Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Research Aim and Objectives
Objectives
Supply Chain Design
Concept and Scope
Design Applications
Method of Developing a SCM Strategy
Supply Chain Network Design
Collection of Supporting Data
Model Analysis and Interpretation
Statistical Distribution
Sensitivity Analysis
Strategic Objective Model
Drivers Affecting Supply Chain Network Design
Introduction
Background
Case Study
Overall Method
Demand Analysis
Discussion of Results
Conclusions
Limitations and Future Work
References
All Topics
Business and Management
Operations and Supply Chain Management

An integrated framework for improving supply chain performance

Profile image of Mukhtar ElberegliMukhtar Elberegli
https://doi.org/10.7190/SHU-THESIS-00110
visibility

…

description

163 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

This thesis is dedicated to my late mother (Fatima), my father (Ali) and my brothers and sisters (Fouziya, Husain, Halima, Mohamed, Basma, Hana, and Abdu-Allah). Last but not least, to my darling wife (Manani) for her patience and sacrifice during my PhD journey. To my beloved children (Abduerehman, and Ali) for their endless love.

Related papers

Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
nico amanta

fdafdfadfdafdfdsfsdfdsfsdfdfl

View PDFchevron_right
Improving Supply Chain Operations Performance Track: Logistics and Distribution
Bernardo Villarreal

The intense competitive environment which characterizes many industry sectors is forcing many firms to look for diverse strategies to improve their performance and customer satisfaction. At first, these strategies focused on improving each company's operations, bringing them to higher performance levels. Today this is not enough. It is becoming recognized that to stay competitive, companies need to look for improvement opportunities available due to the integration and excellent management of the supply chain to which they belong. The project described in this paper deals with defining and implementing an improvement program of the supply chain of glass products for a Mexican company located in Monterrey, Mexico. The purpose of the program is to increase customer satisfaction at lower inventory levels. This on-going program consists of the implementation of several projects including the centralization of end product inventories, improving forecasting precision, promoting alliances with distributors and redefining its commercial product catalog stand out. The report presents a summary of the evolution of the program, a description of the potential benefits and the current status of the efforts.

View PDFchevron_right
Supply Chains: A Manager's Guide
민석 강
View PDFchevron_right
Supply Chain Management for the Saudi oil company ARAMCO
osama meky

This study seeks to identify key aspects of success in ARAMCO's supply chain management. Over the years, Aramco has been able to develop and outdo other companies within the same industry. The focus of the report therefore is to identify some of the areas that the company is successful. In addition, the study seeks to propose some of the measures that the company could take to improve its supply chain management. The study looks at the areas where the company has had failures and proposes some of the approaches that could be appropriate in mitigating the problem.

View PDFchevron_right
SUPPLY CHAIN EXCELLENCE-FUTURE SCENARIO A CASE STUDY
rakesh singh
View PDFchevron_right
Maximizing the performance of an organization by its supply chain
zineb azarkan

International Journal of Performance & Organizations

Supply Chain Management (SCM) becomes so crucial and essential for organizations in order to succeed in any market, but is it always the case? Of course not! There are many examples of even large companies that failed because of wrong management of their supply chain, such as Webvan and Borders. From its conception, planning, and until integration and management, the supply chain must respect few conditions (the 3Ts that compose the effective collaboration) to insure efficiency and success. Considering the companies with the best practice of supply chain management, such as Nokia, Procter & Gamble, and Wal-Mart, strong collaboration and relationships with partners were always the reason behind their remarkable success. Therefore, the main concern of every organization that is looking to improve its performance should not be just the necessity of integrating and managing the supply chain, but what really matters is how to apply it in the right/efficient way

View PDFchevron_right
Supply Chain Management
Sl domerique

The world of supply chain management (SCM) is evolving rapidly, transforming from traditional, linear systems into dynamic, interconnected networks that prioritize agility, resilience, and sustainability. This book is a comprehensive guide for anyone seeking to navigate and master the complexities of modern SCM, offering insights that connect theory to real-world application. The Importance of Supply Chains Supply chains are no longer just operational mechanisms; they are strategic assets that determine the success of organizations across industries. Whether ensuring efficient delivery of goods, adapting to global disruptions, or minimizing environmental impact, supply chains shape competitive advantage and drive innovation. This book equips readers with the knowledge to address these challenges and capitalize on emerging opportunities. What You’ll Learn Each chapter examines a key aspect of SCM, providing actionable insights and practical tools. You will explore how to: • Redesign supply chains to enhance efficiency, adaptability, and resilience. • Harness technologies like AI, blockchain, and IoT for smarter decision-making. • Respond to demand fluctuations with data-driven strategies. • Build sustainable and ethical supply chains that align with global priorities. • Real-world examples from industry leaders.

