(Re)making sex: A praxiography of the gender clinic
2017, Feminist Theory
https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700117700051…
1 page
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
This article traces the multiple enactments of sex in clinical practices of transgender medicine to argue against the presumed singularity of 'transexuality'. Using autoethnography to analyse my own experience as a trans patient, I describe my clinical encounters with doctors, psychiatrists and surgeons in order to theorise sex as multiple. Following recent developments in science and technology studies (STS) that advance the work of Judith Butler on sex as performatively reproduced, I use a praxiographic approach to argue that treatment practices produce particular iterations of what sex (and transexuality) 'is' and how these processes limit and foreclose other trans possibilities. I consider the ethical, political and material-discursive implications of treatment practices and offer a series of reflections about the effects and effectiveness of current clinical practices and the possibilities for intervening in such processes in order that, following Annemarie Mol, we might (re)make sex (and transexuality) differently. [see jrlatham.com/publications]
Key takeaways
AI
AI
- The article critiques the singularity of 'transexuality' within transgender medical practices.
- Latham employs autoethnography to reflect on personal clinical experiences as a trans patient.
- Drawing from science and technology studies (STS), it theorizes sex as multiple and performatively reproduced.
- Treatment practices shape limited understandings of sex and transexuality, foreclosing alternative trans possibilities.
- The work suggests ethical and political interventions to (re)make sex and transexuality differently.
Related papers
Social Problems, 1982
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
Dissertation , 2019
Perversion is derived from the Latin pervertere which means “to turn around” and has been broadly conceptualized as that which deviates or wavers from an original course. One could argue that the perverse is fundamentally constructed through difference; its existence is predicated upon being set up against some norm and its eccentricity is maintained through a continued refusal to adhere to the rule. This dissertation explores questions of gender difference and sexual deviance as they relate to the clinical pathologization of transgender people’s mental health. In particular, it considers how psychoanalytic theories of perversion - in their multifaceted definitions and various clinical applications - can be usefully employed to understand transphobia as it emerges throughout psychiatric institutions. In borrowing from Freud’s polymorphous perversity, fetishism, perverse defense, and Lacan’s perverse structure, this study both contributes to and moves beyond a genealogical account of transgender people’s relationship to psychoanalysis. It uniquely considers the psychical provocations behind clinician’s anxious descriptions and treatments of gender variance, as they have emerged since transsexual’s nosological coinage in the early 20th century. By combining two disparate contemporary fields of study - psychoanalysis and transgender studies - this project also asks how transgender people may re-narrate their relationship to the perverse. To do so, this research investigates many under-considered objects of study, including surrealist transsexual drawings from the mid 1900s, lineages of psychiatric taxonomies, science fiction literature, contemporary transgender art installations, autoethno-pornographic transition narratives, and transgender accounts of undergoing psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Through a combination of critical historiographies, discourse analysis, content analysis, and narrative research, this dissertation contributes to a rapidly emerging non-pathological conversation about the psychic life of gender variance, both for transgender people themselves and the mental health institutions that serve them. Ultimately, it finds perversion to be quite useful as a floating signifier, as its various theoretical containers and clinical meanings are employed to deconstruct institutionalized transphobia’s tenacity. Furthermore, this research centers an archive of historically neglected transgender narratives on mental health as they emerge in the clinic, through case study, and in art or aesthetics.
Thesis, 2022
Gender Reassignment Surgery (GRS) is an increasingly sought-after treatment amongst trans* individuals. Mental-health professionals often stand between trans* patients’ need/desire and their attainment of such services. Utilizing a qualitative, hermeneutic approach, this thesis examines the historical practices in working with this population to understand current therapeutic perspectives. This research utilizes contemporary practices and ideologies informed by relational psychoanalysis to illuminate how the therapeutic process often engages in exactly the bifurcated treatment it ostensibly seeks to transcend. After investigating the various “sides” on which clinicians and their trans* patients fall in considering GRS, the futility of certainty and the unavoidable ambivalence become clearer. The experiences of trans* clients are frequently pathologized, stigmatized, and fetishized, and the question of GRS is situated between transphobia and affirmation. This thesis proposes a therapeutic process that transcends this binary, and instead embraces a toleration for ambiguity, fluidity, and confusion.
Obtenida el, 2007
People who change gender fascinate academic and popular discourse about sex and gender. Central here is the search for a cause in biology or culture. Most sociological investigation of trans people rejects biological explanation. It is social constructionist and concentrates on how people "do" or "perform" gender. Three stories or narratives have been proposed that arise from different types of trans experiences -migrating, oscillating and transcending. These different narratives entail different relations of biology and culture around sex and gender. Some biological researchers and many trans people support a biological explanation for trans people's experience. Recent work in social and biological disciplines points towards ways to utilise both biological and social constructionist inquiry. Informed by interviews with clients and clinicians at a transgender clinic, the connections between the three types of trans stories and attitudes to a biological aetiology are explored and implications for trans health care and legal change are discussed.
Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 2021
While gender dysphoria is a real and acute distress for many transgender people, it is not universal, and it is experienced and oriented to in a myriad of ways. However, its status as a prerequisite for gender-affirming care can lead trans people to feel compelled to amplify its salience in their pursuits for medical support. Through a critical discourse analysis of non-binary healthcare narratives, I trace the relationship between linguistic practices in these care interactions and the gender and sexual logics of the transmedicalist model of transgender care. With a focus on excerpts that center on individuals' descriptions of dysphoria in the consultation room, I contend that these experiences are not straightforward accounts of assimilation to transmedicalist expectations. Rather, when read from a trans linguistic perspective, these strategies are examples of non-binary patients enacting their own interventions on a process over which (it may seem) they have minimal control and present a critical thirding (Tuck 2009) of a dichotomous view of either transnormativity or resistance.
Feminism & Psychology, 2014
This paper, made from an explicitly academic-practitioner stance, aims to highlight some of the problematic ways in which academic writing on trans people, and on the clinicians working in trans healthcare, has been presented in recent years. We argue that much work theorizes trans people and clinicians whilst failing to recognise the full and complex humanity of the people concerned. Also, such work frequently universalises a small number of accounts as if they were representative of ‘the trans person’ or ‘the medical/psy profession' as a whole. We call upon future writers and researchers to pay more attention to the multiplicity and diversity of accounts, and to consider the potential damage of perpetuating certain accounts as fixed or universal.
Sociology of Health & Illness
Atetract Bury (1986) and Nicolson and McLaughlin (1987) have respectively attacked and defended social constructionism in relation to medical sociology. In this article I try to further the debate by considering how a form of constructionism has been used to study a small area of medical knowledge-that relating to transsexualism. The literature on this topic reveals two stories; one claims that transsexualism has been discovered, the other that it has been invented. Ir^ the main part of this article I examine the invention story alongside evidence drawn from a study of the medical treatment of transsexualism in Britain. I argue that the invention story exaggerates the legitimacy of transsexualism and sex-change surgery in this country; that what it depicts as peculiar to transsexualism is also common to other areas of medical knowledge and practice; and that its explanation of the invention of transsexualism is implausible in the light of the data presented. Finally I consider the implications of this case study for the wider issues. I conclude that, whilst some of Bury's criticisms of constructionism apply to the invention story of transsexualism, some of the latter's weaknesses are shared with the discovery story and with Bury's own position.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.