Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Internet skills and the digital divide

https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810386774

Abstract

Because of the growing amount of information on the internet and people’s increasing dependence on information, internet skills should be considered as a vital resource in contemporary society. This article focuses on the differential possession of internet skills among the Dutch population. In two studies, an in-depth range of internet skills are measured by charging subjects assignments to be accomplished on the internet. Subjects were recruited by applying a random stratified sampling method over gender, age, and education. While the level of operational and formal internet skills appeared quite high, the level of information and strategic internet skills is questionable. Whereas education appeared an important contributor to all skill levels, age only appeared a significant contributor to operational and formal skills. The results strengthen the findings that the original digital divide of physical internet access has evolved into a divide that includes differences in skills to use the internet.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What explains the widening gap in internet skills among social segments?add

The research indicates that while physical access to the internet is improving, skills inequalities persist, particularly in strategic and information-related skills. Specifically, educational attainment was found to be crucial across all types of internet skills, indicating that socio-economic factors contribute to this widening gap.

How did educational levels impact internet skills across the Dutch population?add

The study discovered that higher educational attainment was associated with better performance in all types of internet skills, notably operational and formal skills. In contrast, lower educational groups demonstrated significant deficiencies, particularly in strategic and information skills.

What proficiency levels were identified in the different types of internet skills?add

The findings revealed that participants averaged only 0.5 successful completions of strategic skill tasks, indicating significant room for improvement. In comparative terms, operational skills were generally higher, with an average completion rate of around 73%.

How did age influence the level of internet skills in users?add

Age emerged as a primary factor, with older subjects performing worse, particularly in operational and formal internet tasks. The younger generation exhibited better performance, suggesting a digital divide that correlates strongly with age demographics.

What role does internet experience play in developing necessary internet skills?add

While years of internet experience contributed to operational skills, it surprisingly did not enhance formal, information, or strategic internet skills. This finding suggests the need for additional learning contexts beyond mere experience to improve these more complex skill sets.

References (38)

  1. Ahuja JS and Webster J (2001) Perceived disorientation: An examination of a new measure to assess web design effectiveness. Interacting with Computers 14(1): 15-29.
  2. Anandarajan M, Simmers C and Igbaria M (2000) An exploratory investigation of the antecedents and impact of internet usage: An individual perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology 19(1): 69-85.
  3. Aula A and Nordhausen K (2006) Modeling successful performance in Web searching Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(12): 1678-1693.
  4. Buente W and Robbin A (2008) Trends in internet information behavior 2000-2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(1): 1743-1760.
  5. Cahoon B (1998) Teaching and learning internet skills. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 78: 5-13.
  6. Davis PM (2003) Effects of the web on undergraduate citation behavior: Guiding student scholar- ship in a networked age. Libraries and the Academy 3(1): 41-51.
  7. De Haan J and Huysmans F (2002) Differences in time between internet users and nonusers in the Netherlands. IT&Society 1(2): 67-85.
  8. De Haan J, Huysmans F and Steyaert J (2002) At Home in a Digital World: Acquiring Digital Skills between Home and School. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Agency.
  9. DiMaggio P and E Hargittai (2001) From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases. Working Paper Series 15, Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies.
  10. Ford N and Chen SY (2000) Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 9: 281-312.
  11. Goldin C and Katz LF (2008) The Race between Education and Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  12. Goulding A and Spacey R (2002) Women and the Information Society: Barriers and Participation. Paper presented at 68th IFLA Council and general conference, Glasgow, 18-24 August.
  13. Hargittai E (2002) Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday 7(4).
  14. Hargittai E (2005) Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review 23(3): 371-379.
  15. Hargittai E and Shafer S (2006) Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gen- der. Social Science Quarterly 87(2): 432-448.
  16. Merritt K, Smith D and Renzo JCD (2005) An investigation of self-reported computer literacy: Is it reliable? Issues in Information Systems 6(1): 289-295.
  17. Morahan-Martin JM (2004) How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: A cross-cultural review. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7(5): 497-510.
  18. Mossberger K, Tolbert CJ and Stansbury M (2003) Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  19. Pan B, Hembrooke H, Joachims T, Lorigo L, Gay G and Granka L (2007) In Google we trust: Users' decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 12: 801-823.
  20. Pieterson W and Ebbers W (2008) The use of service channels by citizens in the Netherlands: Implications for multi-channel management. International Review of Administrative Sciences 74(1): 95-110.
  21. Robinson JP, DiMaggio P and Hargittai E (2003) New social survey perspectives on the digital divide. IT&Society 1(5): 1-22.
  22. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
  23. Schumacher P and Morahan-Martin J (2001) Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experi- ences. Computers in Human Behavior 17: 95-110.
  24. Spink A, Wolfram D, Jansen BJ and Saracevic T (2001) Searching the web: The public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 53(2): 226-234.
  25. Steyaert J (2002) Inequality and the digital divide: Myths and realities. In: Hick S and McNutt J (eds) Advocacy, Activism and the internet. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Press, 199-211.
  26. Talja S (2005) The social and discursive construction of computing skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(1): 13-22.
  27. Van Deursen AJAM and van Dijk JAGM (2009a) Using the internet: Skill related problems in users' online behavior. Interacting with Computers. 21: 393-402.
  28. Van Deursen AJAM and van Dijk JAGM (2009b) Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly 26: 333-340.
  29. Van Deursen AJAM and van Dijk JAGM (2010) Measuring internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 26(10): 891-916.
  30. Van Dijk J (2005) The Deepening Divide Inequality in the Information Society. London: Sage Publications.
  31. Van Dijk J (2006) Digital divide: Research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics 34: 221-235.
  32. Volman M, van Eck E, van Heemskerk L and Kuiper E (2005) New technologies, new differ- ences: Gender and ethnic differences in pupils' use of ICT in primary and secondary education. Computers & Education 45(1): 35-55.
  33. Warschauer M (2002) Reconceptualising the digital divide. First Monday 7(7).
  34. Warschauer M (2003) Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  35. Wasserman IM and Richmond-Abbott M (2005) Gender and the internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly 86: 252-270.
  36. Witte J and Mannon S (2007) The Internet and Social Inequalities. New York: Routledge.
  37. Alexander J.A.M. van Deursen is a researcher at the University of Twente in the Netherlands. His dissertation, entitled 'Internet skills, vital assets in an information soci- ety' has just been released. His research focuses on digital inequality with specific atten- tion to internet skills.
  38. Jan A.G.M. van Dijk is Professor of Communication Science and the Sociology of the Information Society at the University of Twente, the Netherlands. He is chair of the Department of Media, Communication and Organization and Director of the Center for eGovernment Studies at the same university.