View PDFchevron_right
Born to change: supply chain management is a journey and not a destination
Marcus Ambe

2015

 Colleagues from the College of Economics & Management Sciences, broader Unisa community and other institutions;  Friends, associates and family members;  Distinguished guests; ladies and gentlemen. In the name of the Almighty Lord, I wish to salute and welcome you all to this inaugural lecture. Please accept my heartfelt appreciation for your profound choice to come and grace this occasion which marks my formal acceptance to the professorial rank. 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE LECTURE AND ACADEMIC CAREER I am overjoyed to stand before you all today to give an account of my stewardship up to the present moment. The title of my lecture is "Born to change: supply chain management is about the journey and not the destination". Ladies and gentlemen, my career in research, although relatively short, has been interesting; taking me on many different paths, often smooth, sometimes tedious, seldom tiring and once in a while frustrating. I hope you can share in my excitement because this is an occasion that comes but once in a lifetime. While it would have pleased me to acknowledge all the people who played a role in my development from my birth to this point in my career, time considerations and the prioritised business of this day restrict me to mention only a few. Allow me to first acknowledge the special role played by the following people:  Firstly, I wish to acknowledge my parents (the late Mr Joseph Ambe and Ma Bibiana Didi Ambe);  My wife, Florence Ambe, and my children, Didi Queen McFlore Ambe, Azah Hanni Ambe, and Intaher Bethel Ambe);

View PDFchevron_right
Supply Chain Management: A Review of Approaches, Practices and Impact on Performance
Ali Davoudi

International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2019

The Supply Chain Management (SCM) is a research area that has received a lot of attention from many researchers in different disciplines. The multidisciplinary origin of SCM has led to a variety of definitions and approaches. Despite the vast body of academic literature on the subject, there are few examples of successful SCM implementations. Indeed, the implementation of SCM requires the deployment of a set of practices that the company should establish to ensure its success. The implementation of SCM practices can impact the various components of the company's performance. The aim of this paper is to review the different definitions and approaches of the SCM, present the practices that allow companies to better manage their supply chain. Also analyze the various performance measures and the impact of SCM practices on the overall performance.

View PDFchevron_right
ASSESSING THE PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE OF SUPPLY CHAIN
Mohammad bilal Kazi
View PDFchevron_right

References (164)

