Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

On the values and attitudes of economics students in Portugal

2022, Revista de Sociologia e Política

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-98732230E021

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies regarding the values and attitudes of Economics students have noticed a greater leaning towards the free riding phenomena and the market economy. Are these traits always valid? Do they coexist with other sociological relevant aspects? Materials and Methods: A survey was conducted in Lisbon (Portugal) in 2016 with Economics students. In addition to the economic view, it was studied their self-perception at the left-right spectrum and their interest in politics. The results of this survey were compared with previous research on three social groups (young citizens, elder citizens, and other students). The data were statistically analyzed through correlation and factorial analysis tests. Results: The research revealed a tendency towards a right-wing self-perception and an increased concern about politics by these Portuguese students. However, these traits were attenuated, because those Economics students converge with other group's values, specially the "young citizens" and the "old citizens". Generally, groups with greater leaning towards free riding are also more inclined to pro-market ideas, right-wing, and interested in politics. Results indicate the existence of other substantially different behavioral components, being one of them correspondent to the variables used to measure "free riding" and an opposite component which we can label "open-mindedness". Discussion: As a whole, the results suggest a considerable influence of Economics in the mental framework of these students. Evidence seems to signal a diffuse cultural influence, corresponding to a simplified and impoverished version of the academic field.

References (46)

