52. KOMAR, P.D., 1998. Beach Processes and Sedimentation. Upper Sad- dle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., 544p.
  53. KOMAR, P.D.; DIAZ-MENDEZ, G.M., and MARRA, J.J., 2001. Stability of the New River Spit, and the position of Oregon's beach-zone line. Journal of Coastal Research, 17(3), 625-635.
  54. KRAUS, N.C. and ROSATI, J.D., 1997. Interpretation of shoreline- position data for coastal engineering analysis. Coastal Engineering Technical Note (CETN II-39). Vicksburg, Mississippi: US Army Waterways Experiment Station.
  55. LEATHERMAN, S.P., 1983. Historical and projected shoreline map- ping. Proceedings of the Coastal Zone '83 (San Diego, California), pp. 2902-2910.
  56. LEATHERMAN, S.P., 2001. Social and economic costs of sea level rise. In: DOUGLAS, B.C.; KEARNEY, M.S., and LEATHERMAN, S.P. (eds.), Sea Level Rise History and Consequences. San Diego, California: Academic Press, p. 232.
  57. LEATHERMAN, S.P. and ANDERS, F.J., 1999. Mapping and managing coastal erosion hazards in New York. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 34-42.
  58. LEATHERMAN, S.P. and ESKANDARY, L.S., 1999. Evaluation of coast- al erosion hazards along Delaware's Atlantic Coast. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 43-49.
  59. LIPPMANN, T.C. and HOLMAN, R.A., 1989. Quantification of sand bar morphology: a video technique based on wave dissipation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 94(C1), 995-1011.
  60. LIST, J.H. and FARRIS, A.S., 1999. Large-scale shoreline response to storms and fair weather. Proceedings of the Coastal Sediments '99 (Long Island, New York), pp. 1324-1337.
  61. MCBETH, F.H., 1956. A method of shoreline delineation. Photogram- metric Engineering, 22(2), 400-405.
  62. MCBRIDE, R.A.; HILAND, M.W.; PENLAND, S.; WILLIAMS, S.J.; BYRNES, M.R.; WESTPHAL, K.A.; JAFFE, B.E., and SALLENGER, A.H., 1991. Mapping barrier island changes in Louisiana: tech- niques, accuracy, and results. Proceedings of the Coastal Sedi- ments '91 (Seattle, Washington), pp. 1011-1026.
  63. MCCURDY, P.G., 1950. Coastal delineation from aerial photographs. Photogrammetric Engineering, 16(4), 550-555.
  64. MOORE, L.J., 2000. Shoreline mapping techniques. Journal of Coast- al Research, 16(1), 111-124.
  65. MOORE, L.J.; BENUMOF, B.T., and GRIGGS, G.B., 1999. Coastal ero- sion hazards in Santa Cruz and San Diego. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 121-139.
  66. MORTON, R.A., 1991. Accurate shoreline mapping: past, present, and Shoreline Definition and Detection Journal of Coastal Research, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2005 future. Proceedings of the Coastal Sediments '91 (Seattle, Wash- ington), pp. 997-1010.
  67. MORTON, R.A.; LEACH, M.P.; PAINE, J.G., and CARDOZA, M.A., 1993. Monitoring beach changes using GPS surveying techniques. Jour- nal of Coastal Research, 9(3), 702-720.
  68. MORTON, R.A. and MCKENNA, K.K., 1999. Analysis and projection of erosion hazard areas in Brazoria and Galveston Counties, Tex- as. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 106-120.
  69. MORTON, R.A. and SPEED, F.M., 1998. Evaluation of shorelines and legal boundaries controlled by water levels on sandy beaches. Journal of Coastal Research, 14(4), 1373-1384.
  70. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, 1990. Managing Coastal Erosion. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 182p.
  71. NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT, 1991. Resource Management Act. Wel- lington, New Zealand: New Zealand Government, 382p.
  72. NORCROSS, Z.M.; FLETCHER, C.H., and MERRIFIELD, M., 2002. An- nual and interannual changes on a reef-fringed pocket beach: Kai- lua Bay, Hawaii. Marine Geology, 190(3-4), 553-580.
  73. O'CONNELL, J.F. and LEATHERMAN, S.P., 1999. Coastal erosion haz- ards and mapping along the Massachusetts Shore. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 27-33.