  1. ADHITYA, Arief, HALIM, Iskandar and SRINIVASAN, Rajagopalan (2011). Decision Support for Green Supply Chain Operations by Integrating Dynamic Simulation and LCA Indicators: Diaper Case Study. Environmental science & technology, 45 (23), 10178-10185.
  2. AFFONSO, R. C., LIU, Y. and ZOLGHADRI, M. (2013). A global framework of activities integrating product & supply chain design. [online]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46 (24), 505-510.
  3. ALFALLA-LUQUE, Rafaela, MEDINA-LOPEZ, Carmen and DEY, Prasanta Kumar (2013). Supply chain integration framework using literature review. Production planning & control, 24 (8-9), 800-817.
  4. AMBE, Intaher M. (2012). Determining an optimal supply chain strategy. Journal of transport and supply chain management, 6 (1), 126-147.
  5. AMBE, Intaher M. and BADENHORST-WEISS, Johanna A. (2011). Framework for choosing supply chain strategies. African journal of business management, 5 (35), 13388-13397.
  6. AMBE, I. M. (2014). Key indicators for optimising supply chain performance: The case of light vehicle manufacturers In South Africa. Journal of applied business research, 30 (1), 277-289.
  7. AMER, LE and ELTAWIL, AB COLLABORATIVE SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORK DESIGN: STATE OF THE ART AND SOLUTION FRAMEWORK.
  8. ARONSSON, Håkan, ABRAHAMSSON, Mats and SPENS, Karen (2011). Developing lean and agile health care supply chains. Supply chain management, 16 (3), 176-183.
  9. ARZU AKYUZ, Goknur and ERMAN ERKAN, Turan (2010). Supply chain performance measurement: a literature review. International journal of production research, 48 (17), 5137-5155.
  10. BAGHALIAN, Atefeh, REZAPOUR, Shabnam and FARAHANI, Reza Zanjirani (2013). Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: A real-life case. European journal of operational research, 227 (1), 199-215.
  11. BAUD-LAVIGNE, Bertrand, AGARD, Bruno and PENZ, Bernard (2012). Mutual impacts of product standardization and supply chain design. International journal of production economics, 135 (1), 50-60.
  12. BAUD-LAVIGNE, Bertrand, AGARD, Bruno and PENZ, Bernard (2012). Mutual impacts of product standardization and supply chain design. International journal of production economics, 135 (1), 50-60.
  13. BAUMGARTNER, Kerstin, FUETTERER, André and THONEMANN, Ulrich W. (2012). Supply chain design considering economies of scale and transport frequencies. European journal of operational research, 218 (3), 789-800.
  14. BAYAT, Ayse, et al. (2011). Sustainably driven supply chains. Industrial engineer, 43 (8), 26-31.
  15. BEAMON, Benita M. (1998). Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods. International journal of production economics, 55 (3), 281-294.
  16. BEHROUZI, F., WONG, K. Y. and BEHROUZI, F. (2011). A study on lean supply chain performance measures of SMEs in the automotive industry. In: IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, 237-241.
  17. BIRHANU, Dagne, LANKA, Krishnanand and RAO, A. Neelakanteswara
  18. A survey of classifications in supply chain strategies. Procedia engineering, 97 , 2289-2297.
  19. BOLSTORFF, Peter and ROSENBAUM, Robert G. (2007). Supply chain excellence: a handbook for dramatic improvement using the SCOR model. AMACOM/American Management Association.
  20. BRAZIOTIS, Christos, et al. (2013). Supply chains and supply networks: distinctions and overlaps. Supply chain management, 18 (6), 644-652.
  21. BÜYÜKÖZKAN, Gülçin and BERKOL, Çiğdem (2011). Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert systems with applications, 38 (11), 13731-13748.
  22. CABRAL, Izunildo, et al. (2011). An information model in lean, agile, resilient and green supply chains. In: Communication software and networks (ICCSN), 2011 IEEE 3rd international conference on, IEEE, 776-780.
  23. Candace Y. Yi, E.W.T. Ngai and K-L. Moon (2011). Supply chain flexibility in an uncertain environment: exploratory findings from five case studies. Supply chain management, 16 (4), 271-283.
  24. CARTER, Craig R. and ROGERS, Dale S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 38 (5), 360-387.
  25. CHAABANE, Amin, RAMUDHIN, Amar and PAQUET, Marc (2012). Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. International journal of production economics, 135 (1), 37-49.
  26. CHAHARSOOGHI, S. Kamal and HEYDARI, Jafar (2011). Strategic Fit in Supply Chain Management: A Coordination Perspective. INTECH Open Access Publisher.
  27. CHANG, Yoon and MAKATSORIS, Harris (2001). Supply chain modeling using simulation. International journal of simulation, 2 (1), 24-30.
  28. CHARDINE-BAUMANN, Emilie and BOTTA-GENOULAZ, Val (2014). A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices. Computers & industrial engineering, 76 , 138-147.
  29. CHOPRA, Sunil and MEINDL, Peter (2007). Supply chain management. Strategy, planning & operation. Springer.
  30. CHRISTOPHER, Martin (2005). Logistics and supply chain management: creating value-added networks. Pearson education.
  31. CHRISTOPHER, Martin, PECK, Helen and TOWILL, Denis (2006). A taxonomy for selecting global supply chain strategies. The international journal of logistics management, 17 (2), 277-287.
  32. CLOSS, David J. and MCGARRELL, Edmund F. (2004). Enhancing security throughout the supply chain. IBM Center for the Business of Government Washington, DC.
  33. COLICCHIA, Claudia, DALLARI, Fabrizio and MELACINI, Marco (2010). Increasing supply chain resilience in a global sourcing context. Production planning & control, 21 (7), 680-694.
  34. CONTRERAS, Homero H., et al. (2012). A Strategic and Standardized Simulation Model for Distribution Networks. In: IIE annual conference. proceedings, Institute of Industrial Engineers-Publisher, 1.
  35. COROMINAS, Albert, et al. (2015). Methodological elements of supply chain design. International journal of production research, (ahead-of-print), 1-14.
  36. COROMINAS, A., et al. (2015). Methodological elements of supply chain design. International journal of production research, 53 (16), 5017-5030.
  37. COUNCIL, Supply Chain (2012). Supply chain operations reference model: Revision 11.0. Chicago, IL, .
