Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

CONCEPT MAPPING AND EXPERT SYSTEMS: EXPLORING SYNERGIES

cmc.ihmc.us

Abstract

Concept maps and expert systems are both in the soft toolbar of knowledge modelling. We have spent nearly two decades developing our expert system shell "Doctus". Several years ago we have seen the first concept mapping solutions and started using them very soon. Frequently we have found ourselves using both tools in a particular research or consultancy project and started to wander how the two could be combined to achieve synergies. We came up with several ideas, typically when we have faced a situation which called for one of the potential synergies. In this paper we present the first of these ideas in elaborated form of a conceptual model and we also mention few additional ideas as our plans for future research. In this first idea we combine different kinds of concept maps and our expert system in order to map organisational knowledge. The expert system here is used in machine learning mode, i.e. the resulting concept map will be capable of learning -this is our intelligent concept map.

References (17)

  1. Ackermann, F. & Eden, C. (2004) Using Causal Mapping -Individual and Group, Traditional and New, In Mi- chael Pidd (Ed.) Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 127-145.
  2. Baddeley, A. (1994) The Magical Number Seven: Still Magic after All These Years?, Psychological Review, 101(2), 353-356.
  3. Bryson, J. M., Ackermann, F., Eden, C. & Finn, C. B. (2004) Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping for Practical Business Results, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Buzan, T. & Buzan, B. (1995) The Mind Map Book: Radiant Thinking -Major Evolution in Human Thought (new edition), London: BBC Books.
  5. Chomsky, N. (1957/2002) Syntactic Structures (2 nd edition), New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
  6. Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (2000) Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (pa- perback edition), Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  7. Eden, C. (1988) Cognitive Mapping, European Journal of Operational Research, 36(1), 1-13.
  8. Eden, C. & Ackermann, F. (1998) Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management, London: Sage Pub- lications.
  9. Fransella, F. & Bannister, D. (1967) A Validation of Repertory Grid Technique as a Measure of Political Con- struing, Acta Psychologica, 26, 97-106.
  10. Kelly, G. A. (1955/1963) A Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs (paperback edition), New York, NY: Norton.
  11. Leake, D. B., Maguitman, A. & Cañas, A. J. (2002) Assessing Conceptual Similarity to Support Concept Map- ping, Fifteenth Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium, Pensacola, FL. Electronic version: http://www.cs.indiana.edu/pub/leake/p-02-02.pdf
  12. Leake, D. B., Maguitman, A., Reichherzer, T., Cañas, A. J., Carvalho, M., Arguedas, M., Brenes, S. & Eskridge, T. (2003) Aiding Knowledge Capture by Searching for Extensions of Knowledge Models, The Second In- ternational Conference On Knowledge Capture, Sanibel Island, FL. Electronic version: http://cmap.ihmc.us/publications/ResearchPapers/KCAP%202003.pdf
  13. Miller, G. A. (1956) The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Pro- cessing Information, The Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
  14. Novak, J. D. (1990) Concept Maps and Vee Diagrams: Two Metacognitive Tools to Facilitate Meaningful Learning, Instructional Science, 19(1), 29-52.
  15. Novak, J. D. & Gowin, B. D. (1984) Learning How to Learn (paperback edition), New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Quillian, M. R. (1968) Semantic Memory, In Marvin L. Minsky (Ed.) Semantic Information Processing, Cam- bridge, MA: MIT Press, 227-270.
  17. Quinlan, J. R. (1986) The Induction of Decision Trees, Machine Learning, 1(1), 81-106.