Abstract
Fifty-four percent of Benin's population in rural areas keep indigenous chickens for subsistence livelihoods. Maintaining diversity in chicken gene pools can provide several benefits for farmers, including risk pooling, diversification of income and maintaining availability of chickens suitable for cultural ceremonies. Despite the potential to alleviate poverty by improving indigenous chicken breeds, smallholders' participation in the implementation of breeding programmes is weak. Participation can be improved with greater understanding of the many functions of chickens to smallholders, particularly their economic contribution. The objectives of this study are (1) to evaluate chicken traits including market and non-market values, and (2) to assess factors that influence the conservation of indigenous breeds. Choice modelling, a multi-attribute preference elicitation technique, was applied across 300 households in two districts in Benin (Dassa and Toffo). The results revealed that adaptive and performance traits in chicken breeds are highly valued by farmers and that preferences differed greatly between farmers in the two districts. Many of the preferred traits are expressed in indigenous chickens, whose conservation should be supported through village chicken breeding programmes. However, a preference for white plumage, most common among exotic breeds, could hinder conservation of indigenous breeds, which are mostly brown or black. From an economic point of view, the aim of conserving culturally significant and disease resistant indigenous breeds is contrary to the objective of increasing chicken productivity. The lack of knowledge about chicken characterization and a lack of flock management were identified as further severe constraints to village breeding and conservation programmes.
References (52)
- Abdelqader, A., Wollny, C.B.A. and Gauly, M., 2008. On-farm investigation of local chicken biodiversity and performance potentials in rural areas of Jordan. Animal Genetic Resources Information 43, 49-58.
- Adégbidi, A., Adjovi, E., Ahohounkpanzon, M., Djohi, D., Fagnissè, S. and Houndékon, V., 1999. Profil de pauvreté au Bénin: in cahier de recherche de l'équipe de micro-impact of macro-economic policy (MIMAP). Université Nationale du Bénin (Université d'Abomey- Calavi).
- Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B., Hanemann, W.M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Özdemiroğlu, E., Pearce, D.W., Sugden, R. and Swanson, S., 2003. Guidelines for the Use of Stated Preference Techniques for the Valuation of Preferences for Non-market Goods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
- Benítez, F., 2002. Reasons for the use and Conservation of Some Local Genetic Resources in Poultry. 7 th World Congress on Genetic Applied to Livestock Production, August 19-23, 2002, Montpellier, France.
- Bennett, J. and Blamey, R., 2001. The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation, Edward Elgar, London, UK.
- Boxall, P.C. and Adamowicz, W.L., 1999. Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: The Use of Latent Class Analysis. Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta Staff Paper, 99-02.
- Chrysostome,C., 2002. Enquêtes sur la Productivité Des Volailles en Milieu Villageois: le Choix d'une Méthodologie, p. 8.
- Dessie, T. and Ogle, B., 2001. Village Poultry Production System in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 33, 521-537.
- Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), 1998. Primary guidelines for development of national farm animal genetic resources management plans. FAO, Rome, Italy.
- FAO, 2000. World Watch List for Domestic Animal Diversity, 3 rd Ed., FAO, Rome, Italy.
- FAO, 2004. FAO Statistical Databases. http://faostat.fao.org FAO, 2007. The state of the world's animal genetic resources for food and agriculture, edited by Barbara Rischkowsky and Dafydd Pilling, Rome, Italy.
- Gondwe, T.N. and Wollny, C.B.A., 2007. Local chicken production system in Malawi: Household flock structure, dynamics, management and health. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39, 103-113.
- Greene, W.H. 2003. Econometric Analysis, 5 th Edition, Prentice Hall, New York, USA.
- Halima, H., Neser, F., Van Marle-Koster, E. and De Kock, A., 2007. Village-based indigenous chicken production system in north-west Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39, 189-197.
- Hausman, J. and Mc Fadden, D., 1984. Specification tests in Econometrics, Econometrica 46, 1251-1271.
- Hensher, D.A. and Greene, W.H., 2003. The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 30, 133-176.
- Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M. and Greene, W.H., 2005a. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
- Hensher, D., Shore, N. and Train, K., 2005b. Household's willingness to pay for water service attributes. Environment & Resource Economics 32, 509-531.
- Houndonougbo, M.F., 2005. Micro Credit Impacts on Family Poultry System: A Case Study in two Region of Benin. Master of Science These. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Horst, P., 1989. Native fowl as reservoir for genomes and major genes with direct and indirect effects on the adaptability and their potential for tropically oriented breeding plans. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 53(3), 93-101.
- Hu, W., Boehle, K., Cox, L. and Pan, M. Economic values of dolphin excursions in Hawaii: A stated choice analysis. Marine Resource Economics 24, 61-76.
- Kitalyi, A.J., 1998. Village chicken production systems in rural Africa: Household food security and gender issues. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper, 142, Rome, Italy..