  38. DAABOUL, Joanna, et al. (2014). Value networks: pulling the triggers. A combined approach of modelling and simulation for performance evaluation. International journal of computer integrated manufacturing, 27 (7), 609-623.
  39. DANESE, Pamela and ROMANO, Pietro (2011). Supply chain integration and efficiency performance: a study on the interactions between customer and supplier integration. Supply chain management: An international journal, 16 (4), 220-230.
  40. DANESE, Pamela, ROMANO, Pietro and FORMENTINI, Marco (2013). The impact of supply chain integration on responsiveness: The moderating effect of using an international supplier network. Transportation research: Part E, 49 (1), 125-140.
  41. DE WAAL, André and KERKLAAN, Leo (2010). A performance management readiness review framework for governmental service providers. Business horizons, 53 (4), 405-412.
  42. DU TOIT, Deirdre and VLOK, Pieter-Jan (2014). Supply chain management: A framework of understanding. South african journal of industrial engineering, 25 (3), 25-38.
  43. DUBEY, Rameshwar, GUNASEKARAN, Angappa and CHILDE, Stephen J. (2015). The design of a responsive sustainable supply chain network under uncertainty. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology, , 1-19.
  44. DURGA PRASAD, KG, VENKATA SUBBAIAH, K. and NARAYANA RAO, K. (2014). Supply chain design through QFD-based optimization. Journal of manufacturing technology management, 25 (5), 712-733.
  45. EL-AAL, Mohammad Abd, et al. (2008). SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT SIMULATION TYPES: A. Journal of engineering sciences, assiut university, 36 (3), 675-687.
  46. FERREIRA, Luciano and BORENSTEIN, Denis (2011). Normative agent- based simulation for supply chain planning. Journal of the operational research society, 62 (3), 501-514.
  47. FISHER, Marshall L. (1997). What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard business review, 75 , 105-117.
  48. FITKOV-NORRIS, Elena (2010). Literature overview of approaches for enterprise-wide modelling, simulation and optimisation.
  49. FORBES, Catherine, et al. (2011). Statistical distributions. John Wiley & Sons. FUMERO, Yanina, CORSANO, Gabriela and MONTAGNA, Jorge M. (2013). Integrated modeling framework for supply chain design considering multiproduct production facilities. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 52 (46), 16247-16266.
  50. GAN, Thiam-Soon and GRUNOW, Martin (2013). Concurrent Product - Supply Chain Design: A Conceptual Framework & Literature Review. [online].
  51. Procedia CIRP, 7 (Supplement C), 91-96. http://www.sciencedirect.com.lcproxy.shu.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S2212827 113002230.
  52. GARCIA, Daniel J. and YOU, Fengqi (2015). Supply chain design and optimization: Challenges and opportunities. Computers & chemical engineering, .
  53. GEORGIADIS, Michael C., et al. (2011). Optimal design of supply chain networks under uncertain transient demand variations. Omega, 39 (3), 254- 272. GHOSH, Anupam, DAS, Sujoy and DESHPANDE, Aashish (2014). Effect of Responsiveness and Process Integration in Supply Chain Coordination. IUP journal of supply chain management, 11 (1), 7-17.
  54. GIANNOCCARO, Ilaria (2011). Assessing the influence of the organization in the supply chain management using NK simulation. International journal of production economics, 131 (1), 263-272.
  55. GOFF, JA, OLSON, HC and DUNCAN, CS (2000). Correlation of side-scan backscatter intensity with grain-size distribution of shelf sediments, New Jersey margin. Geo-marine letters, 20 (1), 43-49.
  56. GOPAL, PRC and THAKKAR, Jitesh (2012). A review on supply chain performance measures and metrics: 2000-2011. International journal of productivity and performance management, 61 (5), 518-547.
  57. GOSLING, Jonathan, NAIM, Mohamed and TOWILL, Denis (2013). A supply chain flexibility framework for engineer-to-order systems. Production planning & control, 24 (7), 552-566.
  58. GOVINDAN, Kannan, FATTAHI, Mohammad and KEYVANSHOKOOH, Esmaeil (2017). Supply chain network design under uncertainty: A comprehensive review and future research directions. [online]. European Journal of Operational Research, 263 (1), 108-141.
  59. GRACIA, María D. and QUEZADA, Luis E. (2016). A framework for strategy formulation in sustainable supply chains: a case study in the electric industry. NETNOMICS: Economic research and electronic networking, 17 (1), 3-27.
  60. GUMUS, Alev Taskin, GUNERI, Ali Fuat and KELES, Selcan (2009). Supply chain network design using an integrated neuro-fuzzy and MILP approach: A comparative design study. Expert systems with applications, 36 (10), 12570- 12577.
  61. GUMUS, Alev Taskin, GUNERI, Ali Fuat and ULENGIN, Fusun (2010). A new methodology for multi-echelon inventory management in stochastic and neuro-fuzzy environments. International journal of production economics, 128 (1), 248-260.
  62. GUNASEKARAN, A., PATEL, C. and MCGAUGHEY, Ronald E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. [online]. International Journal of Production Economics, 87 (3), 333-347.
  63. HASSINI, Elkafi, SURTI, Chirag and SEARCY, Cory (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International journal of production economics, 140 (1), 69-82.
  64. HILLETOFTH, Per and LÄTTILÄ, Lauri (2012). Agent based decision support in the supply chain context. Industrial management & data systems, 112 (8), 1217-1235.
  65. HILLETOFTH, Per (2012). Differentiation focused supply chain design. Industrial management & data systems, 112 (9), 1274-1291.
  66. HOFFMAN, Julien I. E. (2015). Chapter 18 -The Poisson Distribution. [online]. Academic Press. 259-278.
  67. HOLWEG, Matthias and HELO, Petri (2014). Defining value chain architectures: Linking strategic value creation to operational supply chain design. International journal of production economics, 147 , 230-238.
  68. HONG, Paul, et al. (2012). Extending the efficient and responsive supply chains framework to the green context. Benchmarking: An international journal, 19 (4/5), 463-480.