  74. OVERTON, M.F. and FISHER, J.S., 1996. Shoreline analysis using dig- ital photogrammetry. Proceedings of the 25th International Con- ference on Coastal Engineering (Orlando, Florida), pp. 3750-3761.
  75. OVERTON, M.F.; GRENIER, R.R.; JUDGE, E.K., and FISHER, J.S., 1999. Identification and analysis of coastal erosion hazard areas: Dare and Brunswick Counties, North Carolina. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 28, pp. 69-84.
  76. PAJAK, M.J. and LEATHERMAN, S.P., 2002. The high water line as shoreline indicator. Journal of Coastal Research, 18(2), 329-337.
  77. PARKER, B., 2001. Where is the shoreline? The answer is not as simple as one might expect. Hydro International, 5(5), 6-9.
  78. PLANT. N.G.; AARNINKHOF, S.C.J., TURNER, I.L., and Kingston, K.S., in press. The performance of shoreline detection models ap- plied to video imagery. Journal of Coastal Research, in press.
  79. PLANT, N.G. and HOLMAN, R.A., 1996. Interannual shoreline vari- ations at Duck, North Carolina, USA. Proceedings of the 25th In- ternational Conference on Coastal Engineering (Orlando, Florida), pp. 3521-3533.
  80. PLANT, N.G. and HOLMAN, R.A., 1997. Intertidal beach profile es- timation using video images. Marine Geology, 140, 1-24.
  81. PRIEST, G.R., 1999. Coastal shoreline change study: northern and central Lincoln County, Oregon. Journal of Coastal Research, Spe- cial Issue No. 28, pp. 140-157.
  82. RICHARDS, J.A. and JIA, X., 1999. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. New York: Springer, 363p.
  83. SHALOWITZ, A.L., 1964. Shore and Sea Boundaries with Special Ref- erence to the Interpretation and Use of Coast and Geodetic Survey Data (Publication 10-1). Washington, DC: US Government Print- ing Office, US Department of Commerce, Coast and Geodetic Sur- vey, 484p.
  84. SHOSHANY, M. and DEGANI, A., 1992. Shoreline detection by digital image processing of aerial photography. Journal of Coastal Re- search, 8(1), 29-34.
  85. SMITH, A.W.S. and JACKSON, L.A., 1992. The variability in width of the visible beach. Shore and Beach, 60(2), 7-14.
  86. SMITH, G.L. and ZARILLO, G.A., 1990. Calculating long-term shore- line recession rates using aerial photographic and beach profiling techniques. Journal of Coastal Research, 6(1), 111-120.
  87. STAFFORD, D.B. and LANGFELDER, J., 1971. Air photo survey of coastal erosion. Photogrammetric Engineering, 37(6), 565-575.
  88. STOCKDON, H.F.; SALLENGER, A.H.; LIST, J.H., and HOLMAN, R.A., 2002. Estimation of shoreline position and change using airborne topographic lidar data. Journal of Coastal Research, 18(3), 502- 513.
  89. THIELER, E.R. and DANFORTH, W.W., 1994. Historical shoreline mapping (I): improving techniques and reducing positioning er- rors. Journal of Coastal Research, 10(3), 549-563.
  90. TOU, J.T. and GONZALEZ, R.C., 1974. Pattern Recognition Principles. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 377p.
  91. TURNER, I.L. and LEYDEN, V.M., 2000. System Description and Anal- ysis of Shoreline Change: August 1999-February 2000. Report 1. Northern Gold Coast Coastal Imaging System (Technical Report 00/12). Sydney, Australia: Water Research Laboratory, University of New South Wales.
  92. TURNER, I.L.; LEYDEN, V.M.; SYMONDS, G.; MCGRATH, J.; JACKSON, A.; JANCAR, T.; AARNINKHOF, S.G.J., and ELSHOFF, I., 2000. Pre- dicted and observed coastline changes at the Gold Coast artificial reef. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Coastal Engineering (Sydney, Australia), pp. 1836-1847.
  93. ZHANG, K.; DOUGLAS, B.C., and LEATHERMAN, S.P., 2002. Do storms cause long-term beach erosion along the U.S. East Barrier Coast? Journal of Geology, 110, 493-502.
  94. ZHANG, K.; HUANG, W.; DOUGLAS, B.C., and LEATHERMAN, S.P., 2002. Shoreline position variability and long-term trend analysis. Shore and Beach, 70(2), 31-35.