  1. Banerjee, M., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. & Roeper, J. (2020) Narratives and their impact on students' information seeking and critical online reasoning in higher education economics and medicine. Frontiers in Education, 5(570625), pp. 1-17. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2020.570625
  2. Carter, J.R. & Irons, M.D. (1991) Are economists different, and if so, why? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, pp. 171-177. DOI: 10.1257/jep.5.2.171
  3. Cipriani, G.P., Lubian, D. & Zago, A. (2009) Natural born economists? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), pp. 455-468. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2008.10.001
  4. Cioni, M. & Rossi, M.A. (2020) Whither pluralism in economics education? New empirical evidence. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Statistica, 844, p. 1-19.
  5. Delgado-Betancourth, S.X. (2014) Rethinking economics education: challenges and opportunities. Workplace, 23, pp. 48-56.
  6. Dzionek-Kozlowska, J. & Rehman, S.N. (2017a) Attitudes of economics and sociology students towards cooperation. A cross-cultural study. Economics and Sociology, 10(4), pp. 124-136. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/10
  7. Dzionek-Kozlowska, J. & Rehman, S.N. (2017b) Indoctrination, preselection or culture? Economic education and attitudes to- wards cooperation. Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, 292(6), pp. 57-77. DOI: 10.33119/GN/100739
  8. Elegido, J. (2009) Business education and erosion of character. African Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), pp. 16-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15249/4-1-57
  9. Espín, A.M., Correa, M. & Ruiz-Villaverde, A. (2022) Economics students: self-selected in preferences and indoctrinated in beliefs. International Review of Economics Education, 39, pp. 1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2021.100231
  10. Etzioni, A. (2015) The moral effects of economic teaching. Sociological Forum, 30(1), pp. 228-233. DOI: 10.1111/socf.12153
  11. Everitt, B. & Dunn, G. (2001) Applied multivariate data analysis, 2th edition. London: Hodder Arnold.
  12. Faravelli, M. (2007) How context matters: a survey-based experiment on distributive justice. Journal of Public Economics, 91(7-8), pp. 1399-1422. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.01.004
  13. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. & Sutton, R.I. (2005) Economics language and assumptions: how theories can become self-fulfilling. The Academy of Management Review, 30(1), pp. 8-24. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.521883
  14. Fischer, M., Kauder, B., Potrafke, N. & Ursprung, H.W. (2017) Support for free-market policies and reforms: does the field of study influence students' political attitudes? European Journal of Political Economy, 48, pp. 180-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.07.002
  15. Frank, B. & Schulze, G.G. (1998) How tempting is corruption? More bad news about economists. Diskussionsbeiträge aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, 520(164), pp. 1-13.
  16. Frank, B. & Schulze, G.G. (2000) Does economics make citizens corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43(1), pp. 101-113. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00111-6
  17. Frey, B.S. (1986) Economists favour the price system -who else does? Kyklos, 39, pp. 537-563. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1986.tb00677.x
  18. Gandal, N. & Roccas, S. (2002) Good neighbours / bad citizens: personal value priorities of economists. Discussion Paper No. 3660. CEPR Press, pp. 1-13. Available in: https://cepr.org/publications/dp3660
  19. Gandal, N., Roccas, S., Sagiv, L. & Wrzesniewski, A. (2004) Personal value priorities of economists. Human Relations, 58(10), pp. 1227-1252. DOI: 10.1177/0018726705058911
  20. Goossens, A. & Méon, P.-G. (2010) The impact of studying economics, and other disciplines, on the belief that voluntary ex- change makes everyone better off. CEB. Working Paper n. 12. [online] Brussels: Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management. Available in: <https://ideas.repec.org/p/sol/wpaper/10-012.html>. Acesso em: 24 de julho. 2022.
  21. Graça, J.C., Lopes, J.C. & Correia, R.G. (2016) Economics education: literacy or mind framing? Evidence from a survey on the social building of trust in Portugal. Análise Social, 51(220), pp. 516-542.
  22. Graça, J.C., Caiado, J. & Correia, R.G. (2020) Sociopolitical values, attitudes and behaviors of Portuguese economics students. Sociologia: Problemas e Práticas, 92, pp. 111-132. DOI: 10.7458/SPP20209213699
  23. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2010) Multivariate data analysis. 7th edition. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  24. Hamilton, L. (2013) Statistic with Stata: Version 12. 8th edition. Boston: Brooks/Cole.
  25. Haucap, J. & Just, T. (2004) Not guilty? Another look at the nature and nurture of economics students. European Journal of Law and Economics, 29, pp. 239-254. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-009-9119-5
  26. Hellmich, S.N. (2020) Social psychological aspects of "making" economists: a review of the nature versus nurture debate. Citi- zenship, Social and Economics Education, 19(1), pp. 23-50. DOI: 10.1177/2047173420908068
  27. Hertel, G., Aarts. H. & Zeelenberg, M. (2002) What do you think is 'fair'? Effects of ingroup norms and outcome control on fairness judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(3), pp. 327-341. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.92
  28. Hodgson, G.M. (2004) Opportunism is not the only reason why firms exist: why an explanatory emphasis on opportunism may mislead management strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(2), pp. 401-418. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dth016
  29. Hole, A.D. (2013) How do economists differ from others in distributive situations? Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 38(4), pp. 1-30.
  30. Hummel, K., Pfaff, D. & Rost, K. (2016) Does economics and business education wash away moral judgment competence? Journal of Business Ethics. 150, pp. 559-577. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3142-6
  31. Johnson, R. & Wichern, D. (2007) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. 6th edition. Hoboken: Prentice-Hall.
  32. Lanteri, A. (2008) (Why) Do selfish people self-select in economics? Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 1(1), pp. 1-23. DOI:10.23941/ejpe.v1i1.1
  33. Lebaron, F. (2012) A formação dos economistas e a ordem simbólica mercantil. Revista Espaço de Diálogo e Desconexão, 4(2), pp.1-35. DOI: 10.32760/1984-1736/REDD/2012.v4i2.5176
  34. Lenger, A. (2018) Socialization in the academic and professional field: revealing the Homo Oeconomicus Academicus. Histor- ical Social Research, 43 (3), pp. 39-62. DOI: 10.12759/hsr.43.2018.3.39-62
  35. López-Pérez, R. & Spiegelman, E. (2012) Do economists lie more? Economic analysis -working paper series. Working Paper n. 4 [online]. Madrid: Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. Available in: <https://repositorio.uam.es/bitstream/han- dle/10486/662716/Economcis%20Lie_L%C3%B3pez_EAWPS_2012.pdf?sequence=1>. Acessed in: Jul. 24, 2022.
  36. Marwell, G. & Ames, R.E. (1981) Economists free ride, does anyone else?: experiments on the provision of public goods. Jour- nal of Public Economics, 15(3), pp. 295-310. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(81)90013-X
  37. Mautz, F.C. (2014) El pensamiento de los estudiantes de economía en Chile. Thesis to qualify for the Master in Economic Anal- ysis. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
  38. Racko, G. (2019) The values of economics. Journal of Business Ethics, 154, pp. 35-48. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3442-5
  39. Scott, J.H. & Rothman, M.P. (1975) The effect of an introductory economics course on student political attitudes. Journal of Economic Education, 6(2), pp. 107-112. DOI: 10.2307/1182461
  40. Shabab, C.R. (2020) A PRiME perspective on economics curriculum design. Emerald Open Research, 2(38), pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.35241/emeraldopenres.13779.1
  41. Sjöberg, L. & Engelberg, E. (2006) Attitudes to economic risk-taking, sensation seeking and values of business students spe- cializing in finance. Business administration. Working Paper, n. 3. [online] Stockholm: Center for Risk Research. Avail- able in: <https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.658.1789&rep=rep1&type=pdf>. Acessed in: Jul. 24, 2022.
  42. Su, H.-C. & Colander, D. (2021) The economist as scientist, engineer or plumber? Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 43(2), pp. 297-312. DOI: 10.1017/S1053837220000231
  43. Varoufakis, Y. (2002) Foundations of economics: a beginner's companion. 2th edition. London and New York: Taylor & Fran- cis e-Library.
  44. Wang, L. & Murnighan, J.K. (2009) Economics and greed. In 22nd Annual International Association of Conflict Management Conference. Kyoto, Japan.
  45. Williamson, O.E. (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and anti-trust implications. A study in the economics of internal or- ganization. New York: Free Press.
  46. Palavras-chave: estudantes; ideologia esquerda e direita; interesse pela política; regulação do mercado; survey RESUMO Introdução: Vários estudos sobre os valores e atitudes dos estudantes de Economia têm notado sua maior inclinação para o parasitismo (free riding) e para a regulação pelo mercado. Estes traços são sempre válidos? Eles coexistem com outros aspectos socio- logicamente relevantes? Materiais e Métodos: Foi realizado um survey em Lisboa (Portugal) em 2016 com estudantes de Economia. Foram pesquisadas, além da visão econômica, a autopercepção desses indivíduos no espectro esquerda-direita e o interesse pela política. Os resultados desse inquérito foram comparados com pesquisas anteriores sobre outros três grupos sociais (cidadãos jovens, cidadãos idosos e outros estudantes). Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente por testes de correlação e análise fatorial. Resultados: A pesquisa revelou uma tendência para uma autopercepção de direita e um interesse acrescido pela política por parte desses estudantes portugueses. Entretanto, essas características foram atenuadas, pois os estudantes de economia convergem com os valores dos outros grupos, em especial os "jovens adultos" e os "adultos idosos". Genericamente, grupos mais inclinados ao parasitismo são também mais pró-mercado e de direita e mais interessados na política. Os resultados indicam a existência de outros componentes atitudinais consideravelmente diferentes, um deles correspondendo às variáveis utilizadas com o propósito de mensurar o "free riding" e um componente oposto que podemos chamar genericamente de "open-mindedness". Discussão: No conjunto, os resultados sugerem uma influência considerável da Economia no enquadramento mental desses estudantes. As evidências parecem sinalizar uma influência cultural difusa, correspondente a uma versão simplificada e conceitualmente empo- brecida da disciplina.