  69. HUAN, Samuel H., SHEORAN, Sunil K. and WANG, Ge (2004). A review and analysis of supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Supply chain management: An international journal, 9 (1), 23-29.
  70. HUO, Yanfang, et al. (2009). A framework and key techniques for supply chain integration. In: Supply Chain the Way to Flat Organisation. InTech, .
  71. ISOTALO, Jarkko (2001). Basics of statistics. Finland: University of tampere, .
  72. IVANOV, Dmitry (2010). An adaptive framework for aligning (re) planning decisions on supply chain strategy, design, tactics, and operations. International journal of production research, 48 (13), 3999-4017.
  73. JABAREEN, Yosef (2009). Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International journal of qualitative methods, 8 (4), 49-62.
  74. JAYA KRISHNA, S. (2011). Supply Chain Collaboration: Evolution Management Framework. International journal of global business, 4 (1), 23-
  75. JAYARAM, Jayanth, DIXIT, Mita and MOTWANI, Jaideep (2014). Supply chain management capability of small and medium sized family businesses in India: A multiple case study approach. International journal of production economics, 147 , 472-485.
  76. JOTHIMANI, D. and SARMAH, S. P. (2014). Supply chain performance measurement for third party logistics. Benchmarking, 21 (6), 944-963.
  77. KHAN, Muhammad Burdbar and SHEIKH, Naeem Nisar (2012). Human resource development, motivation and Islam. Journal of management development, 31 (10), 1021-1034.
  78. KIM, Dong-Young, KUMAR, Vinod and KUMAR, Uma (2010). Performance assessment framework for supply chain partnership. Supply chain management: An international journal, 15 (3), 187-195.
  79. KIM, Bowon (2013). Competitive priorities and supply chain strategy in the fashion industry. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16 (2), 214-242.
  80. KISPERSKA-MORON, Danuta and DE HAAN, Job (2011). Improving supply chain performance to satisfy final customers:"Leagile" experiences of a polish distributor. International journal of production economics, 133 (1), 127- 134. KLIBI, Walid, MARTEL, Alain and GUITOUNI, Adel (2010). The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: a critical review. European journal of operational research, 203 (2), 283-293.
  81. KOCAOĞLU, Batuhan, GÜLSÜN, Bahadır and TANYAŞ, Mehmet (2013). A SCOR based approach for measuring a benchmarkable supply chain performance. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 24 (1), 113-132.
  82. KOTHARI, Chakravanti Rajagopalachari (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
  83. KRISTIANTO, Yohanes, et al. (2012). A decision support system for integrating manufacturing and product design into the reconfiguration of the supply chain networks. Decision support systems, 52 (4), 790-801.
  84. KUMAR, Sameer, SPENCE, Wendell and SWARTZER, Philip (2012). Lessons for strategic organizational growth -performance challenges for U.S. automakers. Human systems management, 31 (3), 203-218.
  85. LAMBERT, Douglas M., GARCÍA-DASTUGUE, Sebastián J. and CROXTON, Keely L. (2005). An evaluation of process-oriented supply chain management frameworks. Journal of business logistics, 26 (1), 25-51.
  86. LAMBIASE, Alessandro, et al. (2013). Strategic planning and design of supply chains: A literature review. Int.J.eng.bus.manag, 5 (49), 1-11.
  87. LEE, Hau L. (2002). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California management review, 44 (3), 105-119.
  88. LEOŃCZUK, Dorota (2016). Categories of Supply Chain Performance Indicators: an Overview of Approaches. Business, management and education, 14 (1), 103-115.
  89. MALLIDIS, Ioannis, DEKKER, Rommert and VLACHOS, Dimitrios (2012). The impact of greening on supply chain design and cost: a case for a developing region. Journal of transport geography, 22 , 118-128.
  90. MANSOORNEJAD, Behrang, PISTIKOPOULOS, Efstratios N. and STUART, Paul R. (2013). Scenario-based strategic supply chain design and analysis for the forest biorefinery using an operational supply chain model. International journal of production economics, 144 (2), 618-634.
  91. MARCHESINI, M. M. P. and ALCÂNTARA, R. L. C. (2016). Logistics activities in supply chain business process: A conceptual framework to guide their implementation. International journal of logistics management, 27 (1), 6-
  92. MATOPOULOS, Aristides, BARROS, Ana Cristina and VORST, J. G. A. J. (J (2015). Resource-efficient supply chains: a research framework, literature review and research agenda. Supply chain management, 20 (2), 218-236.
  93. MELNYK, Steven A., NARASIMHAN, Ram and DECAMPOS, Hugo A. (2014). Supply chain design: issues, challenges, frameworks and solutions. International journal of production research, 52 (7), 1887-1896.
  94. MENTZER, John T., et al. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of business logistics, 22 (2), 1-25.
  95. METTA, Haritha and BADURDEEN, Fazleena (2013). Integrating sustainable product and supply chain design: modeling issues and challenges. Engineering management, IEEE transactions on, 60 (2), 438-446.
  96. METTA, Haritha and BADURDEEN, Fazleena (2013). Integrating Sustainable Product and Supply Chain Design: Modeling Issues and Challenges. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 60 (2), 438-446.
  97. MIN, Hokey and ZHOU, Gengui (2002). Supply chain modeling: past, present and future. Computers & industrial engineering, 43 (1-2), 231-249.
  98. Ming-Hon Hwang (2010). Establishment of a comprehensive framework for strategic supply chain management. Human systems management, 29 (3), 127-137.
  99. MISHRA, Rohita Kumar (2012). Measuring supply chain efficiency: a DEA approach. J oper supply chain manag, 5 (1), 45-68.
  100. MITTERMAYER, Herwig and RODRÍGUEZ-MONROY, Carlos (2013). Evaluating alternative industrial network organizations and information systems. Industrial management & data systems, 113 (1), 77-95.
  101. MOHAMMADI, Mohsen (2017). Challenges of Business Process Modeling in Logistics and Supply Chain Management. International journal of computer science and network security, 17 (6), 259-265.
  102. MONCAYO-MARTÍNEZ, Luis A. and ZHANG, David Z. (2011). Multi- objective ant colony optimisation: A meta-heuristic approach to supply chain design. International journal of production economics, 131 (1), 407-420.
