Metaphysical Disputations II
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
Written by Fr. Francisco Suarez and is Volume II
Related papers
Metaphysical Disputations Volume 8 - English Translation, 2025
Francisco Suárez’s Metaphysical Disputations (Vol. VIII, Disputations 48–54). The closing volume treats action/passion, the categories of “when,” “where,” “position,” “having,” and beings of reason. Disp. XLVIII analyzes action: whether it essentially refers to a principle of acting, whether it essentially refers to a terminus (even immanent) and so belongs in a predicament, which reference is more essential and what specifies action, whether it implies a subject of inherence, its nature/causes/properties, and its genera/species under one genus. Disp. XLIX treats passion: whether it really differs from action, how it relates to motion/change and what it is, whether actual or only aptitudinal inherence belongs to its essence, and the distinction of successive vs. instantaneous passions. Disp. L considers the category “when” and durations: whether duration is distinct from a thing’s esse, the formal notion of duration, eternity and its distinction from created duration (and whether eternity includes a relation of reason), the aevum and its difference from successive durations, the intrinsic duration of permanent corruptibles, time as a proper successive duration and whether distinct from motion, the notion of time as measure and what it measures, and what duration constitutes the “when” category. Disp. LI treats where/ubi: whether ubi is intrinsic or extrinsic to the located body, whether ubi is (just) place, whether it applies only to bodies or also to spirits, the proportion between bodily and spiritual ubi, whether ubi belongs to substances or also to accidents, and the ordering/properties of the category. Disp. LII defines position and its difference from where, and surveys its subjects, species, and properties. Disp. LIII treats habitus (having) as a genus of accident: whether it denominates extrinsically and of what sort, and which subjects/species/properties it bears. Disp. LIV examines beings of reason: whether such beings exist and what their essence is, whether and what causes they have, the division into negation, privation, and relation (its sufficiency), how negation and privation compare, and how relations of reason are devised in various ways.
forthcoming , 2020
In this paper I describe the systematic framework of Disputationes metaphysicae (1597) of Francisco Suárez (1548-1617) and discuss its overall character and significance. I argue that this work, although prima facie straightforwardly clear, is on a deeper level elusive and even manifests a certain dialectical character. This peculiarity may at least in part explain the fact, briefly described in the conclusion, that its impact on the history of philosophy is far more difficult to assess than usually assumed.
This special issue of RIFAJ is dedicated to Metaphysics. First Philosophy, as Aristotle called it, is certainly the most theoretical enterprise undertaken by our philosophical tradition. Among the huge amount of topics inquired within the last two millennia, this issue aims to provide an outline of this attractive discipline following three different themes.
Irish Theological Quarterly, 2010
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2020
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, forthcoming 1 For a suspicion of what would come to be known as the synthetic a priori, see Hume [1998, §12.3]; for a discussion of the inevitable conflict between common sense and any fleshed-out metaphysical theory (with a focus on the metaphysics of mind), see Schwitzgebel [2014]; for a discussion of the relentless persistence of metaphysical disagreement (especially among experts), see, inter alia, Van Inwagen [2004], Frances [2005], Van Inwagen [2009], Kornblith [2013], and Nolan [2016].
Lato Sensu, 2021
in his classic and lengthy study of the medieval discussion of the subject of metaphysics, Ontologie oder Metaphysik, places Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas together in a distinctive tradition precisely because they, along with Richard Rufus, put God outside the scope of the subject of metaphysics and thus are united in a certain understanding of the onto-theological character of metaphysical knowledge.
Irish Theological Quarterly, 2019
Given the importance of methodological considerations for the overarching structure of Francisco Suárez's Metaphysical Disputations, it is surprising how little scholarly work has been done on his philosophical methodology. The present paper aims to make some contribution towards filling that lacuna by analyzing Suárez's account of the first principles of metaphysical science. It proceeds in three parts. The first section will set the stage by surveying requisite background material—particularly Suárez’s account of the ratio entis. Section two then offers a careful exposition of DM III.3, in which we find Suárez’s ex professo treatment of metaphysical first principles. The third and final section of the paper critically reflects upon Suárez’s account. This criticism will proceed along two distinct lines: one bearing upon on the principles of ostensive demonstration, and the other bearing upon the principle of demonstration by reductio ad impossibile.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.