Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

The Iterative Design of a Virtual Design Studio

2008, TechTrends

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This paper discusses the iterative design process of the Design eXchange, a virtual studio developed to enhance collaborative design culture, particularly in human-computer interaction. The project evolved from a focus on sharing work to creating a multifaceted platform that facilitates various design activities and communities. Through this reflection, the authors highlight the importance of employing wiki technology, drawing parallels with early design theories and emphasizing its adaptability for fostering design knowledge and collaboration.

References (25)

  1. Alexander, C. (2002). The nature of order: Vol.
  2. Berkeley, CA: The Center for Environ- mental Structure.
  3. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, build- ings, construction. New York: Oxford Uni- versity Press.
  4. Atwood, M. E., McCain, K. W., & Williams, J. C. (2002). How does the design community think about design? Designing Interactive Systems DIS2002. London, UK.
  5. Biddle, R., Noble, J., & Tempero, E. (2002). Reflections on CRC cards and OO design. Proceedings of the Fortieth International Conference on Tools Pacific: Objects for In- ternet, Mobile and Embedded Applications. Sydney, Australia.
  6. Blevis, E., Lim, Y. K., & Ozakca, M. (2005). The design exchange: A collaborative online community for designers based on shared construction of design knowledge. 11th International Conference on Human-Com- puter Interaction: Online Communities and Social Computing. Las Vegas, NV.
  7. Blevis, E., Lim, Y. K., Ozakca, M., & Aneja, S. (2005, April 2-7). Designing interactivity for the specific context of designerly col- laborations. ACM CHI 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Port- land, OR.
  8. Blevis, E., & Siegel M. (2005). The explanation for design explanations. 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interac- tion: Interaction Design Education and Re- search: Current and Future Trends. Las Ve- gas, NV.
  9. Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. De- sign Issues 17(3), 49-55.
  10. Cunningham, W., & Leuf, B. (2001). The wiki way: Quick collaboration on the web. Addi- son-Wesley.
  11. Fallman, D. (2003, April 5-10). Design-ori- ented human-computer interaction. In G. Cockton & P. Korhonen (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2003 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, Ft. Lauder- dale, FL, 225-232.
  12. Lim, Y. (2004). Multiple aspect based task analysis (MABTA) for user requirements gathering in highly-contextualized interac- tive system design. Proceedings of Tamodia 2004, ACM Press, Prague, Czech Republic.
  13. Lim, Y., Rogers, Y., & Mehta, K. (2005, Octo- ber 27-28). Designing an environment for co-located collaborative analysis of user experience. Proceedings of Workshop of In- Use, In-Situ: Extending Field Research Meth- ods (BCS-HCI), London, UK.
  14. Lim, Y., & Sato, K. (2001, October). Develop- ment of design information framework for interactive systems design. Proceedings of the 5th Asian Design Conference, Interna- tional Symposium on Design Science. Seoul, South Korea.
  15. Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thought- ful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. MIT Press.
  16. Margolin, V. (2002). The politics of the artifi- cial. University of Chicago Press: London.
  17. Moran, T. P., & Carroll, J. M. (Eds.). (1996). Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum As- sociates.
  18. Muller, M. J. (2001). Layered participatory analysis: New developments in the CARD technique. ACM CHI 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Se- attle, WA.
  19. Nelson, H., & Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way -Intentional change in an unpredictable world. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications..
  20. Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things (2nd ed.). New York: Doubleday.
  21. Owen, C. L. (2001). Structured planning. Chi- cago: The Institute of Design, IIT. Retrieved April 1, 2006, from http://www.id.iit.edu/ papers/Owen_theoryjust.pdf
  22. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
  23. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artifi- cial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press..
  24. Wikipedia. Ward Cunningham. Retrieved April 1, 2006, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Ward_Cunningham
  25. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understand- ing computers and cognition: A new foun- dation for design. New York: Addison-Wes- ley, Inc.