  103. MORTENSEN, Mads and ARLBJØRN, Jan (2012). Inter-organisational supplier development: the case of customer attractiveness and strategic fit. Supply chain management: An international journal, 17 (2), 152-171.
  104. MULA, Josefa, et al. (2013). A system dynamics model for the supply chain procurement transport problem: Comparing spreadsheets, fuzzy programming and simulation approaches. International journal of production research, 51 (13), 4087-4104.
  105. NASLUND, Dag and WILLIAMSON, Steven (2010). What is management in supply chain management?-a critical review of definitions, frameworks and terminology. Journal of management policy and practice, 11 (4), 11-28.
  106. NEPAL, Bimal, MONPLAISIR, Leslie and FAMUYIWA, Oluwafemi (2012). Matching product architecture with supply chain design. European journal of operational research, 216 (2), 312-325.
  107. OH, Seungjin, RYU, Kwangyeol and JUNG, Mooyoung (2013). Reconfiguration framework of a supply network based on flexibility strategies. Computers & industrial engineering, 65 (1), 156-165.
  108. OLIVARES-BENITEZ, Elias, RÍOS-MERCADO, Roger Z. and GONZÁLEZ- VELARDE, José Luis (2013). A metaheuristic algorithm to solve the selection of transportation channels in supply chain design. International journal of production economics, 145 (1), 161-172.
  109. PALMA-MENDOZA, Jaime (2014). Analytical hierarchy process and SCOR model to support supply chain re-design. International journal of information management, 34 (5), 634-638.
  110. PALMA-MENDOZA, Jaime, NEAILEY, Kevin and ROY, Rajat (2014). Business process re-design methodology to support supply chain integration. International journal of information management, 34 (2), 167-176.
  111. PANNELL, David J. (1997). Sensitivity analysis: strategies, methods, concepts, examples. Agric econ, 16 , 139-152.
  112. PARMIGIANI, Anne, KLASSEN, Robert D. and RUSSO, Michael V. (2011). Efficiency meets accountability: Performance implications of supply chain configuration, control, and capabilities. Journal of operations management, 29 (3), 212-223.
  113. PERSSON, Fredrik and ARALDI, Mirko (2009). The development of a dynamic supply chain analysis tool-Integration of SCOR and discrete event simulation. International journal of production economics, 121 (2), 574-583.
  114. PETROVIC, Dobrila (2001). Simulation of supply chain behaviour and performance in an uncertain environment. International journal of production economics, 71 (1), 429-438.
  115. PIRARD, Florence, IASSINOVSKI, Serguei and RIANE, Fouad (2011). A simulation based approach for supply network control. International journal of production research, 49 (24), 7205-7226.
  116. PONIS, Stavros T., et al. (2013). Modeling supply chain processes: a review and critical evaluation of available reference models. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium and 24th national conference on operational research, Hellenic Operational Research Society Athens, 270-276.
  117. POPPER, Karl (1994). The Myth ofthe Framework., In defenceofscience and rationality.
  118. PRASAD, K. G. D., SUBBAIAH, K. V. and RAO, K. N. (2014). Supply chain design through QFD-based optimization. Journal of manufacturing technology management, , 712-733.
  119. PricewaterhouseCoopers and American Production and Inventory Control Society( 2014), Sustainable supply chains: Making value the priority, P6
  120. QRUNFLEH, S. and TARAFDAR, M. (2013). Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: The role of strategic supplier partnership and postponement. Supply chain management: An international journal, 18 (6), 571-582.
  121. QRUNFLEH, Sufian and TARAFDAR, Monideepa (2013). Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: the role of strategic supplier partnership and postponement. Supply chain management, 18 (6), 571-582.
  122. RANDALL, Taylor R., MORGAN, Ruskin M. and MORTON, Alysse R. (2003). Efficient versus responsive supply chain choice: an empirical examination of influential factors. Journal of product innovation management, 20 (6), 430- 443.
  123. RAO, P. H. (2014). Measuring Environmental Performance across a Green Supply Chain: A Managerial Overview of Environmental Indicators. Vikalpa, 39 (1), 57-74.
  124. RASHID, Shahid and WESTON, Richard (2012). Design of an integrated methodology for analytical design of complex supply chains. Advances in decision sciences, 2012 .
  125. REDDI, Krishna R. and MOON, Young B. (2013). Modelling engineering change management in a new product development supply chain. International journal of production research, 51 (17), 5271-5291.
  126. REZAPOUR, Shabnam, et al. (2014). Designing a new supply chain for competition against an existing supply chain. Transportation research part E: Logistics and transportation review, 67 , 124-140.
  127. REZAPOUR, Shabnam, et al. (2015). Competitive closed-loop supply chain network design with price-dependent demands. Journal of cleaner production, 93 , 251-272.
  128. Roland Berger Strategy Consultants, (2009). Global SCM excellence study, p.5. ROH, James, HONG, Paul and MIN, Hokey (2014). Implementation of a responsive supply chain strategy in global complexity: The case of manufacturing firms. International journal of production economics, 147 , 198-210.
  129. ROMERO, Juan Camilo, et al. (2012). Collaborative Methodology for Supply Chain Quality Management: Framework and Integration With Strategic Decision Processes in Product Development. Proceedings of the european conference on information management & evaluation, , 418-427.
  130. ROMSDAL, Anita, STRANDHAGEN, Jan Ola and DREYER, Heidi Carin (2014). Can differentiated production planning and control enable both responsiveness and efficiency in food production? Proceedings in food system dynamics, , 324-333.
  131. RONI, Md S., et al. (2014). A supply chain network design model for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants. Transportation research: Part E, 61 , 115- 134.
  132. SABET, Ehsan, et al. (2017). Supply chain integration strategies in fast evolving industries. The international journal of logistics management, 28 (1), 29-46.
