Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Segregated interactions in urban and online space

2020, EPJ Data Science

https://doi.org/10.1140/EPJDS/S13688-020-00238-7

Abstract

Urban income segregation is a widespread phenomenon that challenges societies across the globe. Classical studies on segregation have largely focused on the geographic distribution of residential neighborhoods rather than on patterns of social behaviors and interactions. In this study, we analyze segregation in economic and social interactions by observing credit card transactions and Twitter mentions among thousands of individuals in three culturally different metropolitan areas. We show that segregated interaction is amplified relative to the expected effects of geographic segregation in terms of both purchase activity and online communication. Furthermore, we find that segregation increases with difference in socio-economic status but is asymmetric for purchase activity, i.e., the amount of interaction from poorer to wealthier neighborhoods is larger than vice versa. Our results provide novel insights into the understanding of behavioral segregation in human interactions with sig...

References (44)

  1. Sampson RJ (2012) Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  2. Burgess EW (1928) Residential segregation in American cities. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 140:105-115
  3. Duncan OD, Duncan B (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. Am Sociol Rev 20(2):210-217
  4. Schelling TC (1971) Dynamic models of segregation. J Math Sociol 1(2):143-186
  5. Glaeser E, Vigdor J (2012) The end of the segregated century: racial separation in America's neighborhoods, 1890-2010. Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
  6. Firebaugh G, Farrell CR (2016) Still large, but narrowing: the sizable decline in racial neighborhood inequality in metropolitan America, 1980-2010. Demography 53(1):139-164
  7. Reardon SF, Bischoff K (2011) Income inequality and income segregation. Am J Sociol 116(4):1092-1153
  8. Florida R, Mellander C (2016) The geography of inequality: difference and determinants of wage and income inequality across US metros. Reg Stud 50(1):79-92
  9. Fry R, Taylor P (2012) The rise of residential segregation by income. Pew Research Center 11. http://inequality.stanford.edu/income-segregation-maps. Accessed: 2019-03-17 (2018)
  10. Iceland J, Weinberg DH, Steinmetz E (2002) Racial and ethnic residential segregation in the United States: 1980-2000. U.S. Census Bureau, Series CENSR-3
  11. Massey DS, Denton NA (1998) The dimensions of residential segregation. Soc Forces 67(2):281-315
  12. Freeman L (1978) Segregation in social networks. Sociol Methods Res 6(4):411-429
  13. Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabási A-L, Brewer D, Christakis N, Contractor N, Fowler J, Gutmann M, Jebara T, King G, Macy M, Roy D, Alstyne MV (2009) Computational social science. Science 323(5915):721-723
  14. Pentland A (2014) Social physics: how good ideas spread. Penguin, Baltimore
  15. Wong DWS, Shaw S-L (2011) Measuring segregation: an activity space approach. J Geogr Syst 13(2):127-145
  16. Bora N, Chang Y-H, Maheswaran R (2014) Mobility patterns and user dynamics in racially segregated geographies of US cities. In: Proceedings of the international conference on social computing, behavioral-cultural modeling, and prediction, pp 11-18
  17. Boterman WR, Musterd S (2016) Cocooning urban life: exposure to diversity in neighbourhoods, workplaces and transport. Cities 59:139-147
  18. Wang D, Li F (2016) Daily activity space and exposure: a comparative study of Hong Kong's public and private housing residents' segregation in daily life. Cities 59:148-155
  19. Yip NM, Forrest R, Xian S (2016) Exploring segregation and mobilities: application of an activity tracking app on mobile phone. Cities 59:156-163
  20. Wang Q, Phillips NE, Small ML, Sampson RJ (2018) Urban mobility and neighborhood isolation in America's 50 largest cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802537115
  21. Morales AJ, Dong X, Bar-Yam Y, Pentland A (2019) Segregation and polarization in urban areas. R Soc Open Sci 6(10):190573
  22. Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2011) Ideological segregation online and offline. Q J Econ 126(4):1799-1839
  23. Morales AJ, Borondo J, Losada JC, Benito RM (2015) Measuring political polarization: Twitter shows the two sides of Venezuela. Chaos 25(3):033114
  24. Bakshy E, Messing S, Adamic L (2015) Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348(6239):1130-1132
  25. Quattrociocchi W, Scala A, Sunstein CR (2016) Echo chambers on Facebook. Available at SSRN. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2795110
  26. Bastos MT, Mercea D, Baronchelli A (2018) The geographic embedding of online echo chambers: Evidence from the Brexit campaign. PLoS ONE 13(11):e0206841
  27. Bail CA, Argyle LP, Brown TW, Bumpus JP, Chen H, Hunzaker MBF, Lee J, Mann M, Merhout F, Volfovsky A (2018) Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115
  28. Levy G, Razin R (2019) Echo chambers and their effects on economic and political outcomes. Annu Rev Econ 11:303-328
  29. Blumenstock J, Fratamico L (2013) Social and spatial ethnic segregation: a framework for analyzing segregation with large-scale spatial network data. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual symposium on computing for development
  30. Leo Y, Karsai M, Sarraute C, Fleury E (2016) Correlations of consumption patterns in social-economic networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining
  31. Clemente RD, Luengo-Oroz M, Travizano M, Xu S, Vaitla B, González MC (2018) Sequences of purchases in credit card data reveal lifestyles in urban populations. Nat Commun 9:3330
  32. Dong X, Suhara Y, Bozkaya B, Singh VK, Lepri B, Pentland A (2018) Social bridges in urban purchase behavior. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol, Spec Issue Urban Intell 9(3):33-13329
  33. Luo F, Cao G, Mulligan K, Li X (2016) Explore spatiotemporal and demographic characteristics of human mobility via Twitter: a case study of Chicago. Appl Geogr 70:11-25
  34. Singh VK, Bozkaya B, Pentland A (2015) Money walks: implicit mobility behavior and financial wellbeing. PLoS ONE 10(8):0136628
  35. Eagle N, Macy M, Claxton R (2010) Network diversity and economic development. Science 328(5981):1029-1031
  36. Dong X, Jahani E, Morales AJ, Bozkaya B, Lepri B, Pentland A (2020) Purchase patterns, socioeconomic status, and political inclination. World Bank Econ Rev 34:S9-S13
  37. Newman MEJ (2003) Mixing patterns in networks. Phys Rev E 67(2):026126
  38. Krings G, Calabrese F, Ratti C, Blondel VD (2009) Urban gravity: a model for inter-city telecommunication flows. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2009:07003
  39. Tóth G, Wachs J, Clemente RD, Jakobi A, Ságvári B, Kertész J, Lengyel B (2019) Inequality is rising where social network segregation interacts with urban topology. arXiv:1909.11414
  40. Rodriguez-Moral A, Vorsatz M (2016) An overview of the measurement of segregation: classical approaches and social network analysis. In: Commendatore P, Matilla-García M, Varela LM, Cánovas JS (eds) Complex networks and dynamics. Springer, Cham, pp 93-119
  41. Bojanowskia M, Corten R (2014) Measuring segregation in social networks. Soc Netw 39(2):14-32
  42. Efron B (1979) Computers and the theory of statistics: thinking the unthinkable. SIAM Rev 21(4):460-480
  43. Greenwood J, Guner N, Kocharkov G, Santos C (2014) Marry your like: assortative mating and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 104(5):348-353
  44. Louail T, Lenormand M, Arias JM, Ramasco JJ (2017) Crowdsourcing the Robin Hood effect in cities. Appl Netw Sci 2:11