- Kuhfeld, W.F., 2003. Marketing research methods in SAS: Experimental design, choice, conjoint, and graphical techniques. Cary NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA.
- Kumaresan, A., Bujarbaruah, K., Pathak, K., Chhetri, B., Ahmed, S. and Haunshi, S., 2008. Analysis of a village chicken production system and performance of improved dual purpose chickens under a subtropical hill agro-ecosystem in India. Tropical Animal Health and Production 40, 395-402.
- Lancaster, K.J., 1966. A new approach to consumer theory, Journal of Political Economy 74, 132-157.
- Louviere, J., Hensher, D.A., Swait, J.D. and Adamowicz, W., 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
- McFadden, D., 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka, P. (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, New York: Academic Press.
- McFadden, D. and Train, K., 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15(5), 447-470.
- Muchadeyi, F.C., Sibanda, S., Kusina, N.T., Kusina, J.F. and Makuza, S.M., 2005. Village Chicken Flock Dynamics and the Contribution of Chickens to Household Livelihoods in a Smallholder Farming Area in Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and Production 37, 333- 344.
- Muchadeyi, F., Wollny, C., Eding, H., Weigend, S., Makuza, S. and Simianer, H., 2007. Variation in village chicken production systems among agro-ecological zones of Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39, 453-461.
- OANDA, 2009. FXConverterDownload, http://www.oanda.com
- Omondi, I., Baltenweck, I., Drucker, A.G., Obare, G. and Zander, K.K., 2008a. Economic Valuation of Sheep Genetic Resources: Implications for Sustainable Utilization in the Kenyan Semi-arid Tropics. Tropical Animal Health and Production 40(8), 615-626.
- Omondi, I., Baltenweck, I., Drucker, A., Obare, G. and Zander, K.K., 2008b. Valuing Goat Genetic Resources: A Pro-poor Growth Strategy in the Kenyan Semi-arid Tropics. Tropical Animal Health and Production 40(8), 583-596.
- Onibon, P. and Sodégla, H., 2005. Etude de la sous-filière "Aviculture modern" au Bénin. Rapport final, pp 3-86.
- Ouma, E., Abdulai, A. and Drucker, A., 2007. Measuring Heterogeneous Preferences for Cattle Traits among Cattle-Keeping Households in East Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(4), 1005-1019.
- Pearce, D. and Moran, D., 1994. The economic valuation of biodiversity. The World Conservation Union (IUCN), Earthcan Publications Ltd, London, UK.
- Rege, J.E.O. and Gibson, J.P., 2003. Animal genetic resources and economic development: issues in relation to economic valuation, Ecological Economics 45, 319-330.
- Rosen, S., 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition, Journal of Political Economy 82, 34-55.
- Ruto, E., Garrod, G. and Scarpa, R., 2008. Valuing animal genetic resources: a choice modeling application to indigenous cattle in Kenya. Agricultural Economics 38(1), 89-98.
- Scarpa, R., Kristjanson, P., Ruto, E., Radeny, M., Drucker, A., Rege, E., 2003. Valuing indigenous farm animal genetic resources in Kenya: a comparison of stated and revealed preference estimates, Ecological Economics 45(3), 409-426.
- Scarpa, R., Ferrini, S. and Willis, K., 2005. Performance of error component models for status-quo effects in choice experiments. In: R. Scarpa and A. Alberini (Ed.), Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics, Springer Publisher, pp. 247-273.
- Scarpa, R., Willis, K. and Acutt, M., 2007. Valuing externalities from water supply: status- quo, choice complexity and individual random effects in panel kernel logit analysis of choice experiments, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50(4), 449-466.
- Scarpa, R. and Rose, J.M., 2008. Designs efficiency for nonmarket valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource 52, 253-282.
- Scarpa, R., Thiene, M. and Marangon, F., 2008. Using flexible taste distribution to value collective reputation for environmentally friendly production methods. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 56, 145-162.
- Scarpa, R. and Willis, K., 2009. Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households' for micro-generation technologies. Energy Economics, available online, doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.004.
- Simianer, H., 2005. Decision making in livestock conservation. Ecological Economics 53, 559-572.
- Train, K.E., 1998. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics 74(2), 230-239.
- Train, K., 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
- Vermeulen, B., Goos, P., Scarpa, R and Vandebroek, M., 2008. Efficient and robust willingness-to-pay designs for choice experiments: some evidence from simulation. Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Weitzman, M.L., 1998. The Noah's Ark problem. Econometrica 66, 1279-1298.
- Zander, K.K. and Drucker, A.G., 2008. Conserving what's important: using choice model scenarios to value local cattle breeds in East Africa. Ecological Economics 68, 34-45.
- Zander, K.K., Drucker, A.G., Holm-Müller, K. and Simianer, H., 2009. Choosing the "cargo" for Noah's Ark -Applying Weitzman's approach to Borana cattle in East Africa. Ecological Economics 68, 2051-2057.