  133. SABRI, Ehap H. and BEAMON, Benita M. (2000). A multi-objective approach to simultaneous strategic and operational planning in supply chain design. Omega, 28 (5), 581-598.
  134. SANDERS, Nada R. (2011). Supply chain management: A global perspective. Wiley Global Education.
  135. SANTA-EULALIA, Luis-Antonio, et al. (2011). Agent-based experimental investigations of the robustness of tactical planning and control policies in a softwood lumber supply chain. Production planning & control, 22 (8), 782- 799. SATYA, Parkash Kaushik and VEERENDER, Kumar Kaushik (2014). A
  136. Simplified, Result Oriented Supplier Performance Management System Testing Framework for Sme. Logforum, 10 (2), 191-203.
  137. SCHALTEGGER, Stefan and BURRITT, Roger (2014). Measuring and managing sustainability performance of supply chainsReview and sustainability supply chain management framework. Supply chain management, 19 (3), 232-241.
  138. SEURING, Stefan, et al. (2008). Sustainability and supply chain management-an introduction to the special issue, .
  139. SHAHI, Shashi and PULKKI, Reino (2013). Supply Chain Network Optimization of the Canadian Forest Products Industry: A Critical Review. American journal of industrial and business management, 3 (07), 631.
  140. SHAHZAD, Kashif M. and HADJ-HAMOU, Khaled (2013). Integrated supply chain and product family architecture under highly customized demand. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 24 (5), 1005-1018.
  141. SHAO, Junyang, MOSER, Roger and HENKE, Michael (2012). Multidimensional supply performance framework: A conceptual development and empirical analysis. International journal of production economics, 138 (1), 26-34.
  142. SHAO, Junyang, MOSER, Roger and HENKE, Michael (2012). Multidimensional supply performance framework: A conceptual development and empirical analysis. International journal of production economics, 138 (1), 26-34.
  143. SHEN, Z. (2007). Integrated supply chain design models: a survey and future research directions. Journal of industrial and management optimization, 3 (1),
  144. SHUKLA, Aviral, LALIT, Vishal Agarwal and VENKATASUBRAMANIAN, Venkat (2011). Optimizing efficiency-robustness trade-offs in supply chain design under uncertainty due to disruptions. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 41 (6), 623-647.
  145. SINGH, Rajesh Kumar and SHARMA, Milind Kumar (2014). Prioritising the alternatives for flexibility in supply chains. Production planning & control, 25 (2), 176-192.
  146. SOMUYIWA, Adebambo and ADEBAYO, Toyin (2013). Firm's competitiveness through supply chain responsiveness and supply chain management practices in Nigeria. Journal of poverty, investment and development, 1 , 142-147.
  147. SONI, Gunjan and KODALI, Rambabu (2013). A critical review of supply chain management frameworks: proposed framework. Benchmarking: An international journal, 20 (2), 263-298.
  148. VERDOUW, C. N., et al. (2011). A framework for modelling business processes in demand-driven supply chains. Production planning & control, 22 (4), 365-388.
  149. VIDALAKIS, Christos, TOOKEY, John E. and SOMMERVILLE, James (2011). The logistics of construction supply chains: the builders' merchant perspective. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 18 (1), 66-81.
  150. VLAJIC, Jelena V., VAN, der Vorst and HAIJEMA, René (2012). A framework for designing robust food supply chains. International journal of production economics, 137 (1), 176-189.
  151. WAGNER, Stephan M., GROSSE-RUYKEN, Pan Theo and ERHUN, Feryal (2012). The link between supply chain fit and financial performance of the firm. Journal of operations management, 30 (4), 340-353.
  152. WANG, HS (2009). A two-phase ant colony algorithm for multi-echelon defective supply chain network design. European journal of operational research, 192 (1), 243-252.
  153. WANG, Jun (2005). A review of operations research applications in workforce planning and potential modeling of military training, .
  154. WANG, Sufang, FANG, Feihu and CHENG, Nuo (2011). Research on the framework of supply chain network design. In: Artificial intelligence, management science and electronic commerce (AIMSEC), 2011 2nd international conference on, IEEE, 1451-1454.
  155. WANG, Fan, LAI, Xiaofan and SHI, Ning (2011). A multi-objective optimization for green supply chain network design. Decision support systems, 51 (2), 262-269.
  156. WIELAND, Andreas (2013). Selecting the right supply chain based on risks. Journal of manufacturing technology management, 24 (5), 652-668.
  157. WILMSMEIER, Gordon, et al. (2014). Efficiency: a key ingredient towards sustainable supply chains.
  158. WILSON, Martha C. (2007). The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transportation research part E: Logistics and transportation review, 43 (4), 295-320.
  159. XU, Jiuping, LIU, Qiang and WANG, Rui (2008). A class of multi-objective supply chain networks optimal model under random fuzzy environment and its application to the industry of Chinese liquor. Information sciences, 178 (8), 2022-2043.
  160. XU, He, LIU, Zhen Zhen and ZHANG, Sheng Hao (2012). A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply chain design with price and delivery lead time considerations. International journal of production economics, 139 (2), 654-663.
  161. YOUN, S., YANG, M. G. and ROH, J. J. (2012). Extending the efficient and responsive supply chains framework to the green context. Benchmarking, 19 (4), 463-480.
  162. YU, Wantao, et al. (2014). Integrated green supply chain management and operational performance. Supply chain management: An international journal, 19 (5/6), 683-696.
  163. ZAILANI, Suhaiza, et al. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey. International journal of production economics, 140 (1), 330-340.
  164. ZANJANI, Masoumeh Kazemi, AIT-KADI, Daoud and NOURELFATH, Mustapha (2010). Robust production planning in a manufacturing environment with random yield: A case in sawmill production planning. European journal of operational research, 201 (3), 882-891.

