Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS)

https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1078834

Abstract

Although a number of instruments have been used to measure Internet skills in nationally representative surveys, there are several challenges with the measures available: incompleteness and over-simplification, conceptual ambiguity, and the use of selfreports. Here, we aim to overcome these challenges by developing a set of reliable measures for use in research, practice, and policy evaluations based on a strong conceptual framework. To achieve this goal, we carried out a literature review of skills related studies to develop the initial Internet skills framework and associated instrument. After the development of this instrument, we used a three-fold approach to test the validity and reliability of the latent skill constructs and the corresponding items. The first step consisted of cognitive interviews held in both the UK and the Netherlands. Based on the cognitive interview results, we made several amendments to the proposed skill items to improve clarity. The second step consisted of a pilot survey of digital skills, both in the UK and in the Netherlands. During the final step, we examined the consistency of the five Internet skill scales and their characteristics when measured in a representative sample survey of Dutch Internet users. The result is a theoretical, empirically and cross-nationally consistent instrument consisting of five types of Internet skills: operational, navigation information, social, creative, and mobile.

References (45)

  1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. doi:10.1037/0033- 2909.103.3.411
  2. Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies, and practices (pp. 15-32). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  3. Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 205-229. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002004
  4. Brandtweiner, R., Donat, E., & Kerschbaum, J. (2010). How to become a sophisticated User: A two- dimensional approach to e-literacy. New Media & Society, 12(5), 813-833. doi:10.1177/ 1461444809349577
  5. Bunz, U. (2004). The computer-email-web (CEW) fluency scale -Development and validation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(4), 479-506. doi:10.1207/ s15327590ijhc1704_3
  6. Bunz, U. (2009). A generational comparison of gender, computer anxiety, and computer-email-web fluency. SIMILE: Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education, 9(2), 54-69.
  7. Bunz, U., Curry, C., & Voon, W. (2007). Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2321-2344. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.008
  8. Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., & Picci, P. (2012). Are young generations in secondary school digi- tally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers & Education, 58(2), 797-807. doi:10. 1016/j.compedu.2011.10.004
  9. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Courtois, C., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). Internet skills, sources of support and benefiting from internet use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(4), 278-290.
  10. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2014). Measuring digital skills. From Digital Skills to Tangible Outcomes project report. Retrieved from www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/? id=112
  11. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2010). Measuring internet skills. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 26(10), 891-916. doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.496338
  12. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 13(6), 893-911. doi:10.1177/1461444810386774
  13. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015). Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: A longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010-2013) among the Dutch population. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 782-797. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.994544
  14. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Peters, O. (2012). Proposing a survey instrument for measuring operational, formal, information and strategic internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(12), 827-837. doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.670086
  15. van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2014). Digital skills, unlocking the information society. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved November 25, 2013, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x/full
  17. Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
  18. Eshet-Alkalai, Y. E., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 421-429. doi:10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421
  19. Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Sevilla: JRC IPTS.
  20. Fornell, C., & Larcker, F. D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable vari- ables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  21. Gaskin, J. (2011). Multigroup moderation in AMOS made easy. Retrieved July 25, 2014, from http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMYS90AU8bs
  22. Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of Internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13(6), 963-980. doi:10.1177/1461444810389751
  23. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspec- tive. Singapore: Pearson Education.
  24. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7 (4). Retrieved July 4, 2013, from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/942
  25. Hargittai, E. (2005). Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3), 371-379. doi:10.1177/0894439305275911
  26. Hargittai, E., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2012). Succinct survey measures of web-use skills. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), 95-107. doi:10.1177/0894439310397146
  27. Haythornthwaite, C. (2007). Social networks and online community. In A. Joinson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 121-137). Oxford: University Press.
  28. Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclu- sion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403-426.
  29. Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696-713. doi:10.1177/0267323113499113
  30. Helsper, E. J., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Eynon, R. (2015). Tangible outcomes of Internet use. From Digital Skills to Tangible Outcomes project report. Retrieved from www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/ projects/?id=112
  31. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robinson, A. J. (2009). Confronting the chal- lenges of participatory culture. Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  32. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  33. Krueger, B. S. (2006). A comparison of conventional and Internet political mobilization. American Politics Research, 34(6), 759-776. doi:10.1177/1532673X06290911
  34. Litt, E. (2013). Measuring users' Internet skills: A review of past assessments and a look toward the future. New Media & Society, 15(4), 612-630. doi:10.1177/1461444813475424
  35. Merritt, K., Smith, D., & Renzo, J. C. D. (2005). An investigation of self-reported computer literacy: Is it reliable. Issues in Information Systems, 6(1), 289-295.
  36. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  37. Potosky, D. (2007). The internet knowledge (iKnow) measure. Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (6), 2760-2777. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.003
  38. Segars, A. H. (1997). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega, 25(1), 107-121. doi:10.1016/S0305- 0483(96)00051-5
  39. Sonck, N., Livingstone, S., Kuiper, E., & De Haan, J. (2011). Digital literacy and safety skills. London: EU Kids Online Network. Retrieved July 4, 2013, from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/ article/viewArticle/942http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33
  40. Spitzberg, B. H. (2006). Preliminary Development of a Model and Measure of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) Competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 629-666. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00030.x
  41. Stevens, J. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  42. Steyaert, J. (2002). Inequality and the digital divide: myths and realities. In S. Hick & J. McNutt (Eds.), Advocacy, activism and the internet (pp. 199-211). Chicago, IL: Lyceum Press.
  43. Talja, S. (2005). The social and discursive construction of computing skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 13-22. doi:10.1002/asi.20091
  44. Warschauer, M. (2003). Demystifying the digital divide. Scientific American, 289(2), 42-47. doi:10. 1038/scientificamerican0803-42
  45. Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.