Dealing realistically with the artificial intelligence revolution
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2019.1604812…
3 pages
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
AI
AI
The competition for leadership in artificial intelligence (AI) is multifaceted and global, with ethical considerations that challenge both military and civilian applications. Unlike the secretive nuclear arms race of the Cold War, AI research is broadly collaborative, shared among both public and private sectors worldwide. Managing the rapid advancements in AI technology, while mitigating potential dangers—such as autonomous weaponry—presents an unprecedented challenge, requiring careful stewardship to harness beneficial applications and safeguard against negative outcomes.
Related papers
Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society - AIES '18, 2018
The rhetoric of the race for strategic advantage is increasingly being used with regard to the development of artificial intelligence (AI), sometimes in a military context, but also more broadly. This rhetoric also reflects real shifts in strategy, as industry research groups compete for a limited pool of talented researchers, and nation states such as China announce ambitious goals for global leadership in AI. This paper assesses the potential risks of the AI race narrative and of an actual competitive race to develop AI, such as incentivising corner-cutting on safety and governance, or increasing the risk of conflict. It explores the role of the research community in responding to these risks. And it briefly explores alternative ways in which the rush to develop powerful AI could be framed so as instead to foster collaboration and responsible progress.
Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 2021
The Pioneer, 2023
AI is one of the biggest technical advancements in recent times. but it can pose a great danger to humanity by unleashing misinformation and deepfakes. Regulating it therefore is of utmost importance. The recently concluded conference on 1-2 November 2023 in UK raised some hope in this regard.
2025
This paper explores the ethical, strategic, and regulatory dimensions of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into military operations. As AI technologies revolutionize modern warfare—offering capabilities such as autonomous decision-making and real-time battlefield analysis—they also raise complex ethical questions related to accountability, transparency, and human oversight. The dual-use nature of AI heightens concerns over global proliferation and arms race dynamics, underscoring the need for robust international cooperation. Drawing on global policy dialogues and existing ethical frameworks, the paper advocates for a human-centric approach to AI design, continuous oversight, and the establishment of common international standards. It calls for transparent governance, inclusive public discourse, and the creation of independent oversight bodies to ensure AI enhances global security without compromising humanitarian values. Ultimately, it underscores the moral imperative for a unified global effort to guide the responsible integration of AI in military strategy.
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness, 2022
Philosophy and AI have had a difficult relationship from the beginning. The “classic” period from 1950 to 2000 saw four major conflicts, first about the logical coherence of AI as an endeavor, and then about architecture, semantics, and the Frame Problem. Since 2000, these early debates have been largely replaced by arguments about consciousness and ethics, arguments that now involve neuroscientists, lawyers, and economists as well as AI scientists and philosophers. We trace these developments, and speculate about the future.
Global Policy
Autonomous weapons technologies, which rely on artificial intelligence, are advancing rapidly and without sufficient public debate or accountability. Oversight of increased autonomy in warfare is critically important because this deadly technology is likely to proliferate rapidly, enhance terrorist tactics, empower authoritarian rulers, undermine democratic peace, and is vulnerable to bias, hacking, and malfunction. The top competitors in this arms race are the United States, China, Russia, South Korea, and the European Union. Spending soars as progress stalls: where is the public debate on lethal artificial intelligence and autonomous weapons systems development?
UK Project on Nuclear Issues; The Royal United Services Institute, 2020
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to affect ever more aspects of military and civilian life as part of the fourth industrial revolution. Countries are racing for global AI dominance, and whoever ‘wins’ shall reap the economic and geopolitical power expected to result. However, AI-enhanced technologies could pose new security risks that have not been encountered before. This paper discusses some military and defence implications of AI development and assesses potential threats to Euro-Atlantic security. China has been identified as potentially threatening because of its high AI capability rankings, use of AI for military applications and poise to become the global 5G leader. Ultimately, this paper argues that the UK and the EU should approach outsourcing critical communications infrastructure with caution and take recent security concerns involving China more seriously. https://rusi.org/sites/default/files/202011_poni_papers_2020_web.pdf
2015
The rapid advancement of Artificial intelligence (AI) and Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has poses a fear in the minds of its experts. AI is named among the top global risk that threatens human civilization in many ways. This research work is restricted to explore and argue based on commonsense on economic challenges posted by Robots/expert systems and other intelligent machines in industries and slightly argue on “Technological Singularity” or “Intelligence explosion” we have recommend that there is a compelling necessity to evaluate and control the development of intelligent machines by international security agencies such as FBI and CIA in collaboration with IEEE and other professional bodies. We conclude that AGI and AI systems along has no power eliminate human race in whatever situation.
Artificial Intelligence Review, 1991

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.