Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Randomness and Apparent Fractality

1997

Abstract
sparkles

AI

Fractal structures appear in diverse scientific fields and exhibit scale invariance over limited ranges. This paper proposes a model examining the apparent fractality of systems governed by uniform randomness, suggesting that while such systems lack full scale invariance, they can display fractal-like properties within restricted ranges. An analysis of the fractal dimension through a model of randomly distributed spheres is presented to elucidate these phenomena, with implications for understanding the connectivity between empirical fractal dimensions and the nature of randomness.

References (19)

  1. B. B. Mandelbrot. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman, San Francisco, 1982.
  2. J. Feder and A. Aharony, editor. Fractals in Physics, Essays in Honour of B.B. Mandelbrot. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1990.
  3. D. Avnir, editor. The Fractal Approach to Heterogeneous Chemistry: Surfaces, Colloids, Polymers. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 1992.
  4. A. Bunde, S. Havlin, editor. Fractals in Science. Springer, Berlin, 1994.
  5. H. E. Stanley, N. Ostrowsky, editor. On Growth and Form. Number 100 in NATO ASI Ser. E. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1986.
  6. M. Schroeder. Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws. W.H. Freeman, N.Y., 1991.
  7. Such models include for example: diffusion limited aggregation (T. A. Witten and L. M. Sander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1400 (1981)); percolation models (see e.g., D. Stauffer, Introduction to Percolation Theory, Taylor and Francis, London, 1985); and sand pile models which exhibit self organized critical behavior (P. Bak, C. Tang and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987)).
  8. D.A. Hamburger, O. Biham and D. Avnir. Phys. Rev. E. 53, 3342 (1996).
  9. Similar arguments were used recently [C. Tsallis, S.V.F. Levy, A.M.C. Souza and R. Maynard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3589 (1995)] to argue for the ubiquity of Lévy distributions in Nature. There it is the second moment which is imposed as a constraint in an information theoretic argument.
  10. We have also applied the "Minkowski Sausage" technique. In one dimen- sion the two methods naturally provide identical results while we found that in two and three dimensions they slightly differ. 8 Both methods measure D 0 . Elsewhere we will treat the case of D q , q = 0.
  11. P. Pfeifer and M. Obert, in Ref.[3], p.16.
  12. Many authors report their results on a log 2 or log e scale, which may give a misleading impression of a larger scaling range than is actually available. We urge that all results are reported on a log 10 scale.
  13. H.L. Weissberg. J. Appl. Phys.34, 2636 (1963).
  14. S. Torquato, G. Stell. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 1505 (1983).
  15. The idea is to pick one box and then randomly deposit M rods of size d on the unit interval. The probability that the chosen box remains empty is q = [1 -(r + d/L)] M and thus the probability that it will intersect at least one rod is p = 1 -q.
  16. This excellent agreement appears for all scales in r including the ranges of slope=1. This was also confirmed for other choices of M and d values and even for very large η where apparent fractal behavior is not seen.
  17. R. Eykholt and D.K. Umberger. Physica D 30, 43 (1988).
  18. D.A. Hamburger, A.T. Yinnon and R.B. Gerber. Chem. Phys. Lett. 253, 223 (1996).
  19. D.K. Umberger and J.D. Farmer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 661 (1985).