Randomness and Apparent Fractality
1997
Abstract
AI
AI
Fractal structures appear in diverse scientific fields and exhibit scale invariance over limited ranges. This paper proposes a model examining the apparent fractality of systems governed by uniform randomness, suggesting that while such systems lack full scale invariance, they can display fractal-like properties within restricted ranges. An analysis of the fractal dimension through a model of randomly distributed spheres is presented to elucidate these phenomena, with implications for understanding the connectivity between empirical fractal dimensions and the nature of randomness.
References (19)
- B. B. Mandelbrot. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, San Francisco, 1982.
- J. Feder and A. Aharony, editor. Fractals in Physics, Essays in Honour of B.B. Mandelbrot. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1990.
- D. Avnir, editor. The Fractal Approach to Heterogeneous Chemistry: Surfaces, Colloids, Polymers. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 1992.
- A. Bunde, S. Havlin, editor. Fractals in Science. Springer, Berlin, 1994.
- H. E. Stanley, N. Ostrowsky, editor. On Growth and Form. Number 100 in NATO ASI Ser. E. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1986.
- M. Schroeder. Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws. W.H. Freeman, N.Y., 1991.
- Such models include for example: diffusion limited aggregation (T. A. Witten and L. M. Sander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1400 (1981)); percolation models (see e.g., D. Stauffer, Introduction to Percolation Theory, Taylor and Francis, London, 1985); and sand pile models which exhibit self organized critical behavior (P. Bak, C. Tang and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987)).
- D.A. Hamburger, O. Biham and D. Avnir. Phys. Rev. E. 53, 3342 (1996).
- Similar arguments were used recently [C. Tsallis, S.V.F. Levy, A.M.C. Souza and R. Maynard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3589 (1995)] to argue for the ubiquity of Lévy distributions in Nature. There it is the second moment which is imposed as a constraint in an information theoretic argument.
- We have also applied the "Minkowski Sausage" technique. In one dimen- sion the two methods naturally provide identical results while we found that in two and three dimensions they slightly differ. 8 Both methods measure D 0 . Elsewhere we will treat the case of D q , q = 0.
- P. Pfeifer and M. Obert, in Ref.[3], p.16.
- Many authors report their results on a log 2 or log e scale, which may give a misleading impression of a larger scaling range than is actually available. We urge that all results are reported on a log 10 scale.
- H.L. Weissberg. J. Appl. Phys.34, 2636 (1963).
- S. Torquato, G. Stell. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 1505 (1983).
- The idea is to pick one box and then randomly deposit M rods of size d on the unit interval. The probability that the chosen box remains empty is q = [1 -(r + d/L)] M and thus the probability that it will intersect at least one rod is p = 1 -q.
- This excellent agreement appears for all scales in r including the ranges of slope=1. This was also confirmed for other choices of M and d values and even for very large η where apparent fractal behavior is not seen.
- R. Eykholt and D.K. Umberger. Physica D 30, 43 (1988).
- D.A. Hamburger, A.T. Yinnon and R.B. Gerber. Chem. Phys. Lett. 253, 223 (1996).
- D.K. Umberger and J.D. Farmer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 661 (1985).