Critical Factors for Knowledge Management in Project Business
Abstract
Project-based business is significantly growing in different sectors due to multiple advantages projects can offer. However, one major concerns of projects is being a temporary business with high possibilities of losing organizational knowledge, and greater difficulties in assuring teams' commitment, causing slowness in organizational learnability and capability to evolve and become more competitive. Therefore, many project-based organizations consider knowledge management initiatives to fill that gap. Nevertheless, many of such initiatives fail to deliver the expected results due to different failure factors and barriers, while others could be more successful due to a group of success factors and enablers. This article discusses a conceptual model consisted of six success factors that contribute to the overall success of KM initiatives in project-based organizations.
References (16)
- Ajmal, M., Helo, P. and Kekäle, T. 2010. Critical factors for knowledge management in project business. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14 (1), pp. 156-168.
- Amabile, T.M. (1997), ''Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do'', California Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 39-58.
- Chua, A. and Lam, W. (2005), ''Why KM projects fail: a multi-case analysis'', Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.
- Davenport, T.H., De Long, D.W. and Beers, M.C. (1998), ''Successful knowledge management projects'', Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 43-57.
- Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture's Consequences, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
- Ithia, A. (2003), ''UK lawyers spend more on KM'', KM Review, Vol. 5 No. 6, p. 11.
- Long, D.D. (1997), ''Building the knowledge-based organizations: how culture drives knowledge behaviors'', working paper, Center for Business Innovation, Ernst & Young LLP, Cambridge, MA.
- Massey, A.P., Montoya-Weiss, M.M. and O'Driscoll, T.M. (2002), ''Knowledge management in pursuit of performance: insights from Nortel networks'', MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 269-89.
- Moffett, S., McAdam, R. and Parkinson, S. (2003), ''An empirical analysis of knowledge management applications'', Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 6-26.
- Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
- Osterloh, M. and Frey, B.S. (2000), ''Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational form'', Organization Science, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 538-50.
- Pieris, C., David, L. and William, M. (2003), ''Excellence in knowledge management: an empirical study to identify critical factors and performance measures'', Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 29-45.
- Porter, T. and Lilly, B. 1996. The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7 (4), pp. 361--
- Prencipe, A. and Tell, F. (2001), ''Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms'', Research Policy, Vol. 30 No. 9, pp. 1373-94.
- Ruppel, C.P. and Harrington, S.J. (2001), ''Sharing knowledge through intranets: a study of organizational culture and intranet implementation'', IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 37-52.
- Wiig, K.M. (1997), ''Knowledge management: an introduction and perspective'', Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 6-14.