Related papers

The Best of Supply Chain Management Review 7 Principles of Supply Chain Management The VISION EXECUTION PROGRESS FUNDAMENTALS TECHNOLOGY
Kaveen Anushka

of Supply Chain Management, " layed out a clear and compelling case for excellence in supply chain management. The insights provided here remain remarkably fresh ten years later. M anagers increasingly fi nd themselves assigned the role of the rope in a very real tug of war—pulled one way by customers' mounting demands and the opposite way by the company's need for growth and profi tability. Many have discovered that they can keep the rope from snapping and, in fact, achieve profi table growth by treating supply chain management as a strategic variable. These savvy managers recognize two important things. First, they think about the supply chain as a whole—all the links involved in managing the fl ow of products, services, and information from their suppliers' suppliers to their customers' customers (that is, channel customers, such as distributors and retailers). Second, they pursue tangible outcomes—focused on revenue growth, asset utilization, and cost. Rejecting the traditional view of a company and its component parts as distinct functional entities, these managers realize that the real measure of success is how well activities coordinate across the supply chain to create value for customers, while increasing the profi tability of every link in the chain. Our analysis of initiatives to improve supply chain management by more than 100 manufacturers, distributors, and retailers shows many making great progress, while others fail dismally. The successful initiatives that have contributed to profi table growth share several themes. They are typically broad efforts, combining both strategic and tactical change. They also refl ect a holistic approach, viewing the supply chain from end to end and orchestrating efforts so that the whole improvement achieved—in revenue, costs, and asset utilization—is greater than the sum of its parts. 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

View PDFchevron_right
Fawcett, S.E., Magnan, G.M., & McCarter, M.W. (2008). The bridges, barriers, and benefits to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13(1) 35–48.
Matthew W McCarter

Purpose – The purpose of this article is to provide academics and practitioners a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the benefits, barriers, and bridges to successful collaboration in strategic supply chains. Design/methodology/approach – A triangulation method consisting of a literature review, a cross‐functional mail survey, and 51 in‐depth case analyses was implemented. Senior managers from purchasing, manufacturing, and logistics were targeted in the mail survey. The break down by channel category interviews is as follows: 14 retailers, 13 finished goods assemblers, 12 first‐tier suppliers, three lower‐tier suppliers, and nine service providers. Findings – Customer satisfaction and service is perceived as more enduring than cost savings. All managers recognize technology, information, and measurement systems as major barriers to successful supply chain collaboration. However, the people issues – such as culture, trust, aversion to change, and willingness to collaborate – are more intractable. People are the key bridge to successful collaborative innovation and should therefore not be overlooked as companies invest in supply chain enablers such as technology, information, and measurement systems. Research limitations/implications – The average mail‐survey response rate was relatively low: 23.5 percent. The case study analyses were not consistent in frequency across channel functions. Although the majority of companies interviewed and surveyed were international, all surveys and interviews were managers based in the US. Practical implications – This study provides new insight into understanding the success and hindering factors of supply chain management. The extensive literature review, the cross‐channel analysis, and case studies provide academics and managers a macro picture of the goals, challenges, and strategies for implementing supply chain management. Originality/value – This paper uses triangulation methodology for examining key issues of supply chain management at multiple levels within the supply chain.

View PDFchevron_right
A study of factors affecting supply chain performance
Madhusudanan Pillai V

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

In the present global market, the competition is not between the companies but between the supply chains. The comparison of performance measures of supply chains helps to identify a good supply chain. The best performing supply chains may survive over a long period. The performance of a supply chain is affected by various internal and external factors. The objective of this paper is to identify and conduct a detailed study of the major factors affecting the supply chain performance. The factors are identified by reviewing various literature in the supply chain field. In this respect, a total of 54 literature are reviewed. The major factors identified as supply chain structure, inventory control policy, information sharing, customer demand, forecasting method, lead time and review period length. The optimum selection of parameters of these factors improves the supply chain performance.

View PDFchevron_right
Principles of Supply Chain Management
Faustino Taderera

2010

Professor Faustino Taderera, the celebrity and towering figure, is the most published and finest Supply Chain Management and International Business brains ever produced by Zimbabwe and the African continent, an academic icon and guru nicknamed, "The Tom Peters of Zimbabwe, Africa and the Middle East." His students call him, "The Rumbler, The Caterpillar, The Rollercoaster and King Solomon," mainly for his passion, depth and incisive research in these areas. This book, Principles of Supply Chain Management, his 58th book, is a unique set book for undergraduate and postgraduate courses in Logistics & Supply Chain Management and covers topics like:- supply chain; international transport documentation and their legal aspects, inventory; logistics; bonded warehouses; shipping documentation and customs procedures; exchange control regulations; insurance; L/Cs; hedging; incoterms and contracts. Professor Faustino always says, "Golden fish have no hiding place. I am...

View PDFchevron_right
Book Review: Exploring the Supply Chain: Theory and Practice
Hafsa Maryam

International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2013

This book looks at the basic concepts of Supply Chain Management and provides a comprehensive coverage of the methodology and key strategies drivers in the different processes involved in operating and designing a Supply Chain. It describes the behavioral differences and explains the different tools that have been designed for effective supply chain management. This book is not an academic treatise, though it provides the most comprehensive coverage of the different facets of supply chain management. The authors have made sure that all chapters begin with a small case study that illustrates the specific concepts that are illustrated within the chapter. The book explains the evolution of Supply Chain Management, its concept and philosophy. It also looks at the different elements that go into the design of the Supply Chain and the purchasing functions from the supply chain perspective. The book not only deals with the planning function of SCM, it also covers the fundamentals concepts of forecasting and demand management, planning and control, including the aggregate plan, the different types of inventory models and their classification, work-in-progress and finished goods inventory and quality as a new and major component of Supply Chain Management.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Business
  • Operational excellence
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved