Street Art – questioning power and control in urban spaces
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
Folie) "The difference between sender and receiver, between producer and consumer of signs, must remain total, as within it lies the real form of social power." Beaudrillard, 1978 The title of this paper "Street Art -questioning power and control in urban spaces" evokes the question: who's the one in charge in public spaces?
Related papers
urbancreativity.org ; AP 2 - Associação para a Participação Pública, 2016
The concept of the city has come to play a central role in the practices of a new generation of artists for whom the city is their canvas. Street art is a complex social issue.
2018
What is the role of art in the reinforcement or rejection of current models of public space management in our cities? To answer this question, we must attend to the ties of all artwork with public institutions, and whether or not it questions the dominant order. In this article, I will focus on the works of the Ana Botella Crew, a group of artists from Madrid, as an example of "artivism" that challenges the City Council's management of public spaces in Madrid. My aim is to explore how useful internet tools can be to articulate artistic interventions that challenge the hegemonic uses of public space, in what Sassen has called the global city.
British Journal of Aesthetics, 2015
Street art has exploded: it pervades our back alleys, surrounds us at bus-stops, covers billboards, competes with advertising and generally serves as urban wallpaper in most cities. But what is street art? A far cry from mere graffiti, street art has gained some social acceptance, but it remains neither officially sanctioned like public art, nor institutionally condoned, like its more traditional artistic cousins in museums. Somewhere in between these two extremes, street art has emerged, occupying a metaphysically suspect grey area between illegal activity and bona fide art. This paper explores the nature of this emerging art form and draws out some of the differences between street art, public art and 'mere' graffiti. Graffiti and tagging are pervasive and ubiquitous, and just about everyone has something (usually negative) to say about them. Except philosophers of art, who have been strangely silent. Although non-philosophers have written extensively about graffiti and tagging, few aestheticians have bothered to explore their art status or aesthetic merits. 1 Recently, however, a new movement in the streets has emerged: moving beyond mere territorial markings, so-called street art is beautiful, clever and inspiring. Street art straddles two radically different kinds of mark-making practices in public spaces, falling somewhere between bona fide institutionally supported public art, on the one hand, and illegal, childish scribbles on private property, on the other. Where before the lines between public art and graffiti were clear and obvious, street art occupies a space in between, raising questions about how we distinguish amongst these three different practices. The goal of this paper is to explore the nature of this emerging art form known as 'street art', and, in doing so, draw out some of the differences between street art, public art and 'mere' graffiti. Making these distinctions will highlight two central features of street art: street art is (1) aconsensually produced (made without the consent of the property owner on whose property the work exists) in a way that (2) constitutes an act of defiant activism designed to challenge (and change) the viewer's experience of his or her environment. This paper defends these two conditions as necessary for a work to count as street art. The first section of the paper will present some paradigmatic examples of street art and distinguish them from cases of public art, on the one hand, and from graffiti and tagging, on the other. The second section considers Riggle's account of street art, and why it is problematic. The third and fourth sections defend the role of aconsensuality in street art (which distinguishes street art from public art), and explain how aconsensuality is used for a particular, defiant and activist purpose, viz., to challenge (and change) the viewer's experience of the space (which distinguishes street art from graffiti and tagging).
Journal of Urban Cultural Studies, 2020
Street art has been both a product of and a response to the unequal distribution of resources and visibility in the city. A dialectical study that investigates both sides of the coin showing art’s aesthetic, spatial, social and political situation in the changing neo-liberal urban landscape is needed. Analyzing simultaneously the hegemonic restructuring of the urban environment and the growth of counter-hegemonic resistance on the streets requires taking into account the plurality and complexity of the links between the urban environment, society and arts. This article discusses how street art, as an aesthetic dispositive, functions dialectically as both resource and resistance in the sociopolitical make-up of the urban landscape.
Public Art Dialogue, 2018
Street Art & Urban Creativity, 2018
In The Practice of Everyday Life (1980), Michel de Certeau suggests the idea of a city in which there are, on one side, strategies of information, surveillance, control and infrastructure design laid out by the system and, on the other one, tactics defining the how-to-do of the users with regards to that system, that is, the operations by which they adapt them to align their own interests and needs. The texts allows us to examine the interventions of urban artists as a tactic characterized, as defined by De Certeau, as the harnessing of the system's resources (making do). This is more specifically translated into adaptability, development on a space they do not own, identification and utilization of the occasion (time) and the inventiveness of diverting time and resources (shortcut and la perruque). In this work, we will take traffic signs of restriction and prohibition as one of the urban components that highlight the normativization of public spaces through the direct message of "NO" (not doing). Many artists have, in previous years, developed an interest in the artistic and symbolic possibilities of these signs and have developed works (tactics) as their response to them. Dan Witz (Chicago, 1957), Clet (Bretagne, 1966), Brad Dowey (Louisville, 1980) or DosJotas (Madrid, 1982) are good examples of this. Key words: De Certeau, strategies, tactics, street signs, Dan Witz, Clet, Brad Dowley, DosJotas